Re: [ANN] Apache Tomcat 7.0.11 released

2011-03-12 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/03/2011 19:17, David Calavera wrote: Hi Mark, could you remember to release the maven artifacts, I've seen the last version released was 7.0.8. 7.0.11 Maven deploy started now. It'll take a couple of hours to complete and it'll need to sync to Maven central. I've never checked just how

Re: Tomcat 5.5.30 and Spring Framework

2011-03-12 Thread André Warnier
Aureliusz R. wrote: Borut, thanks again. You were correct, it was lazy initialization. Pretty much at this point I got the spring part working. I've encountered yet another issue with mapping requests from apache2 web server to tomcat. It seems to have something to do with SSL, as I don't have

Re: Tomcat 5.5.30 and Spring Framework

2011-03-12 Thread Borut Hadžialić
The docBase for my app is /usr/local/jsp/ I've placed my spring test JSP in /usr/local/jsp/testSpring/testSpring.jsp You probably want your's app docBase to be something like /usr/local/myapp, and then have your jsp's in a directory /usr/local/myapp/WEB-INF/jsp/ - eg.

Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7

2011-03-12 Thread David Kerber
I've thought about that, but I would think I would be maxing out the cpu if tomcat's processing were the limit. I'm running only about 8% cpu usage across all 4 cpu's. On 3/11/2011 4:23 PM, Tony Anecito wrote: Hi David, I recently ran performance tests against version 7 and during that

Re: JSP class size increase in Tomcat 7

2011-03-12 Thread Jess Holle
On 3/11/2011 6:04 AM, Jess Holle wrote: On 3/11/2011 3:22 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: The obvious difference is that Tomcat 6 compilation targets Java 5 whereas Tomcat 7 targets Java 6. For a simple test JSP: Tomcat 6 (1.5) - 3,488 Tomcat 7 (1.5) - 3,530 +1% Tomcat 7 (1.6) - 3,668 +6% The 1% will

Re: JSP class size increase in Tomcat 7

2011-03-12 Thread Jess Holle
Nevermind -- I examined other classes produced with 1.5 specified. These were compiled for 1.5 (version 49.0 byte code). On another ugly JSP, I note: * Tomcat 6 - JDT targeting 1.5: 93K * Tomcat 7 - JDT targeting 1.6: 149K * Tomcat 7 - JDT targeting 1.5: 133K * Tomcat 7 - javac

Re: Performance 5.5 vs 6 vs 7

2011-03-12 Thread Peter Crowther
On 11 March 2011 20:02, David kerber dcker...@verizon.net wrote: I've already checked my connection bandwidth, and that still has some headroom, though not a lot. What's not a lot? If latency across the connection is starting to increase due to congestion, that could increase the time to

WebDav Configuration Question

2011-03-12 Thread Scott Dudley
I'm running Tomcat 6.0.24 on Ubuntu 10.04.2 LTS. I'm trying to configure WebDav and limit access to a single folder, a subdirectory of my applications www folder... i.e. www/myapp/subdir. I want to limit access only to subdir and disable the clients ability to create any new directories.

Re: Fastest way to upgrade from 7.0.10 to 7.0.11?

2011-03-12 Thread Brian Braun
Hi Mark, Thanks a lot for your response. I did agree with Charles regarding the usually bad idea about just replacing JARs, but in this specific case (7.0.10 to 7.0.11) I suspected it could be done just replacing JARs. I will try it definitely. On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Mark Thomas

Re: [OT] Migrated from 6.0.29 to 7.0.10, Now I get INFO: TLD skipped. URI: http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean is already defined

2011-03-12 Thread Brian Braun
Well, first of all, I'm using the 2004 Struts version. Why didn't I upgraded that over all these years? Because in the first years I thought I was going to migrate to JSF, and recetly I'm thinking that maybe I should go with Spring. For that reason, I didn't want to invest time upgrading to the

Re: StackOverFlowError in Tomcat 6.0.29

2011-03-12 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2011/3/12 Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50883 - From your bug report, this stack trace does not look right at all (...) - From that stack trace, it appears that ApplicationHttpRequest.setAttribute is calling

Re: Migrated from 6.0.29 to 7.0.10, Now I get INFO: TLD skipped. URI: http://struts.apache.org/tags-bean is already defined

2011-03-12 Thread Brian Braun
Hi Mark, I have been thinking about this issue, and I have some thoughts and questions. My web.xml file doesn't mention the TLDs, but I have confirmed that the Struts JAR does contain them. That is the reduncancy. I tried removing the TLDs from my WEB-INF directory, and the the info message was