Re: truMerge 1.1.0 released

2010-05-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:17:38AM +0200, Schellingerhout, Nico wrote: Dear Subversion users, I am happy to announce the release of truMerge 1.1.0. truMerge is a merge helper tool that combines true renamehttp://subversion.tigris.org/merge-tracking/requirements.html functionality with

apache2, subversion, active directory, LDAPs authentication failures

2010-05-26 Thread Scott Lundgren
I have encountered a problem for which I've been unable to find a solution. Using RHEL 5.4 my configuration (slightly obscured for security) below appears to be working in that requesting the defined location triggers an auth prompt. However when using a correct username password authentication

compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread Paul Ebermann
Hello, I have here a personal Subversion repository hosted on my university account (for easy access from everywhere via SSH). (Its format is a 1.5 FSFS, from the information in the meta-files.) I'm now to revision 2529, which means the whole repository has 5098 files (most of them in db/revs

RE: compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread Thomas Loy
I wish I had an answer for you. We have a similar situation. I manage a dozen production SVN Repos and some are getting quite large. One repo has over 35,000 revisions. Some of the original revisions from years ago I'd like to extract and archive and just maintain the archive with history

Re: compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Paul Ebermann paul-eberm...@gmx.de wrote: I have here a personal Subversion repository hosted on my university account (for easy access from everywhere via SSH). (Its format is a 1.5 FSFS, from the information in the meta-files.) I'm now to revision

Re: compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 05:53:17PM +0200, Paul Ebermann wrote: The problem now is that I have a quota limitation of 3 files here (additionally to a size limit), and my svn repository fills now about 1/6 of this, steadily growing, forcing me to delete other files ... Is there any way

Re: svn support for symbolic link?

2010-05-26 Thread David Weintraub
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:44 PM, Keith Moore keith.mo...@securency.com I tried this on Windows 7 Enterprise with TortoiseSVN 1.6.8, Subversion 1.6.11 and got the error message svn: Symbolic links are not supported on this platform.  Now, I know these error messages can be a bit cryptic so

Re: compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread Paul Ebermann
Mark Phippard wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Paul Ebermann paul-eberm...@gmx.de wrote: [...] Is there any way to reduce the file number of the repository without throwing away information? As in, throw the changes in revisions 0 ... 999 together in one file (and this way even

Re: compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread Hyrum K. Wright
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Paul Ebermann paul-eberm...@gmx.dewrote: ... I think packing the revprops would (from a space viewpoint) be even more useful than packing the revisions, since most of these are quite small (similar) text files. Statistics: only 91 of those have a size of

Re: compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread Andy Levy
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 13:07, Paul Ebermann paul-eberm...@gmx.de wrote: Mark Phippard wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Paul Ebermann paul-eberm...@gmx.de wrote: [...] Is there any way to reduce the file number of the repository without throwing away information? As in, throw the

Re: compact repository (many files)

2010-05-26 Thread B Smith-Mannschott
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 19:07, Paul Ebermann paul-eberm...@gmx.de wrote: Mark Phippard wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Paul Ebermann paul-eberm...@gmx.de wrote: [...] Is there any way to reduce the file number of the repository without throwing away information? As in, throw the

Re: Downgrade repository's version (1.4-1.3) without losing local modifications

2010-05-26 Thread Andy Levy
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 15:54, Sergei Dyshel qyron.priv...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I have a single checked out SVN repository, shared between 2 machines (lets call them A and B). Until now I was using it only on A which has SVN 1.3 installed. Today I updated it on B which has version 1.4

RE: Downgrade repository's version (1.4-1.3) without losing local modifications

2010-05-26 Thread Bob Archer
On May 26, 2010, at 14:54, Sergei Dyshel wrote: I have a single checked out SVN repository, shared between 2 machines (lets call them A and B). Until now I was using it only on A which has SVN 1.3 installed. Today I updated it on B which has version 1.4 installed. It turned out that

Re: SVN merge issue in Solaris

2010-05-26 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Liu, Xiaodu Louie xiaodulouie@westernasset.com wrote: We have the svn merge performance issue on Solaris.  For a given repo, if we do svn merge on windows box, it takes about 35 seconds, but same merge will take about 6 minutes. Both svn version 1.6.6 and

RE: SVN merge issue in Solaris

2010-05-26 Thread Kadam, Shailesh
Hi Johan, We are running on solaris zone and able to run truss on the process, we see majority of time svn spends is in reading the .svn/entries file again and again. Why is that. Thanks Sal getcwd(/opt/projects/common_services/rjm/autsys-workspace/workspace/merge_test/MERGE_TEST, 1024) = 0

Strange status if .svn folder removed

2010-05-26 Thread Steve Armstrong
Hello all, I'm seeing strange behaviour on a Win7_64 machine running the 1.6.9 command-line binaries. I have a working copy checked out (C:\wc). Inside it, there's an empty folder that's source-controlled (C:\wc\logs). If I delete the .svn folder from within logs, then doing an svn st in the

Re: Strange status if .svn folder removed

2010-05-26 Thread Steve Armstrong
Wow, that was a fast reply. Ok, I'll just work around it for now then. Thanks for getting back to me. On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Hyrum K. Wright hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Steve Armstrong steve.armstr...@gmail.com wrote: Hello all, I'm

Re: Strange status if .svn folder removed

2010-05-26 Thread Daniel Becroft
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Steve Armstrong steve.armstr...@gmail.comwrote: Hello all, I'm seeing strange behaviour on a Win7_64 machine running the 1.6.9 command-line binaries. I have a working copy checked out (C:\wc). Inside it, there's an empty folder that's source-controlled

Re: truMerge 1.1.0 released

2010-05-26 Thread BRM
Checked out the website, and there doesn't seem to be much up on truMerge; it took me a while to find out it needs the command-line 1.5 series client to function. More info on the website would be useful - especially requirements, supported platforms, a working Wiki, etc. (No, I didn't log into

Re: Downgrade repository's version (1.4-1.3) without losing local modifications

2010-05-26 Thread Sergei Dyshel
Thank you all for answers, of course I meant working copy and mistakenly used term repository. Erik, I thought about solution you proposed but how can I deal with added/deleted files? I have plenty of them... -- Regards, Sergei Dyshel On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 23:18, Erik Andersson