What about multiple JREs or JDKs on your system? Unlike Microsoft products,
you can actually have multiple versions of Java on your system coexisting
peacefully. Try installing the public beta of IE 7--and you are now running
beta software in the core of your OS (assuming of course you have a
Some of us run many JVM's on the same machine. And for reasons which drive us
insane, java 1.1.X tends to be the first java in the PATH.
-Tim
Stefan Wachter wrote:
Hi all,
wouldn't it be nice if Tomcat does not need the JAVA_HOME or JRE_HOME
environment variable? After installation of the
What about multiple JREs or JDKs on your system? Unlike Microsoft products,
you can actually have multiple versions of Java on your system coexisting
peacefully.
Unfortunately, this is not really true... because the first entry in path
is the really one active. I had orrible experience
Hi Tim (et al.),
ok, I understand the necessity for using different JDKs. I thought that
adjusting the JAVA_HOME environment variable for certain situations
might be the same effort as adjusting the PATH environment variable.
Maybe an option would be to use the JAVA_HOME/JRE_HOME variables
The question is: Where will Tomcat be running?
If Tomcat is only running on one server, then only that server needs to be
set up. If you are going to be running Tomcat on each machine, then
modify/create the start up scripts to set the JAVA_HOME/JAVA_JRE paths in
the script. (Easily done on
Did I reply to the wrong thread? Or did I reply to a high-jacked thread? I
am sorry.
On 5/10/06, Marc Farrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The question is: Where will Tomcat be running?
If Tomcat is only running on one server, then only that server needs to be
set up. If you are going to be
