Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-09 Thread Jan Vissers
Thank you for pointing that out! Go out and vote! Michael Lake wrote: Rather than posting to the list, it'd probably be more helpful to vote on the issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1304 -m Mark Horn wrote: I would be interested in portlet support in T5 On 1/9/08,

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-09 Thread Michael Lake
Rather than posting to the list, it'd probably be more helpful to vote on the issue here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1304 -m Mark Horn wrote: I would be interested in portlet support in T5 On 1/9/08, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Seems like my question/thread

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-09 Thread Mark Horn
I would be interested in portlet support in T5 On 1/9/08, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like my question/thread got hijacked. Just to set the record > straight - I am not a fan of Wicket! > > I'm just interested in wondering whether Portlet Support in T5 is a wish > that more of u

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-09 Thread Jan Vissers
Seems like my question/thread got hijacked. Just to set the record straight - I am not a fan of Wicket! I'm just interested in wondering whether Portlet Support in T5 is a wish that more of us share - only this way, we can try to convince T5's crew to add it in the first release. Regards, -J

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-04 Thread Angelo Turetta
Fravia HCU wrote: Somewhere in Utrecht, Francis Amanfo is laughing. As for the book, I'm sure it will be a boon for Wicket developers. I enjoyed his T4 sample book. Maybe you can ask Kent directly instead of trolling. He IS Francis Amanfo. Look at: http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?p

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-04 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Jan 4, 2008 12:09 AM, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > I read somewhere some time back that Kent Tong, a Tapestry commiter, is > writing a book on Wicket. Anyone has info on the status of this? And Kent, > if your reading, could you please shed some light on the availabilit

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-03 Thread Fravia HCU
Somewhere in Utrecht, Francis Amanfo is laughing. As for the book, I'm sure it will be a boon for Wicket developers. I enjoyed his T4 sample book. Maybe you can ask Kent directly instead of trolling. On Jan 3, 2008 6:09 PM, Emmanuel Sowah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guys, > > I read somewher

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-03 Thread Emmanuel Sowah
Guys, I read somewhere some time back that Kent Tong, a Tapestry commiter, is writing a book on Wicket. Anyone has info on the status of this? And Kent, if your reading, could you please shed some light on the availability of your book on Wicket? Regards, Emmanuel On Jan 3, 2008 10:11 PM, Chris

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-03 Thread Yunhua Sang
> > Emmanuel, > > please cease with your regurgitated points > and annotations. We all know. We also all know about Wicket. It too is a > respectable and highly visible framework. Your points, which now are > just rants, are falling on dead ears here. If you seek an audience, > kindly find a more r

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-03 Thread Chris Lewis
Emmanuel, I have not been using tapestry long. In fact it was only a few months ago that I first heard of tapestry 4, at which point I bought Kent Tong's book and began examining its possible use. Until tapestry I had avoided web development in Java because I could not justify the time it too

Re: JSR-168/JSR-286 revisited --- what's happening at the 'neighbours'

2008-01-03 Thread Emmanuel Sowah
Wao, this Wicket framework is becoming hotter and hotter each day. Worth taking a serious look at it. On Jan 2, 2008 9:06 PM, Jan Vissers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://wicket.apache.org/ > > Apart from wicket also switching to slf4j, the new version now also > supports JSR-168/JSR-286. Appa