Hi Chris,
thank you so much for answer,
What about your Tomcat configuration:
Server port=8005 shutdown=SHUTDOWN
Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener
SSLEngine=on/
Service name=Catalina
Connector
maxPostSize=5242880
On 15 Oct 2012, at 07:42, Andrey Timofeyev andrey.timofe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
thank you so much for answer,
What about your Tomcat configuration:
Server port=8005 shutdown=SHUTDOWN
Listener className=org.apache.catalina.core.AprLifecycleListener
SSLEngine=on/
You have no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrey,
On 10/12/12 11:30 AM, Andrey Timofeyev wrote:
Hi, everybody,
There is followen problem with tomcat 7.0.29 (With tomcat 6.0.18
there is no such problem):
Any other services on the same machine lost connections with
remote services,
) {
System.err.println(Exception in doGet: +e.toString());
} finally {
servedThreads--;
}
}
}
-Original Message-
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
Sent: den 13 januari 2010 18:46
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: NIO-connector problems (excessive
Hi!
We've been using Tomcat on Linux for a very long time (and the good old
JServe before it), and we recently started testing the NIO-connector instead
of the old blocking one. We are currently running the latest Tomcat v6.0.20.
We have a pretty large website with quite a lot of traffic, and
yes, the issue is known. However, we have not been able to create a use
case for it, since I've never been able to reproduce it.
One of the work arounds would be to close the selector, but that is a
royal pain, since you'd then have to reregister all keys and you'd end
up in a synchronization
[mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
Sent: den 13 januari 2010 16:13
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: NIO-connector problems (excessive CPU-usage)
yes, the issue is known. However, we have not been able to create a use
case for it, since I've never been able to reproduce it.
One of the work arounds
Subject: Re: NIO-connector problems (excessive CPU-usage)
yes, the issue is known. However, we have not been able to create a use
case for it, since I've never been able to reproduce it.
One of the work arounds would be to close the selector, but that is a
royal pain, since you'd then have
Hi,
I am trying to run Tomcat 5.5.20 behind Win32 Apache HTTPD 2.2.4 with
SSL (downloaded from apachelounge.com) using the AJP connector.
I have a virtual host configured on both Tomcat and Apache HTTPD.
Everything works fine if I configure my Apache HTTPD virtual host to run
Not speaking of tomcat, as far as i know https and virtual hosting do
not mix very well unless the same certificate is used for all hosts.
En l'instant précis du 02/05/07 15:53, Bill Bailey s'exprimait en ces
termes:
Hi,
I am trying to run Tomcat 5.5.20 behind Win32 Apache HTTPD 2.2.4 with
On 2/5/07, Bill Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To start with --
Apache Virtual Host Configuration Fragment
NameVirtualHost xxx.xx.xx.x:443
NameVirtualHosting and SSL don't go together -- yank that
VirtualHost xxx.xx.xx.x:443
Put the real IP that belongs to the SSL cert there
Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 11:11 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: AJP Connector - Problems Proxying HTTPS Connections
On 2/5/07, Bill Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To start with --
Apache Virtual Host Configuration Fragment
NameVirtualHost
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bill,
Bill Bailey wrote:
!-- Define a non-SSL HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8080 --
This one is irrelevant to this discussion, right? Your AJP connector is
the only one not working.
!-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --
It should be OK, it's not named based virtual hosts in his case.
You should be posting this to the httpd user list, since you are using
mod_proxy_* and not mod_jk. You might get help here too, but it's more a
question concerning an httpd standard module.
From general experience: the answer
On 2/5/07, Bill Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ServerName www.resourcepoint.org:80
ServerAlias www.resourcepoint.org:80
again, the port # doesn't belong there, and there's no sense
to defining a ServerAlias the same as the ServerName
# Note that this approach with single
-Original Message-
From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 1:26 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: AJP Connector - Problems Proxying HTTPS Connections
On 2/5/07, Bill Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ServerName www.resourcepoint.org:80
On 2/5/07, Bill Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the context (which I don't want visible to the end users) has
'escaped' into the browser world. I found that this was not a problem if
I made my application appear in the ROOT context for the server, but
didn't want to remove the standard ROOT
configuration, I'd still
be interested.
Thanks again.
Bill Bailey
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:25 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: AJP Connector - Problems Proxying HTTPS Connections
From: Bill Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL
: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:33 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: AJP Connector - Problems Proxying HTTPS Connections
On 2/5/07, Bill Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So the context (which I don't want visible to the end users) has
'escaped' into the browser world. I found
Rainer Jung schrieb:
Hi Martin,
these lines only mean, that mod_jk is checking whether it should forward
the request or not, but it doesn't find a match (=JkMount), so it
decides to let other apache modules handle the request. This part of
request processing is normal, even if there is no
Martin Hochreiter wrote:
I'll see, I solved it with another way:
I simply kicked out mod_jk and use mod_proxy.
The performance is a significant better.
Great. You can at least say that you are
the first one!
Please give us some benchmark results.
Cheers,
Mladen.
: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: jk connector problems
Hi Martin,
these lines only mean, that mod_jk is checking whether it should forward
the request or not, but it doesn't find a match (=JkMount), so it
decides to let other apache modules handle the request. This part
: jk connector problems
Hi Martin,
these lines only mean, that mod_jk is checking whether it should forward
the request or not, but it doesn't find a match (=JkMount), so it
decides to let other apache modules handle the request. This part of
request processing is normal, even
Hi!
I have some problems with Tomcat JK Connector and Apache Virtual hosts.
Apache should only give requests of one virtual host to the jk
connector, but
it handles all requests over to the jk connector, no matter what host.
Actually the log files of jkerror.log are very big - and getting
Hi,
Martin Hochreiter schrieb:
Hi!
I have some problems with Tomcat JK Connector and Apache Virtual hosts.
Apache should only give requests of one virtual host to the jk
connector, but
it handles all requests over to the jk connector, no matter what host.
I didn't try your config, but
Rainer Jung schrieb:
Hi,
Martin Hochreiter schrieb:
Hi!
I have some problems with Tomcat JK Connector and Apache Virtual hosts.
Apache should only give requests of one virtual host to the jk
connector, but
it handles all requests over to the jk connector, no matter what host.
I
Hi Martin,
these lines only mean, that mod_jk is checking whether it should forward
the request or not, but it doesn't find a match (=JkMount), so it
decides to let other apache modules handle the request. This part of
request processing is normal, even if there is no JkMount.
Regards,
Rainer
I am unable to get the tomcat connectors to work after spending hours
reading docs and scouring google in search of answers.
I have seen the problem I am having posted all over the web but there
are no solutions to it that I have seen.
Here is the summary of the problem:
: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am unable to get the tomcat connectors to work after spending hours
reading docs and scouring google in search of answers.
I have seen the problem I am having posted all over the web
: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am unable to get the tomcat connectors to work after spending hours
reading docs and scouring google in search of answers.
I have seen the problem I am having posted all over the web but there
are no solutions
. Goodell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am unable to get the tomcat connectors to work after spending hours
reading docs and scouring google in search of answers.
I have seen the problem I am having posted
the mod_jk.nlm and nsapi.nlm
win32/i386 Contains the mod_jk.dll for Windows as well as other useful
binaries.
-Original Message-
From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connector Problems -
Past thread have
, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am unable to get the tomcat connectors to work after spending hours
reading docs and scouring google in search of answers.
I have seen the problem I am having posted all over the web but there
are no solutions to it that I have
the mod_jk load library be a dll rather
than so?
I believe you have referenced the incorrect mod_jk.
-Original Message-
From: M. Goodell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am unable to get the tomcat
the mod_jk.nlm and nsapi.nlm
win32/i386 Contains the mod_jk.dll for Windows as well as other useful
binaries.
-Original Message-
From: David Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:39 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Connector Problems -
Past thread
Message-
From: M. Goodell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am unable to get the tomcat connectors to work after spending hours
reading docs and scouring google in search of answers.
I have seen the problem I am
you have windows, shouldn't the mod_jk load library be a dll rather
than so?
I believe you have referenced the incorrect mod_jk.
-Original Message-
From: M. Goodell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am
mod_jk.
-Original Message-
From: M. Goodell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2006 3:15 PM
To: Tomcat Questions
Subject: Connector Problems -
I am unable to get the tomcat connectors to work after spending hours
reading docs and scouring google in search of answers
I just finally moved over to mod_jk from mod_jk2.
Since this is a development environment on
Windows/2000 Professional, I didn't have the pressure
to move.
Anyway, here's my environment:
Windows/2000 Professional
Apache 2.054 (will upgrade one of these days)
Tomcat 5.5.17
JDK 1.5.0_06-b05
://www.nabble.com/Connector-Problems---tf2074658.html#a5714885
Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
In looking at your config, I see that the word type is spelled typw Was
this copied directly from your actual config file?
worker.worker1.typw=ajp13
Just wondering . . .
Mark Eggers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just finally moved over to mod_jk from mod_jk2.
Since this is a development
/mod_jk.log
JkLogLevel debug
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Connector-Problems---tf2074658.html#a5714885
Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.
-
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
42 matches
Mail list logo
