What is difference betn tomcat5.exe tomcat5w.exe?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/What-is-difference-betn-tomcat5.exe---tomcat5w.exe--tp30892610p30892610.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 02/10/2011 03:17 PM, André Warnier wrote:
raghvendra wrote:
What is difference betn tomcat5.exe tomcat5w.exe?
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=difference+tomcat5.exe+%26+tomcat5w.exe%3F
ROTFL
Cheers
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe,
On 10/02/2011 15:44, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/10/2011 03:17 PM, André Warnier wrote:
raghvendra wrote:
What is difference betn tomcat5.exe tomcat5w.exe?
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=difference+tomcat5.exe+%26+tomcat5w.exe%3F
only problem with that site is that invariably Google's first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reinwald,
On 2/9/2011 2:49 AM, Reinwald Warapen wrote:
On 2/9/2011 1:15 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I don't see any non-spec compliant behaviour here, just a broken user
agent.
I dont think all the user agents are broken. Cause this happened on IE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed,
On 2/9/2011 3:01 PM, Edward Bicker wrote:
I agree, I have enjoying Charles remarks and comments as well.
I say to PID, he needs to PIDDLE off and leave us alone.
/Ed
Mod down: troll. :(
Pid was right: you did hijack the thread.
He wasn't
Hi All,
Time for a mea culpa. In my original message, I said that this used to work
in 6.0.20. That's wasn't correct. The 6.0.20 version we were using was
patched to fix this very issue, but we had not applied that patch to the
6.0.29 build. When we patched the 6.0.29 code, all works as expected.
André Warnier wrote:
Giles Coochey wrote:
On 10/02/2011 15:44, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/10/2011 03:17 PM, André Warnier wrote:
raghvendra wrote:
What is difference betn tomcat5.exe tomcat5w.exe?
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=difference+tomcat5.exe+%26+tomcat5w.exe%3F
only problem with that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
On 2/10/2011 2:15 PM, André Warnier wrote:
Obviously, this list is popular with indexing engines..
It must be the scintillating banter. ;)
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
On 2/9/11 8:01 PM, Edward Bicker wrote:
I agree, I have enjoying Charles remarks and comments as well.
I say to PID, he needs to PIDDLE off and leave us alone.
/Ed
// eds_sense_of_humor is a little-known but primitive type
char *str = (char *)malloc(sizeof(eds_sense_of_humor));
free(str);
I apologize to PID...and to Charles. I was just trying
to say thank you to Charles.
Pid, I like your free(str) reference. Perhaps I am full of Malloc.
/Ed
-Original Message-
From: Pid p...@pidster.com
Sent: Feb 10, 2011 4:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re:
Hi,
short question, I read in the http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
that a possible DoS attack vulnerability has been fixed in Request
class.
Does that mean that CVE-2010-4476 is
a) not an issue with 6.0.32++
b) not an issue unless the app uses Double.parseDouble
c) probably not in issue
Hi!
I have configuration consisting of:
IIS6 on MS Windows Server 2003 R2 Standard Edition SP2
Java 6u23
Tomcat 5.5.32
isapi_redirect 1.2.31
The problem is that each thing separately seems to work but all together not :-(
I've configured context analytics on Tomcat and it works. When I
request
12 matches
Mail list logo