Leon Rosenberg-3 wrote:
So you effectively measure the ability of tomcat to throw away your
bytes and send you an error page. That doesn't make really sense, does
it?
Leon
Of course not. The uploaded file is visible on the webpage in the new
directory where it's supposed to be.
--
Leon Rosenberg-3 wrote:
oh... then its magic...
ok i've tried it:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ curl -T xxx.txt http://localhost:8000/xxx/
htmlheadtitleApache Tomcat/5.5.16 - Error
report/titlestyle!--H1
FYI-
I've been using the curl command line client for the uploads and downloads.
When I tried the commons HttpClient from a java program, the upload/download
throughputs matched !! (at over 85% ).
regards,
Aman.
--
View this message in context:
Leon Rosenberg-3 wrote:
I ment rather how do you handle the upload in tomcat?
I have written any custom upload handlers. I just give the appropriate url
to the put client and it's done.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/file-upload-speed.-t1816944.html#a4974321
Sent
Leon Rosenberg-3 wrote:
I ment rather how do you handle the upload in tomcat?
I have not written any custom upload handlers on the web server side. I
just give the appropriate url to the put client and it's done.
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
I'm using Tomcat 5.5.15 to transfer files. I get a throughput of roughly 20%
on 100Mbps LAN whereas the download throughput is 95% approx.
How can I make the uploads faster ?
Thanks,
Aman.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/file-upload-speed.-t1816944.html#a4953136
Sent
Antonio,
I've done other experiments (without tomcat) where the upload speed is
better. There are no throughput constraints in the network/server
configuration. Unless it's internally imposed by tomcat webserver.
Are there any such constraints in tomcat ? is this throughput difference
deliberate