Re: Comparing Tomcat Performance on Windows vs. Linux

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Czeiszperger
On Jan 5, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: On 1/5/06, Michael Czeiszperger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 5, 2006, at 3:39 PM, Jess Holle wrote: Also a Tomcat 5.5.12 (or better 5.5.15) with and without APR test against recent IBM, Sun, and BEA offerings would be really nice

Re: Comparing Tomcat Performance on Windows vs. Linux

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Czeiszperger
test. Michael Czeiszperger http://webperformance.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Comparing Tomcat Performance on Windows vs. Linux

2006-01-06 Thread Michael Czeiszperger
On Jan 6, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Remy Maucherat wrote: On 1/6/06, Michael Czeiszperger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 5, 2006, at 6:22 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote: Sorry, for the potentially redundant question, but to clarify, is the APR version of Tomcat officially released? The last time I

Comparing Tomcat Performance on Windows vs. Linux

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Czeiszperger
load, and shows there is a significant different in performance. Under the restricted conditions of the test Linux was able to handle 32% more load than Windows with identical versions of Tomcat on identical hardware. Michael Czeiszperger

Re: Comparing Tomcat Performance on Windows vs. Linux

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Czeiszperger
On Jan 5, 2006, at 2:24 PM, Tim Funk wrote: Interesting. In enterprise environments, I also hear it common to see antivirus software also run on windows servers too. (Yes, you read that correctly) I'd be curious to see how much or a performance decrease there is when one is turned on.

Re: Comparing Tomcat Performance on Windows vs. Linux

2006-01-05 Thread Michael Czeiszperger
, we would like to bring APR into the mix, but its not officially shipping on both platforms, or at least it wasn't when we started the testing. Michael Czeiszperger http://webperformance.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL