Typing this from my phone so sorry for top posting no other option.
You might also check your garbage collection which can introduce some
pauses in some cases. Just a thought ...
On May 11, 2012 7:26 AM, "Jon Drukman" wrote:
> Caldarale, Charles R unisys.com> writes:
>
> > Using JConsole or Vis
Caldarale, Charles R unisys.com> writes:
> Using JConsole or VisualVM would be a good start.
OK, I'll take a look at those.
> > There's only one app running on this tomcat, if that makes
> > any difference.
>
> Does it connect to a database (or any other external resource)?
> If so, are you
> From: Jon Drukman [mailto:j...@cluttered.com]
> Subject: Re: Connection timeout
> Is there any way to find out how many threads are being used
> at a given moment?
Using JConsole or VisualVM would be a good start. Either of those will let you
see what's going on with thr
Pid pidster.com> writes:
> The basic point we're making is that you are twiddling the wrong knobs.
OK, good to know.
> If you want to handle more connections, increase the size of the thread
> pool that handles requests, don't increase the size of the queue of
> requests waiting to be handled.
On 10/05/2012 21:40, Jon Drukman wrote:
> Caldarale, Charles R unisys.com> writes:
>
>> You keep contradicting yourself: is it a massive box, or can it
>> only support a miniscule number of threads?
>> Pick one.
>
> Where did I say it could only support a miniscule number of threads?
> I'm sor
Caldarale, Charles R unisys.com> writes:
> You keep contradicting yourself: is it a massive box, or can it
> only support a miniscule number of threads?
> Pick one.
Where did I say it could only support a miniscule number of threads?
I'm sorry if I accidentally gave that impression.
It's a ma
> From: Jon Drukman [mailto:j...@cluttered.com]
> Subject: Re: Connection timeout
> > Do you really want to queue up requests, rather than just accepting them
> > and assigning them to threads?
> Well, I assume at some point I may run out of threads.
> > * 400 is a g
Pid pidster.com> writes:
> Not really. Did you change the connectionTimeout downwards from the
> default 60 secs to 3 secs?
Yes. Although the original version of the file was 20 seconds.
The clients (which I wrote) all have a 3 second connect timeout, so it seemed
to make sense to make the se
On 10/05/2012 20:06, Jon Drukman wrote:
> I have a commercial app running Tomcat 6. I don't really know anything
> about Tomcat, so I need some help with performance tuning.
>
> What happens is that a small percentage of connections from our client
> machines just timeout on the connect. I assum
Have you tried *removeAbandonedTimeout* in connection pool settings ? this
will help to get the connectionb closed if your DB connection waiting more
than a specific amount of time.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 4:02 AM, André Warnier wrote:
> vichi wrote:
>
>> i want to close a connection if i don't
> From: vichi [mailto:vichi...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Connection Timeout
>
> does closing a connection will free http thread?
No; the thread does not return to the pool until the webapp logic is completed.
You'll need to have the webapp monitor itself.
- Chuck
THIS
thanks Martin for valuable help. In my project i m using embedded tomcat
server 5.5.23 and with http connector . my project is a middle ware
product. so using my product a customer can create his application. since my
product use embedded tomcat server so if a user send any request it comes
to
Here are some timeout settings
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/timeouts.html.
Can I ask, what brings you to such requirements. I consider it for
little bit unusual. So what is your case originally? If you tell us,
maybe another solution could be take.
Martin
2009/11/12 vich
vichi wrote:
i want to close a connection if i don't get response back in specific time
(let say in 30 sec) . is there any setting in tomcat for this purpose.
please need an urgent help
It might help if you explained what connection, to what.
And as long as you are doing that, some information
14 matches
Mail list logo
