On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, L A Walsh wrote:
Alan Hodgson wrote:
Rejecting the message during receipt causes the sending server to generate
a bounce. If it's at all functional.
That used to happen on poorly implemented mailing lists -- a
delivery error would be bounced back to the email list as a
Alan Hodgson wrote:
Rejecting the message during receipt causes the sending server to
generate a bounce. If it's at all functional.
On 27.04.18 09:32, L A Walsh wrote:
If a given user wants emails to be dropped at the
border -- that would be fine. *I* would not mind configuring
a filt
Alan Hodgson wrote:
Rejecting the message during receipt causes the sending server to
generate a bounce. If it's at all functional.
That used to happen on poorly implemented mailing
lists -- a delivery error would be bounced back to the
email list as a reply that would get se
On Fri, 27 Apr 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 26.04.18 13:41, L A Walsh wrote:
To my way of thinking, dropping someone else's email,
telling the sender the email is being rejected for having
spam-like characteristics and telling the recipient nothing
seems like it might have legal liabi
On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:41:05 -0700
L A Walsh wrote:
> To my way of thinking, dropping someone else's email,
> telling the sender the email is being rejected for having
> spam-like characteristics and telling the recipient nothing
> seems like it might have legal liability for the for the
> user p
On 2018-04-26 (14:41 MDT), L A Walsh wrote:
>
> To my way of thinking, dropping someone else's email, telling the sender the
> email is being rejected for having spam-like characteristics and telling the
> recipient nothing seems like it might have legal liability for the for the
> user potent
On 26.04.18 13:41, L A Walsh wrote:
To my way of thinking, dropping someone else's email,
telling the sender the email is being rejected for having
spam-like characteristics and telling the recipient nothing
seems like it might have legal liability for the for the
user potentially missing vital e
On 26 Apr 2018, at 16:41 (-0400), L A Walsh wrote:
To my way of thinking, dropping someone else's email,
telling the sender the email is being rejected for having
spam-like characteristics and telling the recipient nothing
seems like it might have legal liability for the for the
user potentially
On Thu, 2018-04-26 at 13:41 -0700, L A Walsh wrote:
> To my way of thinking, dropping someone else's email,
> telling the sender the email is being rejected for having
> spam-like characteristics and telling the recipient nothing
> seems like it might have legal liability for the for the
> user pot
To my way of thinking, dropping someone else's email,
telling the sender the email is being rejected for having
spam-like characteristics and telling the recipient nothing
seems like it might have legal liability for the for the
user potentially missing vital email.
It also would seem to violate
10 matches
Mail list logo
