Re: Recommendations for Automating Deployments and then dev, qa, uat, prod testing

2010-01-24 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Fletcher Cocquyt fcocquyt at stanford.edu writes: Hi, this question is coming from the operations team perspective. Currently our (small 3 member) ops team is responsible for deploying java apps weekly from a set of dozens in a less than great 4am-6am window on Wednesdays. ..snip.. So

Recommendations for Automating Deployments and then dev, qa, uat, prod testing

2010-01-23 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Hi, this question is coming from the operations team perspective. Currently our (small 3 member) ops team is responsible for deploying java apps weekly from a set of dozens in a less than great 4am-6am window on Wednesdays. This process is not perfectly defined and slow - the developer's check

mod_jk MAX WORKERS

2009-06-24 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Hi, we have noticed when we get close to 150 workers/2000bytes defined in our worker.list - mod_jk 1.2.20 starts to break (could not find worker for worker name=xyz) Looking at the code - cause the release notes /changelog don't seem to mention this - looks like 1.2.28 has a new formula for

increase the backend idle connection timeout or the connection_pool_minsize

2007-02-26 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Hi, This is a followup to my Feb14 post: Re: socket is not connected any more (errno=11) I've just upgraded from 1.2.19 to 1.2.20 and the new log messages are: increase the backend idle connection timeout or the connection_pool_minsize I could not find much on which parameters this is

Re: increase the backend idle connection timeout or the connection_pool_minsize

2007-02-26 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Rainer Jung rainer.jung at kippdata.de writes: You can add connection_pool_minsize. See the workers.properties pages in the reference guide. I'm using apache 2.0 prefork - the docs: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/workers.html say Do not use connection_pool_size with

Re: increase the backend idle connection timeout or the connection_pool_minsize

2007-02-26 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Rainer Jung rainer.jung at kippdata.de writes: Yes, but the log message is talking about the min size. The default min size is size/2, but we changed it between 1.2.19 and 1.2.20 to (size+1)/2. So for prefork the min size was 0 until 1.2.19 and is 1 starting with 1.2.20. So I tried

Re: socket is not connected any more (errno=11)

2007-02-14 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Mladen Turk mladen.turk at gmail.com writes: Fletcher Cocquyt wrote: We have a problem with lost submissions in a loadbalanced (mod_jk) webapp and think these errors are related - what causes error number 11 and what can be done about it? This is correct behavior if Tomcat

socket is not connected any more (errno=11)

2007-02-13 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
We have a problem with lost submissions in a loadbalanced (mod_jk) webapp and think these errors are related - what causes error number 11 and what can be done about it? thanks! [Tue Feb 13 08:31:28 2007] [15238:0001] [info] ajp_send_request::jk_ajp_common.c (1170): (tomcat-intranet-02)

maintenance redirect best practice

2006-07-06 Thread Fletcher Cocquyt
Hi, we are tossing around different ideas on how to best manage web application maintenance redirect pages. That is do we update apache config to have the JkMount redirect to a tailored webapp 1/30 is down for maintenace (has someone coded a please check back in X minutes dynamic message form