Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Nagulapalli, Srinivas
I am trying to create second Tomcat instance on same machine. Installed Tomcat into separate folder say c:\tomcat2 and changed the conf/server.xml port numbers to different values. Basically I bumped the Server port from 8005 to 8006, connector port to 8081 from 8080 and redirectPort to 8444

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Please don't hijack threads. Mark Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote: I am trying to create second Tomcat instance on same machine. Installed Tomcat into separate folder say c:\tomcat2 and changed the conf/server.xml port numbers to different values. Basically I bumped the Server port from 8005 to

RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Nagulapalli, Srinivas
This is my first post after joining the list yesterday. Please clue me in as to what the error is. Best Srini -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Please don't hijack threads. Mark This electronic message transmission contains information from the Company

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread David kerber
It looks like you may have missed the shutdown port. Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote: I am trying to create second Tomcat instance on same machine. Installed Tomcat into separate folder say c:\tomcat2 and changed the conf/server.xml port numbers to different values. Basically I bumped the Server

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread David kerber
Mark Thomas wrote: Please don't hijack threads. Mark I don't see a thread hijack here; it came through as a new post on my installation of Thunderbird. D Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote: I am trying to create second Tomcat instance on same machine. Installed Tomcat into separate folder

RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Mike Baranski
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thread+hijacking -Original Message- From: Nagulapalli, Srinivas [mailto:srinivas.nagulapa...@starwoodvo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:30 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Mark Thomas
David kerber wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: Please don't hijack threads. Mark I don't see a thread hijack here; it came through as a new post on my installation of Thunderbird. Look at the headers. Specifically: In-Reply-To: 4ab2421c.1070...@kippdata.de Mark

RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Nagulapalli, Srinivas
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Look at the headers. Specifically: In-Reply-To: 4ab2421c.1070...@kippdata.de Please - how to see that in MS outlook, and what to do to prevent it? I used MS Outlook to post, had specifically new subject line, not a word from any other post. No

RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Nagulapalli, Srinivas
From: David kerber [mailto:dcker...@verizon.net] It looks like you may have missed the shutdown port. Thanks David. I changed this line from server.xml where initially port was 8005 and I bumped it to 8006. I hope I am looking at the right thing.

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Ken Bowen
On Sep 17, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote: From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Look at the headers. Specifically: In-Reply-To: 4ab2421c.1070...@kippdata.de Please - how to see that in MS outlook, and what to do to prevent it? I used MS Outlook to post, had

RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Nagulapalli, Srinivas
From: Ken Bowen [mailto:kbo...@als.com] It sounds like to took an existing message your received, changed the subject line, and sent it. That re-use of an existing message is hijacking. When you start a new subject, you must start a fresh email to users@tomcat.apache.org Re-use was

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Mark Thomas
Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote: From: Ken Bowen [mailto:kbo...@als.com] It sounds like to took an existing message your received, changed the subject line, and sent it. That re-use of an existing message is hijacking. When you start a new subject, you must start a fresh email to

RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Nagulapalli, Srinivas
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] http://markmail.org/message/rz3rii2w4bdtines http://www.google.co.uk/#q=How+to+view+email+headers Thanks for the links. Beats me why changing subject is linked to original mail, when user intent is so clear! Clicking Reply is to same target, and

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread lists
before yo go lambasting about the inner workings of email, read the RFC. Now we've all made the mistake of changing subject lines. So can we please move on now Thanx Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Michael Ludwig
li...@up-south.com schrieb: before yo go lambasting about the inner workings of email, read the RFC. Now we've all made the mistake of changing subject lines. So can we please move on now Thanx Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile Incidentally, *your* mailer doesn't set the In-Reply-To header;

Re: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Pid
On 17/09/2009 17:39, Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote: From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] http://markmail.org/message/rz3rii2w4bdtines http://www.google.co.uk/#q=How+to+view+email+headers Thanks for the links. Beats me why changing subject is linked to original mail, when user intent

RE: Configuring second tomcat instance on same box

2009-09-17 Thread Nagulapalli, Srinivas
From: Pid [mailto:p...@pidster.com] Perhaps you weren't aware that some mail readers track additional headers in the email, (as previously mentioned), to determine which replies refer to which other emails in the thread. It is a tree structure so one needs to monitor the branching to see