List
Cc: Voodoo nmulcahy gmail ; Rob Kowald
Subject: RE: [EXT]Re: [EXT]Re: [EXT]Re: Tomcat 10 skipping state transfer. No
members active in cluster group
Your suggestion worked Chuck, Thank you!
I now see this in cat log..
23-Apr-2024 08:30:10.969 INFO [Catalina-utility-1
]Re: [EXT]Re: Tomcat 10 skipping state transfer. No
members active in cluster group
> On Apr 22, 2024, at 18:48, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> So you mean we use the VM's IP as the address value below
> Instead or using the value of auto ?
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2024, at 18:48, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> So you mean we use the VM's IP as the address value below
> Instead or using the value of auto ?
>
> address="auto"
>port="4001"
> autoBind="100"
>
Subject: [EXT]Re: [EXT]Re: Tomcat 10 skipping state transfer. No members active
in cluster group
> On Apr 22, 2024, at 16:33, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> Tomcats are two different VMs
Which explains why they can’t talk to each other over 127.0.0.1.
> What do you mean each containers
> On Apr 22, 2024, at 16:33, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> Tomcats are two different VMs
Which explains why they can’t talk to each other over 127.0.0.1.
> What do you mean each containers published IP
Each VM or container will have an assigned, individual IP address so it can
communicate with
Rick Noel
Systems Programmer | Westwood One
rn...@westwoodone.com
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Caldarale
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2024 4:41 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: [EXT]Re: Tomcat 10 skipping state transfer. No members active in
cluster group
> On Apr 22, 2024, at 09
> On Apr 22, 2024, at 09:54, Rick Noel wrote:
>
> Could someone please explain why I am getting the error
>
> skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group
Need a bit more information.
> On one sever the
Would you please take me off of this list
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 9:01 AM Rick Noel
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could someone please explain why I am getting the error
>
> skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group
>
> On one sever the reciever is
Hello,
Could someone please explain why I am getting the error
skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group
On one sever the reciever is bound to 127.0.0.1:4002
And on the other server the receiver is bound to 127.0.0.1:4001
But both
To use *DeltaManager* with unicast (static membership), the Tomcat 8.5
documentation (https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/cluster.html)
states that the channelStartOptions should be equal to *3*. In my original
example, I am using the same value with the *StaticMembershipInterceptor*.
Hi,
Can you please share what's going on in this post
Thanks and Regards,
Deepak Lalchandani
On Wed, 6 Dec 2023, 10:59 pm Manak Bisht, wrote:
> Hi Mark
> Could you please clarify this?
>
> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM Manak Bisht wrote:
>
> > The channelStartOptions setting is from
Hi Mark
Could you please clarify this?
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 3:40 PM Manak Bisht wrote:
> The channelStartOptions setting is from the documentation
> https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-8.5-doc/config/cluster.html
> *"To start a channel without multicasting, you would want to use the value
>
> Also, the documentation also says that the *distributable *tag is
> deprecated and ignored since Tomcat 8 (
> https://tomcat.apache.org/migration-9)
> *"The distributable attribute has been deprecated in 8.0 and specified
> value is ignored."*
>
*Note for future readers: *In the previous email,
Thanks a lot for the informative reply, Chris. I really appreciate it.
> If you have a good reason to disable stickness, I'd love to hear the
> reasoning.
>
While both the DeltaManager and BackupManager solve my problem of
autoscaling/failover without any re-logins required, I have noticed a lot
> I’m not a clustering expert, but perhaps the address value needs to be an
> IP address accessible to the other machine in the cluster. The above
> 127.0.0.1 (localhost) would appear to limit each receiver to the machine
> it’s running on.
>
Yes, that was it. Replacing the address with "0.0.0.0"
clustering manager at localhost#
org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager.getAllClusterSessions Manager
[localhost#]: skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
Please find the cluster settings (inside the * *tag) below. I have
also added the * *tag to the *web.xml *files
Manak,
On 12/1/23 03:27, Manak Bisht wrote:
Hi, I am trying to implement non-sticky session replication using Delta
Manager with static membership. The nodes are across two different
machines.
This isn't really relevant to your issue, but I would *always* recommend
enabling stickiness. Why?
catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager.startInternal Starting
>> clustering manager at localhost#
>> org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager.getAllClusterSessions Manager
>> [localhost#]: skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
>>
>> Please find the
; clustering manager at localhost#
> org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager.getAllClusterSessions Manager
> [localhost#]: skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
>
> Please find the cluster settings (inside the * *tag) below. I have
> also added the * *tag to the *web.xml *files.
&
t;
>> > org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager.startInternal Register
>> manager
>> > localhost# to cluster element Engine with name Catalina
>> > org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager.startInternal Starting
>> > clustering manager at localhost#
>> > org.apa
org.apache.catalina.ha.session.DeltaManager.getAllClusterSessions Manager
> > [localhost#]: skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster
> group.
> >
> > Please find the cluster settings (inside the * *tag) below. I
> have
> > also added the * *tag to the *w
#]: skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster group.
Please find the cluster settings (inside the * *tag) below. I have
also added the * *tag to the *web.xml *files.
*Node_1*
Why channelStartOptions=3 ? I think this shoudl use the default.
Minor point but I try
active in cluster group.
Please find the cluster settings (inside the * *tag) below. I have
also added the * *tag to the *web.xml *files.
*Node_1
Hello all,
I am having problems in getting clustering to work in a windows server
2008 environment using tomcat 6.0.20 java 1.5
I get the No members active in cluster group message on both tomcats.
The engine element on the first tomcat is:
Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute
On 15.07.2010 10:08, Andrew Bruno wrote:
Hello all,
I am having problems in getting clustering to work in a windows server
2008 environment using tomcat 6.0.20 java 1.5
I get the No members active in cluster group message on both tomcats.
The engine element on the first tomcat is:
Engine
clustering to work in a windows server
2008 environment using tomcat 6.0.20 java 1.5
I get the No members active in cluster group message on both tomcats.
The engine element on the first tomcat is:
Engine name=Catalina defaultHost=localhost jvmRoute=1
Cluster className
List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thu, July 15, 2010 5:39:28 PM
Subject: Re: No members active in cluster group
Are both instances running on the same host
Yes, both running on same host. I will upgrade, and see how it goes.
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j
INFO: Manager [/jspSession]: skipping state transfer. No members
active in cluster group.
Oct 25, 2006 11:21:52 AM
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol start
INFO: Starting Coyote HTTP/1.1 on http-8080
Oct 25, 2006 11:21:52 AM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
INFO: JK: ajp13
suggestion?
HoTszKin
- Original Message -
From: Peter Rossbach [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat Cluster problem. skipping state transfer. No members
active in cluster group
I think you
: Tomcat Cluster problem. skipping state transfer. No
members active in cluster group
I think you have a network routing problem.
Read the cluster help: http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/cluster.html
Regards
Peter
Am 25.10.2006 um 06:20 schrieb hotszkin:
I am trying to setup a tomcat cluster
. skipping state transfer. No members
active in cluster group
Test without mcastBindAddress again!
Peter
Am 26.10.2006 um 09:54 schrieb hotszkin:
Thanks for your reply.
I have added the multcast route to the routing table with the
following command route add -host 228.0.0.4 dev -eth1
problem, inside the log, there is a line said, INFO:
Manager [/jspSession]: skipping state transfer. No members active in cluster
group. I have search the internet, people say it should be the problem of
multicast. So I use the javagroup's McastReceiverTest/McastSenderTest to
test multicast
32 matches
Mail list logo
