Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On fre 27 nov 2009 18:08:23 CET, Allen Chen wrote DNSBLs. We are non-profit organization and don't have too much email traffic. On 27.11.09 18:22, Benny Pedersen wrote: install bind, check spamhaus dnsbl in sendmail, add more internal spam tests in sendmail, dont add to much dnsbl in

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-30 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies? Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*. On 27.11.09 17:17, Benny Pedersen wrote: priceless reply-to Priceless? Bullshit. Useless and annoying. Breaks (or at

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-30 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 10:56 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies? Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*. The obvious is to simply ignore such private mails

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-30 Thread rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
Matus forgot to include this one he sent to me personally: On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:03 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Why do you tell me? Tell the OP, I just have used the same terminology. On 27.11.09 15:47, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: Matus, why are you once more sending me off

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-30 Thread Benny Pedersen
On man 30 nov 2009 10:56:47 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote Priceless? Bullshit. Useless and annoying. Breaks (or at least makes harder) possibility for private replies. i wont solve all worlds problems, but seem reply-to is missused allot out there I sometimes send private reply

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.11.09 17:12, Allen Chen wrote: I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am asking which free RBLs you guys are still using. first upgrade to 3.2.5.

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:27 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 26.11.09 17:12, Allen Chen wrote: I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 26.11.09 17:12, Allen Chen wrote: I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am asking which free RBLs you guys are still using. On Fri,

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:03 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Why do you tell me? Tell the OP, I just have used the same terminology. Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies? Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*. I pointed out that RBL is trademark just to

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread Robert Braver
On Thursday, November 26, 2009, 4:12:57 PM, Allen Chen wrote: AC I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's AC still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I AC think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am asking AC which free RBLs you guys are still

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread Benny Pedersen
On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies? Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*. priceless reply-to -- xpoint

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:17 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote: On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies? Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*. priceless reply-to Priceless indeed. Everybody else can

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread Allen Chen
Robert Braver wrote: On Thursday, November 26, 2009, 4:12:57 PM, Allen Chen wrote: AC I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's AC still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I AC think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am asking AC which free

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread Benny Pedersen
On fre 27 nov 2009 18:08:23 CET, Allen Chen wrote DNSBLs. We are non-profit organization and don't have too much email traffic. install bind, check spamhaus dnsbl in sendmail, add more internal spam tests in sendmail, dont add to much dnsbl in sendmail, and i have found spamcop is more for

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-27 Thread Robert Braver
On Friday, November 27, 2009, 11:08:23 AM, Allen Chen wrote: AC Thanks for all the replies. yes, RBL, I mean DNSBL. Also I heard AC that configuring DNSBL in sendmail is better than in AC spammassassin. because this can release some loads on AC spamassassin. Am I right? For some DNSBLs, yes.

which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-26 Thread Allen Chen
Hi, all I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am asking which free RBLs you guys are still using. Thank you, Allen

Re: which free RBL do you use?

2009-11-26 Thread LuKreme
On Nov 26, 2009, at 15:12, Allen Chen ac...@harbourfrontcentre.com wrote: which free RBLs you guys are still using. Zen is the only one I use.