Hello,
Thanks for your respawn but my problem is the size of file to download and
not the numbers of simultanous download.
bye,
Jean-Bernard BRIAND
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
the last years I developed my webapps with tomcat and Linux. Because of my new
employer I have to use windows now. But there occurs a problem. At the moment I
debug my webapp.
With Tomcat and Linux I just have to restart the server and the container is
completely erased. After the
This is not an expected behaviour.
Any errors on the mod_jk or the tomcat side?
What are your mod_jk settings (Jk* ind httpd.conf and
workers.properties), what are your AJP13 connector settings on the
tomcat side?
Regards,
Rainer
Jean-Bernard BRIAND wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your respawn
Hello,
now I noticed, that it is enough to restart my browser. The browser restart is
needed by IE and Firefox. With Linux I don't need to restart the Firefox to see
the changes from the restarted web server. What is the reason for that
behaviour?
I use the session-mechanism from the tomcat -
In single linux machine, after running Apache, per each account each tomcat
is running for web hosting service.
In a while after, although running just one or two tomcats, the websites
which were properly running on the explorer no longer respond. I think
tomcat process is still on but the
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
I use WordNetProcessor in many JSP files and it seems if I use it in
static way using
%! static WordNetProcessor wordNetProcessor=new WordNetProcessor(); %
it won't lock many files.
then your WordNetProcessor class is probably buggy. Maybe you should
show us your code to
You misunderstand the answer
If you're not using a DB to handle the storage of these large units AND
If you're not using any type of CompressionFilter
then you will have to break up your transmission to individual fragments inside
threads
and then reassemble the individual these fragments at
Hi,
I'm sorry to bother you all, but I need to know is there a way to setup an
ASP.NET HttpHandler-like servlet or something similar on Tomcat 5.x?!
I'd basically just like to have all of the same file extension requests to
be processed with just one servlet?! Is that at all possible!?
I
There's a lot of framework that do just that.
Try spring framework
www.springframework.org, there's a tutorial in the site that introduced
spring MVC
You will be very happy after
On 9/24/06, nubie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry to bother you all, but I need to know is there a way
Martin Gainty wrote:
Umm no.
If you're not using a DB to handle the storage of these large units AND
How data is stored has no impact on how it is transmitted.
If you're not using any type of CompressionFilter
then you will have to break up your transmission to individual fragments
Hi Mladen,
On 9/24/06, Mladen Adamovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leon Rosenberg wrote:
I use WordNetProcessor in many JSP files and it seems if I use it in
static way using
%! static WordNetProcessor wordNetProcessor=new WordNetProcessor(); %
it won't lock many files.
then your
I've put System.gc() in one place in the code and I'm seeing that lsof
| wc -l shows that my web application uses less file descriptors as
time go on :)
I hope the server won't run out of available file descriptors in the future.
Also, I've put in /etc/profile.local the line ulimit -n 8192,
On Saturday 23 September 2006 15:23, David Smith wrote:
Correction: context.xml belongs in META-INF of the war archive.
I have just conducted experiments with Tomcat 5.0
putting a context.xml file in META-INF doesn't appear to work
I have not been having success with putting in
Mr. Lau,
Thank you very much for this batch file, it was a great help in
getting tomcat 5.5.17 running on my 64bit win2k3 install.
May I ask if you would possibly add some java memory management
options to the batch file so that it may take advantage of the 64bit
jvm?
With great appreciation
Or you can simply map all the file extension URLs to the servlet of your
choice. A framework is *not* required. Google for servlet-mapping.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Lung Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 10:09 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re:
You are Right tim much easier,
but how do you know from which url that the request have been send?
which object give you this kinda information?
On 9/24/06, Tim Lucia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or you can simply map all the file extension URLs to the servlet of your
choice. A framework is *not*
getPathInfo()
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.2.1/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/http/HttpServl
etRequest.html#getPathInfo()
getRequestURI()
http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.2.1/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/http/HttpServl
etRequest.html#getRequestURI()
-Original Message-
From: Lung Chan
Hi Mark,
Thanks for refereeing to this link. However when I looked at server.xml that
I have on my tamcat installation it does not show any attribute with name
maxPostSize. Here is my server.xml attached.
Please let me know how to configure it.
Thanks
Sandeep Darvekar
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep Darvekar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Upload Exception - Time out error
Thanks for refereeing to this link. However when I looked at
server.xml that I have on my tamcat installation it does not
show any attribute with name maxPostSize.
Read the doc, not your
Just to reconfirm, my server.xml should have connector element as
Connector port=8085 maxPostSize=10485760 maxHttpHeaderSize=8192
maxThreads=150 minSpareThreads=25 maxSpareThreads=75
enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=100
The connector element you posted has it correctly. I wouldn't try the
short form 10MB though -- the docs don't mention that as a valid way
of expressing the value.
As far as updating a production service, it's always best to try it in a
parallel test environment. If that's not an option,
Mladen Adamovic wrote:
Also, I've put in /etc/profile.local the line ulimit -n 8192, hoping
it will help.
WARNING: If you are unix the JVM uses the select() then increasing the
ulimit above the default 1024 maybe dangerous. This is because the
default select() usage set only allocates
22 matches
Mail list logo
