Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-11 Thread Micky Hulse
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:35 AM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote: Just be careful when doing this, that an undeploy of your application would not delete much more than what you are prepared for. Ahh, good tip. Had not realized that could be a possibility. Thanks André! :) Cheers, Micky

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-11 Thread André Warnier
Micky Hulse wrote: I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the help. I ended up downloading Tomcat directly from the Tomcat site and got that up-and-running super fast. In the end, I opted to not worry about spoofing/vhosting anything. Maybe down the road, but for right now I've been fine

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-10 Thread Micky Hulse
I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for the help. I ended up downloading Tomcat directly from the Tomcat site and got that up-and-running super fast. In the end, I opted to not worry about spoofing/vhosting anything. Maybe down the road, but for right now I've been fine with symlinking my

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Hassan Schroeder
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:04 PM, Micky Hulse mickyhu...@gmail.com wrote: I'm using Bitnami's Tomcat 8.0.18-0 Dev (64-bit) installer for OS X Yosemite. Why? Download the real thing, untar, done. No questions about packaging issues. Who knows what this thing does?

“Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Micky Hulse
Hello, I'm using Bitnami's Tomcat 8.0.18-0 Dev (64-bit) installer for OS X Yosemite. Here's my relevant code: https://gist.github.com/mhulse/9c1278fa73a7a62be8ef I have a `hosts` entry for 127.0.0.1 spoofing `tomcat.local`. Problem: I can't get the vhost working without the port number.

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Micky Hulse
Thanks for tips Hassan! I really appreciate it! I'll follow your suggestions and take another stab at it. I'll post back here with my results. On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Hassan Schroeder hassan.schroe...@gmail.com wrote: Why? Download the real thing, untar, done. No questions about

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Zala Pierre GOUPIL
Good evening, If you use Tomcat alone (without Apache or any other web servers), you'll have to find a way to have it listen on the port 80 (there a some of them available on the web). Because Tomcat uses the port 8080 by default. In such a situation, you can't remove the port number: no port

Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Zala Pierre GOUPIL
Ho, just to be sure: never ever launch Tomcat with root privileges. Right? :-) On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Zala Pierre GOUPIL goupilpie...@gmail.com wrote: Good evening, If you use Tomcat alone (without Apache or any other web servers), you'll have to find a way to have it listen on the

RE: “Virtual hosting” with port removed?

2015-02-01 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
From: Zala Pierre GOUPIL [mailto:goupilpie...@gmail.com] Subject: Re: “Virtual hosting” with port removed? If you use Tomcat alone (without Apache or any other web servers), you'll have to find a way to have it listen on the port 80 (there a some of them available on the web). Better than