Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-20 Thread André Warnier
Actually, I was thinking more of disabling the AccessLog in httpd, to see how much impact that had. (That's also less additional tests to run ;-)) Christopher Schultz wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 5/19/2009 2:28 PM, André Warnier wrote: Christopher Schultz w

Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 André, On 5/19/2009 2:28 PM, André Warnier wrote: > Christopher Schultz wrote: > ... > Thanks for the work. At least it may put to rest some gross > misconceptions. > > Now just a question : in the httpd tests, did you have an AccessLog > enabled ?

Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gregor, On 5/19/2009 12:59 PM, Gregor Schneider wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled: > > In your previous tests it looked like that Apache is "outperforming" > (ok, not really) Coyote w APR when the files grew bigger. I disagree with that conclusion. My inte

Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-19 Thread André Warnier
Christopher Schultz wrote: ... Thanks for the work. At least it may put to rest some gross misconceptions. Now just a question : in the httpd tests, did you have an AccessLog enabled ? I would imagine you did not have an AccessLogValve enabled in Tomcat, and I wonder if it makes any practical

RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-19 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Caldarale, Charles R > Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some > results] > > > In your last results I can't see that pattern - actually, I don't see > > /any/ pattern... > > Quantum mechanics? More seriously, we may

RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-19 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:rc4...@googlemail.com] > Subject: Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some > results] > > In your last results I can't see that pattern - actually, I don't see > /any/ pattern... Quantum mechanics? - Chuck TH

Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-19 Thread Gregor Schneider
I'm a bit puzzled: In your previous tests it looked like that Apache is "outperforming" (ok, not really) Coyote w APR when the files grew bigger. In your last results I can't see that pattern - actually, I don't see /any/ pattern... Any idea how come? Cheers Gregor -- just because your parano

Re: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [some results]

2009-05-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, So, I have some data from last night. It's about what you'd expect, except that the NIO+sendfile connector test failed most of the time: the client got something like "apr_connect: Connection reset by peer" when it tried to connect to the server.