Great, thanks, that solves my problem.
My confusion was that I had not realized that I would get the same exception
even without contributing or referencing any translator, because I was binding
my TextField to a Date and not to a String so a translator was needed in any
case.
My goal is
Javascript is using dom.scanner function which should execute on every zone
change.Just like the DateField
Can you please check whether the function passed to dom.scanner is executed
when you add or remove rows?
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:42 AM, akshay akshayestat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Also can you please update to latest tapestry 5.4-beta-31
I think there was a bug that looks like that and got fixed.
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Javascript is using dom.scanner function which should execute on every
zone change.Just like
Hi,
Thank you Akshay Dimitris.
Just a quick note on the things I have now tried, and the outcome.
I tried Ashkay's example but seemed to run into some problems, mainly
that I don't know exactly where to put this code as it is using a js
module, the function is also anonymous so I was a bit
Hi,
Just to add to that - when I press remove row, this function also is
not called (at least, the alert doesn't show). Only when the page
loads.
Thanks,
Steve
On 4 May 2015 at 11:56, Stephen Nutbrown steves...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thank you Akshay Dimitris.
Just a quick note on the
When I remove, the console says:
Executing 0 inits
console.js:104 All inits executed
Thanks,
Steve
On 4 May 2015 at 12:04, Stephen Nutbrown steves...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Just to add to that - when I press remove row, this function also is
not called (at least, the alert doesn't show). Only
You could probably achieve this with an OrderedConfigurationNodeConfig
Eg:
public interface NodeConfig() {
public String getName();
public String getParentName(); //optional
public ListString getChildNames(); // optional
}
After all contributions, you could build a tree of nodes by
Thanks for your input Lance, you pictured what i had in mind when i was
talking about the workaround.
But i want to know if adding a configuration type is something that is
doable ?
Le lun. 4 mai 2015 à 13:51, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a écrit :
You could probably achieve this with
Hi,
Thanks again Dimitris. I really really appreciate your help, it's now
fixed - I got there in the end, and it's looking very good too.
Just a few things which may help anyone else who comes across this issue:
I've spent a fair bit of time looking up exactly how to override that
js (I found
Hi,
Fantastic - thank you. I've updated my AppModule with this change.
I appreciate all your help,
Thanks,
Steve
On 4 May 2015 at 18:04, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote:
HI
Your contribution to ModuleManager is correct.It will be better though to
inject the resource
Like
On Mon, 04 May 2015 09:13:22 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote:
But i want to know if adding a configuration type is something that is
doable ?
No.
(I guess I've just broken my record on the shortest answer in this mailing
list, hehehe)
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry,
11 matches
Mail list logo
