Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Philip Martin
Davor Josipovic writes: >> Are you running Linux or Windows? Is the disk local or networked? > > Server is Debian 9.3. Disk is mounted through fstab with options > noatime,nodiratime,data=ordered,nofail. > >> Do you have some other process running that mointors the filesystem

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Davor Josipovic
> Are you running Linux or Windows? Is the disk local or networked? Server is Debian 9.3. Disk is mounted through fstab with options noatime,nodiratime,data=ordered,nofail. > Do you have some other process running that mointors the filesystem or > the repository? Does it actively delete

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Davor Josipovic
> Are you running Linux or Windows? Is the disk local or networked? Server is Debian 9.3. Disk is mounted through fstab with options noatime,nodiratime,data=ordered,nofail. > Do you have some other process running that mointors the filesystem or > the repository? Does it actively delete

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Davor Josipovic
> Are you running Linux or Windows? Is the disk local or networked? Server is Debian 9.3. Disk is mounted through fstab with options noatime,nodiratime,data=ordered,nofail. > Do you have some other process running that mointors the filesystem or > the repository? Does it actively delete

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Philip Martin
Davor Josipovic writes: >> Do you see the DELETE in the log after the failed MERGE? Was there an >> error? > > The apache2 log I posted is the whole log for that day as far as I > recall. There was nothing else. You see the DELETE error before the > MERGE error. I think that is

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Davor Josipovic
> Do you see the DELETE in the log after the failed MERGE? Was there an > error? The apache2 log I posted is the whole log for that day as far as I recall. There was nothing else. You see the DELETE error before the MERGE error. I think that is due to a timing issue. In my previous tries

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Davor Josipovic
> Do you see the DELETE in the log after the failed MERGE? Was there an > error? The apache2 log I posted is the whole log for that day as far as I recall. There was nothing else. You see the DELETE error before the MERGE error. I think that is due to a timing issue. In my previous tries

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Davor Josipovic
> Do you see the DELETE in the log after the failed MERGE? Was there an > error? The apache2 log I posted is the whole log for that day as far as I recall. There was nothing else. You see the DELETE error before the MERGE error. I think that is due to a timing issue. In my previous tries

Re: enhancement suggestion

2018-02-20 Thread Branko Čibej
On 20.02.2018 15:59, Johan Corveleyn wrote: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Christian Klie wrote: >> Hello, >> currently I made a huge commit. In respect of the number of the files (see >> attachment "working copy"). >> While the commit went down the transaction grew and grew and

Re: enhancement suggestion

2018-02-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 1:11 PM, Christian Klie wrote: > Hello, > currently I made a huge commit. In respect of the number of the files (see > attachment "working copy"). > While the commit went down the transaction grew and grew and grew (see > attachment "transaction"). > That all

Save the date: ApacheCon North America, September 24-27 in Montréal

2018-02-20 Thread Rich Bowen
Dear Apache Enthusiast, (You’re receiving this message because you’re subscribed to a user@ or dev@ list of one or more Apache Software Foundation projects.) We’re pleased to announce the upcoming ApacheCon [1] in Montréal, September 24-27. This event is all about you — the Apache project

Re: Bugreport: invalid xml file produced by: svn log --xml --verbose --use-merge-history --search "msg1"

2018-02-20 Thread Martin Obermeir
Hi all, I entered this bug to the issue tracker last year: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4711 Should I also post it to the development list (d...@subversion.apache.org )? Thanks On 13.12.2017 10:08, Johan Corveleyn wrote: +1

Re: Reference to non-existent node

2018-02-20 Thread Philip Martin
Johan Corveleyn writes: >> [Sat Feb 10 03:25:30.640591 2018] [dav:error] [pid 2966] [client >> X.X.X.X:61712] Could not MERGE resource "/svn/repo/!svn/txn/463-e8" into >> "/svn/repo/repofolder". [500, #0] >> [Sat Feb 10 03:25:30.642889 2018] [dav:error] [pid 2966]

Re: Not so cheap moves

2018-02-20 Thread Eliop
Johan Corveleyn escribió el 20/02/2018 10:57:46: > On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Ignacio González (Eliop) > wrote: > > "Branko Čibej" wrote: > >> On 19.02.2018 15:40, Ignacio González (Eliop) wrote: > >>> Client svn 1.8.13 > >>> Server svn

Re: Not so cheap moves

2018-02-20 Thread Johan Corveleyn
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:35 AM, Ignacio González (Eliop) wrote: > "Branko Čibej" wrote: >> On 19.02.2018 15:40, Ignacio González (Eliop) wrote: >>> Client svn 1.8.13 >>> Server svn 1.8.13 on Centos 7 64 bit >>> - >>> I have a repository with 400 000 revisions.

re: Not so cheap moves

2018-02-20 Thread Eliop
"Branko Čibej" wrote: > On 19.02.2018 15:40, Ignacio González (Eliop) wrote: >> Client svn 1.8.13 >> Server svn 1.8.13 on Centos 7 64 bit >> - >> I have a repository with 400 000 revisions. >> Proyect X in that repository has the usual trunk / branches / tags >> structure. >> Tags are

[no subject]

2018-02-20 Thread Eliop
"Branko Čibej" wrote: > On 19.02.2018 15:40, Ignacio González (Eliop) wrote: >> Client svn 1.8.13 >> Server svn 1.8.13 on Centos 7 64 bit >> - >> I have a repository with 400 000 revisions. >> Proyect X in that repository has the usual trunk / branches / tags >> structure. >> Tags are