On fre 27 nov 2009 18:08:23 CET, Allen Chen wrote
DNSBLs. We are non-profit organization and don't have too much email traffic.
On 27.11.09 18:22, Benny Pedersen wrote:
install bind, check spamhaus dnsbl in sendmail, add more internal spam
tests in sendmail, dont add to much dnsbl in
On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*.
On 27.11.09 17:17, Benny Pedersen wrote:
priceless reply-to
Priceless? Bullshit. Useless and annoying. Breaks (or at
On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 10:56 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*.
The obvious is to simply ignore such private mails
Matus forgot to include this one he sent to me personally:
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:03 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Why do you tell me? Tell the OP, I just have used the same
terminology.
On 27.11.09 15:47, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
Matus, why are you once more sending me off
On man 30 nov 2009 10:56:47 CET, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote
Priceless? Bullshit. Useless and annoying. Breaks (or at least makes harder)
possibility for private replies.
i wont solve all worlds problems, but seem reply-to is missused allot
out there
I sometimes send private reply
On 26.11.09 17:12, Allen Chen wrote:
I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year.
It's still running and filtering spam without any problems.
But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4.
So I am asking which free RBLs you guys are still using.
first upgrade to 3.2.5.
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 12:27 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 26.11.09 17:12, Allen Chen wrote:
I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year.
It's still running and filtering spam without any problems.
But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4.
So I am
On 26.11.09 17:12, Allen Chen wrote:
I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year.
It's still running and filtering spam without any problems.
But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4.
So I am asking which free RBLs you guys are still using.
On Fri,
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 14:03 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
Why do you tell me? Tell the OP, I just have used the same
terminology.
Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*. I pointed out that
RBL is trademark just to
On Thursday, November 26, 2009, 4:12:57 PM, Allen Chen wrote:
AC I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's
AC still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I
AC think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am asking
AC which free RBLs you guys are still
On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*.
priceless reply-to
--
xpoint
On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 17:17 +0100, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On fre 27 nov 2009 16:47:54 CET, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote
Matus, why are you once more sending me off list replies?
Again, will you *please* keep your replies *ON LIST*.
priceless reply-to
Priceless indeed. Everybody else can
Robert Braver wrote:
On Thursday, November 26, 2009, 4:12:57 PM, Allen Chen wrote:
AC I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year. It's
AC still running and filtering spam without any problems. But I
AC think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4. So I am asking
AC which free
On fre 27 nov 2009 18:08:23 CET, Allen Chen wrote
DNSBLs. We are non-profit organization and don't have too much email traffic.
install bind, check spamhaus dnsbl in sendmail, add more internal spam
tests in sendmail, dont add to much dnsbl in sendmail, and i have
found spamcop is more for
On Friday, November 27, 2009, 11:08:23 AM, Allen Chen wrote:
AC Thanks for all the replies. yes, RBL, I mean DNSBL. Also I heard
AC that configuring DNSBL in sendmail is better than in
AC spammassassin. because this can release some loads on
AC spamassassin. Am I right?
For some DNSBLs, yes.
Hi, all
I didn't touch my spamassassin server for almost one year.
It's still running and filtering spam without any problems.
But I think things are changed a lot. I'm using 3.2.4.
So I am asking which free RBLs you guys are still using.
Thank you,
Allen
On Nov 26, 2009, at 15:12, Allen Chen ac...@harbourfrontcentre.com
wrote:
which free RBLs you guys are still using.
Zen is the only one I use.
17 matches
Mail list logo