-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
On 2/17/2009 5:08 AM, Peter Crowther wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> IMHO, you either have control of your production environment
>> yourself (and can do whatever you want) or you have an ops team
>
> From: Ken Bowen [mailto:kbo...@als.com]
> The only thing more fiery than "language X is better than language Y"
> is "editor Z is better than editor W" :-)
To skip a few levels in the inevitable impending debate...
"Well I edited the inodes by hand. With magnets."
(http://www.userfriendly.o
The only thing more fiery than "language X is better than language Y"
is "editor Z is better than editor W" :-)
On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:45 AM, André Warnier wrote:
"language X is better than language Y"
-
To unsubscribe, e-
Just in case it was missed in the subsequent conflagration (and I always
marvel at how easy it is to start a conflagration by saying something
like "language X is better than language Y"), I would just like to state
that my blurb was meant to be taken lightly, with ;-) and so on.
Comparing pro
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> IMHO, you either
> have control of your production environment yourself (and can do
> whatever you want) or you have an ops team with complete
> control of your
> production environment (and they ought to be able to handle
> scary
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
> Do you mean gcc on win32 worked as you expected?
Yes, it produced the same results as Java.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/16/2009 5:19 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
>>
>> For instance.
>> i = i++
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
>
> For instance.
> i = i++
>
> yields different results depending on what language
> you are using. C and Java produce different outputs
>
Chris,
I offer my opinions here as a real "grey beard" (literally). I certainly
agree with you that people should have
a breath of skills allowing them to use the right tool at the right time.
However, notwithstanding the fact that the other day I worked out that I
have actually used about 15
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
André,
What the hell.. let's start a holy war?!
On 2/13/2009 10:25 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> Their merit is all the greater since
> they work in the obscure non-graphical background, they never get any of
> the attention, and they have to share mach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/12/2009 10:27 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
>>
>> I don't understand that,
Peter Crowther wrote:
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Hear, hear! In a past life, a guy I know actually wrote a
suite of production programs in APL - which was even more
cryptic (but also more logical) than Perl.
Dedication indeed! Did he need the custom golfbal
> From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
> Hear, hear! In a past life, a guy I know actually wrote a
> suite of production programs in APL - which was even more
> cryptic (but also more logical) than Perl.
Dedication indeed! Did he need the custom golfball for the teletyp
> From: Peter Crowther [mailto:peter.crowt...@melandra.com]
> Subject: RE: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
>
> Thank you. Although I don't need any further reasons to
> avoid that camel of a language whenever I can, it's always
> nice to find another re
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> I was going to let that one pass, but now I'm provoked.
> The expressions above do work differently in Perl.
[...]
> However, the calle sub can be cleverer and anticipate this, by doing :
> return wantarray ? (i++) : i++;
> thus checking in which con
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
I don't understand that, either. I suppose this works differently in
different languages, though:
return i++;
return (i++);
Not any
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: [OT] of the different methods to get a user-id
>
> I don't understand that, either. I suppose this works differently in
> different languages, though:
>
> return i++;
>
> return (i++);
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 2/12/2009 1:22 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>
> As Pid surmised, it's not Tomcat that is giving you different
> answers.
> Here's Tomcat's implementation of HttpServletRequest.getRemoteUser():
>
> public String getRemoteUser() {
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
