On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 12:46 PM Carsten Klein wrote:
>
>
> On 01/06/2021 10:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
> > I don't know if you can. I suspect not. By all means see if you can. I'm
> > mildly curious to find out the answer. Whether you can or not, you don't
> > need to.
>
> I found nothing to re-tri
On 01/06/2021 10:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
I don't know if you can. I suspect not. By all means see if you can. I'm
mildly curious to find out the answer. Whether you can or not, you don't
need to.
I found nothing to re-trigger the Travis CI build so far. However, now
the CI test is 'success
On 01/06/2021 08:39, Carsten Klein wrote:
Mark,
On 01/06/2021 09:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
We have been seeing that a lot lately. As far as I can tell, it is an
issue with Travis CI.
Can you use the PR anyway?
Yes. We don't have a strict CI must pass rule. Whether or not a PR is
applied a de
Mark,
On 01/06/2021 09:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
We have been seeing that a lot lately. As far as I can tell, it is an
issue with Travis CI.
Can you use the PR anyway? Can/must I re-trigger the Travis build?
Carsten
-
To unsub
On 29/05/2021 13:28, Carsten Klein wrote:
Mark,
On 27/05/2021 18:56, Carsten Klein wrote:
Concerning removal of class UserDatabaseRealm.UserDatabasePrincipal:
I will provide a PR and file a corresponding issue in Bugzilla soon.
My PR and Bugzilla issue are present. However, Travis CI build
Chris,
On 28/05/2021 23:16, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Yeah, about that...
https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/411
IMO this is a Bad Thing for Java. If someone was looking for a reason to
abandon the whole Java ecosystem, this would be it. Well, we had a good
run.
Now we can all run node.js
Mark,
On 27/05/2021 18:56, Carsten Klein wrote:
Concerning removal of class UserDatabaseRealm.UserDatabasePrincipal:
I will provide a PR and file a corresponding issue in Bugzilla soon.
My PR and Bugzilla issue are present. However, Travis CI build failed
on arm64 architecture for the PR w
Mark,
On 5/28/21 04:13, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 28/05/2021 07:22, Carsten Klein wrote:
Chris, Mark,
On 27/05/2021 22:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
After re-reading this, you mentioned reflection while asking how much
we trust in Collections.unmodifiableMap(). I didn't get that right, my
b
Carsten,
On 5/28/21 01:48, Carsten Klein wrote:
Chris, Mark,
On 27/05/2021 22:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
What's the primary use-case for these kinds of attributes?
This has been described in detail here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-users/202104.mbox/ajax/%3Cb9a2a
On 28/05/2021 07:22, Carsten Klein wrote:
Chris, Mark,
On 27/05/2021 22:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
After re-reading this, you mentioned reflection while asking how much we
trust in Collections.unmodifiableMap(). I didn't get that right, my bad.
However, I thought of reflection in orde
Chris, Mark,
On 27/05/2021 22:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
After re-reading this, you mentioned reflection while asking how much we
trust in Collections.unmodifiableMap(). I didn't get that right, my bad.
However, I thought of reflection in order to implement a deep copy
mechanism. May
Chris, Mark,
On 27/05/2021 22:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
What's the primary use-case for these kinds of attributes?
This has been described in detail here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-users/202104.mbox/ajax/%3Cb9a2a913-f00f-f5bf-ca05-8ea4f8663ca9%40datagis.com%3E
Mark,
On 5/27/21 12:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/05/2021 15:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 5/27/21 04:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/05/2021 07:32, Carsten Klein wrote:
On 26/05/2021 19:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given that the attributes may well be security related, you would
need to
You read my mind. I always wanted to report this, but never find time.
Implemented this for our realm and principal years ago:
http://tomcatspnegoad.sourceforge.net/apidocs/net/sf/michaelo/tomcat/realm/ActiveDirectoryPrincipal.html#getAdditionalAttributes--
The entire principal should be immutab
Mark,
On 27/05/2021 18:19, Mark Thomas wrote:
I will note that it isn't uncommon to have to log out and back in again
to pick up newly allocated groups/roles in other environments.
Yes, you are right. Didn't see it that way so far. We're talking about
live updates for a session during its li
On 27/05/2021 15:04, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 5/27/21 04:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/05/2021 07:32, Carsten Klein wrote:
On 26/05/2021 19:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given that the attributes may well be security related, you would
need to make sure neither the Map nor any of the keys
On 27/05/2021 12:49, Carsten Klein wrote:
On 27/05/2021 10:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
As far as I can tell, removing UserDatabasePrincipal, relying on
GenericPrincipal and User remaining an internal object not exposed via
the Servlet API would achieve the same result with less code.
At this po
Mark,
On 5/27/21 04:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/05/2021 07:32, Carsten Klein wrote:
On 26/05/2021 19:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given that the attributes may well be security related, you would
need to make sure neither the Map nor any of the keys/values could be
modified. Protecting the Map is
On 27/05/2021 10:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
As far as I can tell, removing UserDatabasePrincipal, relying on
GenericPrincipal and User remaining an internal object not exposed via
the Servlet API would achieve the same result with less code.
At this point I am looking for a reason not to remove
On 27/05/2021 07:32, Carsten Klein wrote:
On 26/05/2021 19:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given that the attributes may well be security related, you would need
to make sure neither the Map nor any of the keys/values could be
modified. Protecting the Map is easy. Protecting the keys/values is a
littl
Hi Mark,
thanks for sharing your ideas :)
On 26/05/2021 19:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
Given that the attributes may well be security related, you would need
to make sure neither the Map nor any of the keys/values could be
modified. Protecting the Map is easy. Protecting the keys/values is a
litt
On 26/05/2021 18:56, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 26/05/2021 12:00, Carsten Klein wrote:
Why does UserDatabaseRealm pass a userPrincipal of type
UserDatabasePrincipal? Can't we just drop that and do it like
JNDIRealm or DataSourceRealm?
I don't see any obvious reason. I'll do some digging in the
On 26/05/2021 12:00, Carsten Klein wrote:
1. How to access the Principal's new attributes
Simplest is to provide a getter method, that actually returns the map
(optionally with a read-only parameter):
Given that the attributes may well be security related, you would need
to make sure neit
Hi there,
as already discussed here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-users/202104.mbox/ajax/%3Cb9a2a913-f00f-f5bf-ca05-8ea4f8663ca9%40datagis.com%3E
I'm implementing an enhancement for querying configurable extra user
attributes through some of the Realm classes from the "user
24 matches
Mail list logo
