-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 1/27/12 4:16 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
To whom it may concern,
On 1/27/12 6:35 PM, bxqdev wrote:
10'000 req/sec 300Kb/response
That should be just under 3GiB (gigabyte) per second response, not 3Gb
(gigabit).
actually when i measured it was less than 1Gb/sec
Is that in gigabits or
On 27 Jan 2012, at 23:53, bxqdev bxq...@themailbay.com wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16
On 1/28/2012 6:33 AM, Terence M. Bandoian wrote:
How much is a lot?
10'000/sec
How many Tomcats are you running?
1
How much RAM/CPU per server etc?
8GB/Xeon
How big is the average response?
300Kb
How many NICs do you have? Have fast are they?
one. as i said above, the
On 1/28/2012 12:09 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 27 Jan 2012, at 23:53, bxqdevbxq...@themailbay.com wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012
On 27/01/2012 23:16, bxqdev wrote:
2. async servlet api is not much usefull for servers, with nio
connectors (tomcat-7). at least you can't image the case.
I don't say that. In fact, I said exactly the opposite.
well, then what's the case to use both of this technologies? can you
make up a
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
snip
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combinations of
connector+servlet api
1. bio connector + async servlet
2. nio connector + sync servlet
3. nio
well, let's separate the wheat from the chaff and arrogance:
1. nio connector is useful when one needs to handle a lot of
client connections, keep-alive ones, for example.
2. async servlet is useful when one app thread can fulfill many responses.
3. communication between connector and async
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
snip
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combinations of
connector+servlet api
1. bio connector + async servlet
2. nio
On 28 Jan 2012, at 13:34, bxqdev bxq...@themailbay.com wrote:
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
snip
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3 cases when to use 3 combinations of
On 1/28/2012 6:14 PM, Pid * wrote:
On 28 Jan 2012, at 13:34, bxqdevbxq...@themailbay.com wrote:
On 1/28/2012 5:01 PM, Pid wrote:
On 28/01/2012 09:07, bxqdev wrote:
snip
I see. Did you identify where the bottleneck was?
well, we are getting too far from the subject.
can you make up 3
Hi.
Your original question was
quote
1. What are the premises to use either apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
2. Do i get any advantages if i use Sync Servlet Api with Http11NioProtocol connector or
do i have to use Async Servlet
andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
try to be positive, try to look on the situation from
another point of view, the one which is not depressive.
i hope my question answer summary upgraded your level of tomcat understanding.
and that's a good thing, because you
On 28/01/2012 19:07, bxqdev wrote:
andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
try to be positive, try to look on the situation from
another point of view, the one which is not depressive.
i hope my question answer summary upgraded your level of tomcat
understanding.
and
Considering your previous posts, I wasn't really expecting you to take this lying down.
You haven't disappointed me. The world is full of wonders.
Un paquet de m. dans un bas de soie.
:-)
bxqdev wrote:
andre, i'm sorry if i hurt your feelings and trust in humanity,
try to be positive, try to
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
Eh? Is that what you really mean?
2. Do i get any advantages if i use Sync Servlet Api with
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
There is no such protocol as apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol so
if you try using it, that
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
There is no such protocol as
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
Eh? Is that what you really mean?
i mean what are the reasons to
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
There is no such
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol connectors?
Eh? Is that what you
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol
On 27/01/2012 21:31, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
On 1/28/2012 1:53 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:31, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:14 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:03, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:29 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
both connector and servlet code are async.
is there a case when i would need such a combination?
Where someone might need
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol or
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
both connector and servlet code are async.
is there a case when i would need such a
On 27/01/2012 22:41, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
both connector and servlet code are async.
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the premises to use either
On 1/28/2012 2:49 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:41, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:28 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:22, bxqdev wrote:
ok, so what about this case:
http nio connector + async servlet
i would say that in this variant there're 2 points of asynchronism -
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello, Developers!
1. What are the
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 14:53, bxqdev wrote:
Hello,
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/27/2012 8:27 PM, Pid wrote:
On
On 1/28/2012 3:41 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 23:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 3:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 22:51, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 2:39 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:35, bxqdev wrote:
On 1/28/2012 1:16 AM, Pid wrote:
On 27/01/2012 21:06, bxqdev wrote:
On
How much is a lot?
10'000/sec
How many Tomcats are you running?
1
How much RAM/CPU per server etc?
8GB/Xeon
How big is the average response?
300Kb
How many NICs do you have? Have fast are they?
-Terence Bandoian
36 matches
Mail list logo
