-Original Message-
From: James Hanley [mailto:jhan...@dgtlrift.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2014 2:47 AM
To: Ben Reser
Cc: users@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: Keyword expansion from merged changes
So in my opinion I don't think this is a good suggested feature
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On 1/2/14, 7:16 PM, James Hanley wrote:
I've used the Rev keyword in some of our code, and we noticed that there
may be
a use case gap for the Rev/Revision and possibly Id keyword.
As expected the keyword gets updated with
On 03.01.2014 17:59, James Hanley wrote:
Can you expand on this - I am missing where the preceding differences
would be an issue. From what I can see, if there is a delta, it is
either the result of direct modification or a merge
There is no guarantee that committed changes are the result of
On 1/3/14, 8:59 AM, James Hanley wrote:
Can you expand on this - I am missing where the preceding differences would be
an issue. From what I can see, if there is a delta, it is either the result
of
direct modification or a merge - if the former, that would be the rev
expanding
the
On Jan 3, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
On 1/3/14, 8:59 AM, James Hanley wrote:
Can you expand on this - I am missing where the preceding differences would
be
an issue. From what I can see, if there is a delta, it is either the result
of
direct modification or a
On 1/2/14, 7:16 PM, James Hanley wrote:
I've used the Rev keyword in some of our code, and we noticed that there may
be
a use case gap for the Rev/Revision and possibly Id keyword.
As expected the keyword gets updated with any checkin, but there may be a need
to have a merge-history aware
