Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in
so may aspects that maybe, it could have been for configuration type.
Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 12:44, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a écrit :
I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be
I was just asking if it could be possible to add new custom configuration
types. I've already develop what i need and I'm building the tree myself.
It works well and it is very clear on how to contribute to the service.
This email's purpose was to acquire more knowledge about tapestry.
Le mar. 5
On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote:
Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible
in so may aspects
Indeed it is . . .
that maybe, it could have been for configuration type.
But one of the most important ways Tapestry-IoC
Ok, so you don't think it should be a core concept but you also don't want
to build the tree yourself? Something's gotta give!
It's probably best to define the interface you'd like to interact with /
contribute to. I'm sure there's a tapestry-ioc friendly way to achieve what
you want.
I thought that tapestry was doing magic... I'm disapointed :D
Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 14:49, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
a écrit :
On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote:
Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible
Haha !
The more concise is the answer, the more efficient we are :D Thanks :)
Le lun. 4 mai 2015 à 23:00, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com
a écrit :
On Mon, 04 May 2015 09:13:22 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote:
But i want to know if adding a configuration type is
I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be
different case by case. The TypeCoercer and it's CoercionTuple are another
example of a tree like structure being built by an UnorderedConfiguration.
https://tapestry.apache.org/type-coercion.html
On 4 May 2015 13:14,
You could probably achieve this with an OrderedConfigurationNodeConfig
Eg:
public interface NodeConfig() {
public String getName();
public String getParentName(); //optional
public ListString getChildNames(); // optional
}
After all contributions, you could build a tree of nodes by
Thanks for your input Lance, you pictured what i had in mind when i was
talking about the workaround.
But i want to know if adding a configuration type is something that is
doable ?
Le lun. 4 mai 2015 à 13:51, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a écrit :
You could probably achieve this with
On Mon, 04 May 2015 09:13:22 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote:
But i want to know if adding a configuration type is something that is
doable ?
No.
(I guess I've just broken my record on the shortest answer in this mailing
list, hehehe)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry,
Hey tapestry users,
I need to retrieve in a service a configuration in a tree structure. I'd
like to add a new service configuration type in order to achieve this.
Is it possible ?
I could have a workaround by having each contributed element stating their
parent and build the tree in my service
11 matches
Mail list logo
