Re: Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-19 Thread Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
On 2021/02/17 6:17, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > On 16.02.2021 23:52, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: >> > >>> However, I don't think it is not an issue of Subversion release tarball >>> but an issue of FreeBSD ports. >> >> This may be incorrect. It seems it is caused by wrong rule of >> copy-swig-py:

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 16.02.2021 23:52, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: However, I don't think it is not an issue of Subversion release tarball but an issue of FreeBSD ports. This may be incorrect. It seems it is caused by wrong rule of copy-swig-py: target. Yep, it is wrong in case of multi-job build. It works

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 16.02.2021 21:59, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote: Thank you! That is immensely helpful. Now we can check when and why that change was introduced. However, I don't think it is not an issue of Subversion release tarball but an issue of FreeBSD ports. This issue is result to update to 1.14.1. I

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
In article <210217035914.m0144...@mkii.yf.bsdclub.org> futat...@yf.bsdclub.org writes: > However, I don't think it is not an issue of Subversion release tarball > but an issue of FreeBSD ports. This may be incorrect. It seems it is caused by wrong rule of copy-swig-py: target. > Perhaps

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread futatuki
In article hartman.nat...@gmail.com writes: > Are you building from a distribution tarball? (As opposed to a > checkout or export of the 1.14.1 tag in our repository...) If so, did > you run autogen.sh? I noticed some changes in > subversion/bindings/swig/INSTALL on trunk that haven't been

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
In article hartman.nat...@gmail.com writes: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:32 PM Lev Serebryakov > wrote: > > I found cause, but as I'm not python programmer, I don't understand it. > > > > Old "import _XXX" (like "import _core" in > > subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.py) works, new "from

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Nathan Hartman wrote on Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:15 +00:00: > You can generate a diff to view the changes with: > > $ svn diff \ > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/bindings/swig/INSTALL\ >

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:32 PM Lev Serebryakov wrote: > I found cause, but as I'm not python programmer, I don't understand it. > > Old "import _XXX" (like "import _core" in > subversion/bindings/swig/python/core.py) works, new "from . import XXX" > doesn't. > >I've patched these lines

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 16.02.2021 20:15, Nathan Hartman wrote: Update to 1.14.1 break out-of-tree build of python bindings (with python 3.7). Are you building from a distribution tarball? (As opposed to a checkout or export of the 1.14.1 tag in our repository...) If so, did you run autogen.sh? I noticed

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Lev Serebryakov
On 16.02.2021 19:51, Yasuhito FUTATSUKI wrote:   Update to 1.14.1 break out-of-tree build of python bindings (with python 3.7).   1.14.0 works with same options, makefiles, etc. 1.14.1 fails to build bindings when libraries are installed and swig is not installed (bindings are built as

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:05 AM Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > >Update to 1.14.1 break out-of-tree build of python bindings (with python > 3.7). Are you building from a distribution tarball? (As opposed to a checkout or export of the 1.14.1 tag in our repository...) If so, did you run

Re: subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Yasuhito FUTATSUKI
Hi, On 2021/02/17 0:04, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > >   Update to 1.14.1 break out-of-tree build of python bindings (with python > 3.7). >   1.14.0 works with same options, makefiles, etc. 1.14.1 fails to build > bindings when libraries are installed and swig is not installed (bindings are >

subversion 1.14.1: could not build python bindings (1.41.0 is Ok)

2021-02-16 Thread Lev Serebryakov
Update to 1.14.1 break out-of-tree build of python bindings (with python 3.7). 1.14.0 works with same options, makefiles, etc. 1.14.1 fails to build bindings when libraries are installed and swig is not installed (bindings are built as separate ntity, not together with subversion