sebb wrote on Fri, 14 May 2021 11:44 +00:00:
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 12:22, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > sebb wrote on Thu, 13 May 2021 14:29 +00:00:
> > > > Is it misspelt?
> >
> > ITYM "misspelled" ;-)
>
> No, I am using British English.
I know. That's what the emoticon was there to
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 12:22, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
> sebb wrote on Thu, 13 May 2021 14:29 +00:00:
> > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 15:16, sebb wrote:
> > > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 15:11, Daniel Shahaf
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > sebb wrote on Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:49:41 +0100:
> > > > > As the
sebb wrote on Thu, 13 May 2021 14:29 +00:00:
> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 15:16, sebb wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 15:11, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > >
> > > sebb wrote on Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:49:41 +0100:
> > > > As the subject says
> > >
> > > Assuming opener.open() actually returns a URL, I
Furthermore, the method does not actually return a URL.
The method behaves like the following:
https://python.readthedocs.io/en/v2.7.2/library/urllib2.html#urllib2.urlopen
On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 15:16, sebb wrote:
>
> The problem is that it is not clear whether the variable is supposed
> to be
The problem is that it is not clear whether the variable is supposed
to be used or not.
Is it misspelt?
AIUI the convention for intentionally unused variables is to prefix
the name with an underscore, as this no longer triggers the warning in
PyLint
On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 15:11, Daniel Shahaf
sebb wrote on Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:49:41 +0100:
> As the subject says
Assuming opener.open() actually returns a URL, I don't see the problem
here. The variable documents the return type for anyone who may want
to extend the function.
As the subject says
