Branko Čibej wrote on Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 13:34:04 +0200:
> On 04.07.2018 13:25, Michael Ruder wrote:
> > Is this really an intentional change? It results in our case in a huge
> > amount of duplicated ACL entries and seems a rather drastic change
> > regarding backwards compatibility.
>
> This
On 04.07.2018 13:25, Michael Ruder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we used up to and including svn 1.9 an authz file of the format
>
> [groups]
> company = user1, user2, user3
> customer = customer1, customer2
>
> # company can read-write on everything
> [/]
> @company = rw
>
> [project1:/]
> @customer = r
>
>
Hi,
we used up to and including svn 1.9 an authz file of the format
[groups]
company = user1, user2, user3
customer = customer1, customer2
# company can read-write on everything
[/]
@company = rw
[project1:/]
@customer = r
[project2:/]
This gave company full rights on both project1 and
