Re: New service configuration type

2015-05-05 Thread Charlouze
Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in so may aspects that maybe, it could have been for configuration type. Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 12:44, Lance Java lance.j...@googlemail.com a écrit : I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be

Re: New service configuration type

2015-05-05 Thread Charlouze
I was just asking if it could be possible to add new custom configuration types. I've already develop what i need and I'm building the tree myself. It works well and it is very clear on how to contribute to the service. This email's purpose was to acquire more knowledge about tapestry. Le mar. 5

Re: New service configuration type

2015-05-05 Thread Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo
On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote: Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible in so may aspects Indeed it is . . . that maybe, it could have been for configuration type. But one of the most important ways Tapestry-IoC

Re: New service configuration type

2015-05-05 Thread Lance Java
Ok, so you don't think it should be a core concept but you also don't want to build the tree yourself? Something's gotta give! It's probably best to define the interface you'd like to interact with / contribute to. I'm sure there's a tapestry-ioc friendly way to achieve what you want.

Re: New service configuration type

2015-05-05 Thread Charlouze
I thought that tapestry was doing magic... I'm disapointed :D Le mar. 5 mai 2015 à 14:49, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com a écrit : On Tue, 05 May 2015 09:36:55 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote: Me neither. I was asking for this feature because tapestry is extensible

tapestry split button

2015-05-05 Thread Chung Khanh Duy
Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks.

Re: New service configuration type

2015-05-05 Thread Charlouze
Haha ! The more concise is the answer, the more efficient we are :D Thanks :) Le lun. 4 mai 2015 à 23:00, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo thiag...@gmail.com a écrit : On Mon, 04 May 2015 09:13:22 -0300, Charlouze m...@charlouze.com wrote: But i want to know if adding a configuration type is

Re: tapestry split button

2015-05-05 Thread Dimitris Zenios
Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi experts, Do you know any example about mixins for split button for Tapestry ? I appreciate. Thanks.

Re: tapestry split button

2015-05-05 Thread Chung Khanh Duy
Hi, Yes, it is similar with http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: Hi By split button you mean bootstrap button groups? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Chung Khanh Duy

Re: tapestry split button

2015-05-05 Thread Chung Khanh Duy
I intend to write a new component and use it many places in project if possible. That is the reason why I am finding a good example for mixins. Example you can use t:button as usual and then assign the mixins if you want it as dropdown button. Thanks. On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Dimitris

Re: tapestry split button

2015-05-05 Thread Chung Khanh Duy
Thanks for your suggestion. I will On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Dimitris Zenios dimitris.zen...@gmail.com wrote: I would go with a custom component directly instead of button and mixin On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to

Re: tapestry split button

2015-05-05 Thread Dimitris Zenios
Why do you need a mixin for that.This is plain html there.What exactly are trying to achieve? On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Yes, it is similar with http://foundation.zurb.com/docs/components/split_buttons.html. Thanks. On Tue,

Re: tapestry split button

2015-05-05 Thread Dimitris Zenios
I would go with a custom component directly instead of button and mixin On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Chung Khanh Duy chungkhanhduy1...@gmail.com wrote: I intend to write a new component and use it many places in project if possible. That is the reason why I am finding a good example for

Re: New service configuration type

2015-05-05 Thread Lance Java
I'm not convinced that this should be a core concept as it's likely to be different case by case. The TypeCoercer and it's CoercionTuple are another example of a tree like structure being built by an UnorderedConfiguration. https://tapestry.apache.org/type-coercion.html On 4 May 2015 13:14,