On 3/25/10 5:30 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
On 25/03/2010 2:26 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
score KHOP_SC_TOP2003.999 2.65 3.999 2.65
I can't think of a way for the GA to know that the rule contains the
same info as a DNSBL test. There are rule overlap
On 3/26/10 7:39 AM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
OnI can't think of a way for the GA to know that the rule contains the
same info as a DNSBL test. There are rule overlap stats, but I don't
think that would be enough with only a small number of ham occurrences.
yes, somehow the sender was in spamcop rbl, and the nightly sa-update
keeps up to date with 72_active.cf rule..
but, maybe a score of 5.3 is pretty high for ONE rule?
(
KHOP_SC_TOP200 is 3.9. but since its in the spamcop database, you add 1.34.
total of 5.3. )
score KHOP_SC_TOP200
On 25/03/2010 2:26 PM, Michael Scheidell wrote:
yes, somehow the sender was in spamcop rbl, and the nightly sa-update
keeps up to date with 72_active.cf rule..
but, maybe a score of 5.3 is pretty high for ONE rule?
(
KHOP_SC_TOP200 is 3.9. but since its in the spamcop database, you add
