On 06/09/2011 21:11, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling with
Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this Context
Hello:
I've got a web application running on Tomcat 7.0.16
It uses realm authentication to validate users ( FORM login method
with a custom login page named login.html)
and it's secured by SSL with
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
web-resource-namessl/web-resource-name
On 07/09/2011 12:20, Chema wrote:
Hello:
I've got a web application running on Tomcat 7.0.16
It uses realm authentication to validate users ( FORM login method
with a custom login page named login.html)
and it's secured by SSL with
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
Hello,
I've noticed a performance difference between classic Tags and simple Tags in
Tomcat 7.0.21 (also tested it on 7.0.6 with the same results).
Simple tags or tagfiles execution is at 5 times superior to classic tag
execution.
Classic tag execution is more or less the same than using no
Thanks but that didn't work for me
I've got
Connector SSLEnabled=true clientAuth=false
keystoreFile=C:\keystore.jks keystorePass=tomcat maxThreads=150
port=8443 protocol=HTTP/1.1 scheme=https secure=true
sslProtocol=TLS/
in my server.xml
And I've created a SessionTrackingModeListener (just
I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling with
Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this Context
org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:770)
Hi All,
I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling with
Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this Context
org.apache.naming.NamingContext.lookup(NamingContext.java:770)
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Gonzalez adr_gonza...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed a performance difference between classic Tags and simple Tags in
Tomcat 7.0.21 (also tested it on 7.0.6 with the same results).
Simple tags or tagfiles execution is at 5 times superior to
Anjib Mulepati anji...@hotmail.com schrieb:
Hi All,
I am trying to setup JNDI mapping for oracle JDBC Connection Pooling
with Tomcat 6.0.29. This is giving me following error
javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name dynic is not bound in this
From your code and configuration I would have
Yes I am positive
Anjib Man Mulepati
409-225-6216
Subject: Re: JNDI configuration with 6.0.29 Reformatted
From: felix.schumac...@internetallee.de
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:17:21 +0200
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Anjib Mulepati anji...@hotmail.com schrieb:
Hi All,
I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anjib,
On 9/7/2011 11:22 AM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
Yes I am positive
If you have changed your META-INF/context.xml without doing an
undeploy/redeploy, Tomcat may be using an older version of the
deployment descriptor than you think it is.
Take a
I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me. Following is the
content:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
Context antiJARLocking=true docBase=C:\Users\amulepati\My
Projects\ClientDAOTest\build\web path=/ClientDAOTest
Resource auth=Container
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anjib,
On 9/7/2011 12:21 PM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me. Following is
the content:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? Context
antiJARLocking=true docBase=C:\Users\amulepati\My
I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me. Following is
the content:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? Context
antiJARLocking=true docBase=C:\Users\amulepati\My
Projects\ClientDAOTest\build\web path=/ClientDAOTest
It probably has no bearing on this particular problem, but the path
I understand it, but it's reasonable to pay 20% CPU more (on code executed on
JSP side - not overall code). Here the difference is *5.
It appears to me a bit more than originally intended, don't you think ?
I'm new on tag files, so perhaps as you said it's just a feature for quick
prototyping
i change to
Resource name=jdbc/dynic
auth=Container
type=javax.sql.DataSource
driverClassName=oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver
url=jdbc:oracle:thin:@//localhost:4001/SAIDIT
user=sfed_schema
password=sfed_schema
On 07/09/2011 15:57, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Gonzalez adr_gonza...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed a performance difference between classic Tags and simple Tags
in Tomcat 7.0.21 (also tested it on 7.0.6 with the same results).
Simple tags or
Thanks for taking your time to look this issue !
- Mail original -
De : Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
À : Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Cc :
Envoyé le : Mercredi 7 Septembre 2011 19h13
Objet : Re: Performance issue in simpleTags and tagfiles
On 07/09/2011 15:57, Remy
All,
Kinda new to tomcat but have a couple quick questions which came up regarding
CVE-2011-3109 (Bug 51698).
Questions:
Any timeline to when stable release of 6.0.34 is supposed to be released?
Also what does in trunk specifically mean? Does that mean if I download say
version 6.0.29 as of
On 07/09/2011 18:37, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
Thanks for taking your time to look this issue !
Adding a cache for annotation scanning (that was taking most of the
time) was relatively simple. Are you willing to build Tomcat 7.0.x from
source and see if the new cache works for you?
Mark
-
Ouch, that was fast ! Thanks very much !
Are you willing to build Tomcat 7.0.x from source and see if the new cache
works for you?
- Of course ! Donno if I'm doing it now or tomorrow morning though - I'm a bit
ill at the moment ;(
sources are in trunk, right ?
Sorry, no real difference.
Even worse, I'm on my home computer and here I don't see anymore the *5
difference between simple tags and classic tags.
I'll continue these tests tomorrow at work (perhaps there's some file scanning
/ reading in action - and since I'm with AV software...).
- Tests
One more test at home (usin Sun Jdk 1.6.23).
Results are in nanosecond and correspond to generated JSP pages (loop with 1000
iteration is replaced with 1000 tags).
With this test I have simpleTag = 10 * classicTag.
An this ratio is the same in 7.0.21 or in trunk.
trunk
simple = 13461836
On 07/09/2011 20:36, Adrian Gonzalez wrote:
Sorry, no real difference.
Even worse, I'm on my home computer and here I don't see anymore the *5
difference between simple tags and classic tags.
The figures I saw were:
TestOP Me Cached
tagfile 500 328 203
classic 100
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anjib,
On 9/7/2011 12:57 PM, Anjib Mulepati wrote:
I did checked the XML file and it looks correct to me.
Following is the content:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? Context
antiJARLocking=true docBase=C:\Users\amulepati\My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
TC 7.0.20, httpd 2.2.16, mod_jk 1.2.30
I was trying to set up a secret for use with my AJP connector and I
got these two warnings:
Sep 7, 2011 6:09:20 PM
org.apache.catalina.startup.SetAllPropertiesRule begin
WARNING:
On 07/09/2011 23:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
All,
TC 7.0.20, httpd 2.2.16, mod_jk 1.2.30
I was trying to set up a secret for use with my AJP connector and
I got these two warnings:
Sep 7, 2011 6:09:20 PM
org.apache.catalina.startup.SetAllPropertiesRule begin WARNING:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Amit,
On 9/7/2011 2:30 PM, Anand, Amit (Contractor) wrote:
Kinda new to tomcat but have a couple quick questions which came
up regarding CVE-2011-3109 (Bug 51698).
Any timeline to when stable release of 6.0.34 is supposed to be
released?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 9/7/2011 6:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Am I missing something?
Yes. You haven't read the docs and you are using the wrong name
for the attribute. Try reading this:
pI have always worked hard for what I wanted I was sure I had reached a dead
end this completely exceeded my expectations.bra
href=http://208.112.68.178/StuartBennett33.html;http://208.112.68.178/StuartBennett33.html/a
this is proof that miracles do exist consider trying it for yourselfbr /p
Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 9/7/2011 6:18 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Am I missing something?
Yes. You haven't read the docs and you are using the wrong name
for the attribute. Try reading this:
PING! I also suffer from this but was previously too ashamed to ask.
:sigh:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Glen Mazza glen.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using Tomcat 7.0.14 on Ubuntu Linux and wanted to make the logging
in the logs/catalina.out file more detailed than INFO. So I adjusted
32 matches
Mail list logo
