> -Original Message-
> From: eurotrans-Verlag [mailto:verlag.preis...@t-online.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 7:14 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
>
> Hi,
>
>
> This seems to only app
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 5:35 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
>
>
>
> Allow me to clear that up:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffrey Janner [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:08 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
>
> This is a known issue with the APR library,
on on Windows systems.
Therefore, the underlying issue may be a Windows one.
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Mayr [mailto:ste...@mayr-stefan.de]
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 10:16 AM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
Hello,
Am 21.08.2011 15:01, schrieb Venkata Surapaneni:
Verlag,
Both the suggestions worked and We are going to add address line to
the server.xml file.
Is the support for IP 4 dropped by plan or by accident ? If it is by plan,
isn't it early ? There are still lot of applications ru
Verlag,
Both the suggestions worked and We are going to add address line to the
server.xml file.
Is the support for IP 4 dropped by plan or by accident ? If it is by plan,
isn't it early ? There are still lot of applications running on IP 4 and it
will be while before every one is read
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Venkata Surapaneni [mailto:vsurapan...@imedx.com]
> Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 12:26 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
>
> And on top of this all the log look clean. Not
the server.xml file.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 2:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
Venkata Surapaneni wrote:
> We have a requirement to stick to 5.x version as of
0.
The below is the server.xml file.
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 2:55 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit
Venkata Surapaneni wrote:
We have a requirement to stick to 5.x version as of now. We tried using the
latest version of 5.5.x, but we encountered a issue. After installing the
tomcat and if we check in the browser as localhost, it is working fine. But if
we try accessing using IP address, then
List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit windows server 2008.
kiran surapaneni wrote:
> We are setting up Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit Windows server 2008.
Why are you doing this on a new system ? The current version of Tomcat is
7.0.20, and between Tomcat 5.5.28 (itself not the most recent version
kiran surapaneni wrote:
We are setting up Tomcat 5.5.28 on 64 bit Windows server 2008.
Why are you doing this on a new system ? The current version of Tomcat is 7.0.20, and
between Tomcat 5.5.28 (itself not the most recent version of Tomcat 5.5), there was
already Tomcat 6.0 (current version
or will not be loaded. I am wondering if http
> requests to a JSP page are blocked before the servlets are loaded.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 12:14 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 Servlet Spec 2.3 - When does Tomcat actually service
requests?
2011/2/14 Shaun Farrugia :
> I would think the same but I'm wondering that Tomcat is doing. Would it
> allow http requests to a JSP to be serviced before ALL of the servlets marked
> as
2011/2/14 Shaun Farrugia :
> I would think the same but I'm wondering that Tomcat is doing. Would it
> allow http requests to a JSP to be serviced before ALL of the servlets marked
> as load-on-startup are loaded?
>
They will be loaded, but any failure will just mark this specific
servlet as u
1:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 Servlet Spec 2.3 - When does Tomcat actually service
requests?
On 11/02/2011 22:10, Shaun Farrugia wrote:
> I know that per the Servlet Spec 2.3 that Tomcat will start up the Listeners
> first and then start up any servlets. However,
On 11/02/2011 22:10, Shaun Farrugia wrote:
> I know that per the Servlet Spec 2.3 that Tomcat will start up the Listeners
> first and then start up any servlets. However, I am unsure (the spec is
> ambigious) on when the Servlet container is supposed to start servicing
> incoming requests.
>
>
Christopher Schultz wrote:
...
Note that members of this list often have difficulty giving advice to
folks using package-managed versions of Tomcat because of the ...
latitude taken by the package administrators when it comes to the
placement of configuration files, deployed webapps, etc.
Oh i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
William,
On 4/8/2010 6:32 PM, William wrote:
> I just installed ubuntu and netbeans 6.7.1 . My web hosting use 5.5.28 I
> need to download the zip ver. of 5.5.28 for netbeans . Where do I
> download the ver for ubuntu ?
Apache does not provide OS- or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pid,
On 1/26/2010 6:54 PM, Pid wrote:
> Tomcat supplies all of the servlet & JSPs jars, you don't need to add them.
+1
In fact, it's illegal to provide them. Smith should have noticed a
warning in catalina.out (or elsewhere) that servlet-api.jar pro
On 26/01/2010 18:12, ssmith wrote:
Sorry, new to Nabble.
I am defining a servlet filter.
I tried to use the existing wars built for Tomcat 5.0.28, but they would not
deploy at all. So, yes, I rebuilt them for Tomcat 5.5.28.
You should rebuild, especially if you are compiling JSPs.
Yes, I
Sorry, new to Nabble.
I am defining a servlet filter.
I tried to use the existing wars built for Tomcat 5.0.28, but they would not
deploy at all.
So, yes, I rebuilt them for Tomcat 5.5.28.
Yes, I have a servlet-api.jar in the WEB-INF/lib/ and tomcat/common/lib
directories. Eclipse (really MyE
On 26/01/2010 14:25, ssmith wrote:
Spacing improves legibility.
I have two filters within my web.xml--one uses a sitemesh plugin and the
other uses a wikiUrlSessionIdFilter plugin---from sitemesh.jar and
jboss-seam.jar respectively. If I place the two jars in tomcat/common/lib
directory and s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sharmila,
On 1/22/2010 5:43 AM, sharmila punde wrote:
> My OS is fedora, and i have installed tomcat 5.5.28. I have web app.
> My jsp page has EL as follow- ${perosn.name}.
Did you mean ${person.name}? Could that be the problem?
> I put jsp-api.jar,
Check this FAQ - http://faq.javaranch.com/java/ElOrJstlNotWorkingAsExpected
With best regards,
Nishant Hadole
Siemens IT Solutions and Services
SIS PRO SI-I
Tel.: +91 22 2495 7816
Fax: +91 22 6660 8521
Mailto: nishant.had...@siemens.com
www.siemens.co.in
-Original Message-
From: sharmila
On 12/16/2009 11:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/12/2009 17:28, Martin B. Smith wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm getting some exceptions with a vanilla Tomcat 5.5.28 and a simple
logging valve. I'm using the following version of Java:
java version "1.5.0_22"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Editio
On 16/12/2009 17:28, Martin B. Smith wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm getting some exceptions with a vanilla Tomcat 5.5.28 and a simple
> logging valve. I'm using the following version of Java:
>
> java version "1.5.0_22"
> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_22-b03)
> Java Ho
Michael C wrote:
Andre,
From what I'm able to remember, that's amazing!
..
Waow. I can already see the long-distance credits piling up here.
I can feel the QOS increasing, the Hops decreasing along with the
Latency, and the TTL just shifted left one place.
-
Michael C wrote:
Chuck,
I fully agree about IE but the people in charge don't wanna hear it.
The fact that this is a third party tomcat install confuses me even
more than if it was normal, and definitely frustrating that the logs
could be anywhere. If we pretend I did have a normal install, are
Andre,
>From what I'm able to remember, that's amazing! Also I will check all
of those places as soon as I'm allowed back on. I'm almost certain
server.XML contains 8080.
-Mike
On Thursday, November 5, 2009, André Warnier wrote:
> Michael C wrote:
>
> Chuck,
>
> I can't get to the server at th
> From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
>
> I fully agree about IE but the people in charge don't wanna hear it.
I didn't mean for everyone, just for your testing until things are sorted.
> If we pr
e how helpful it will be given the
third party nature.
--Mike
On Thursday, November 5, 2009, Caldarale, Charles R
wrote:
>> From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
>>
>> when I go to http://:8080 I don&#x
Michael C wrote:
Chuck,
I can't get to the server at the moment but I'm an absolute noob. The
way I know it doesn't work is that when I go to http://:8080 I don't get the tomcat screen that comes up with version
5.5.28. Just page cannot be displayed. As soon as I am allowed, I'll
check the log
> From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
>
> when I go to http://:8080 I don't get the tomcat screen
> that comes up with version 5.5.28. Just page cannot be displayed.
Sounds like you're using IE as
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
Subject: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
Tomcat no longer works.
Care to tell us what that means? Log entries, error messages, anything useful?
Or do we have to call Pid to get him to use his Internet Tele
Chuck,
I can't get to the server at the moment but I'm an absolute noob. The
way I know it doesn't work is that when I go to http://:8080 I don't get the tomcat screen that comes up with version
5.5.28. Just page cannot be displayed. As soon as I am allowed, I'll
check the log files (which I hope
> From: Michael C [mailto:tomcat6d...@gmail.com]
> Subject: Tomcat 5.5.28 to 6.0.20 migration question
>
> Tomcat no longer works.
Care to tell us what that means? Log entries, error messages, anything useful?
Or do we have to call Pid to get him to use his Internet Telepathy?
- Chuck
THIS
> From: Daniel B. Thurman [mailto:d...@cdkkt.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28: Admin Tool login page problem?
>
> http://localhost:8080/admin
>
> All of my URLs in regards to Tomcat is on port 8080.
> Now I see why that proxy reference was mentioned!
Now back to your orig
On 09/23/2009 01:28 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Daniel B. Thurman [mailto:d...@cdkkt.com]
>> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28: Admin Tool login page problem?
>>
>>
>>>>>> Just wondering if this problem has been reported:
>>>>>&g
> From: Daniel B. Thurman [mailto:d...@cdkkt.com]
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 5.5.28: Admin Tool login page problem?
>
> >>>> Just wondering if this problem has been reported:
> >>>> URL: http://localhost/admin
>
> I have Apache running at port 80 and Tomc
On 09/23/2009 11:42 AM, David Smith wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> On 09/23/2009 10:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>>
Just wondering if this problem has been reported:
URL: http://localhost/admin
1) The Login.jpg image is n
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> On 09/23/2009 10:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Just wondering if this problem has been reported:
>>>
>>> URL: http://localhost/admin
>>>
>>> 1) The Login.jpg image is not appearing, and the
>>> Login/Password inputboxes
On 09/23/2009 10:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
>
>> Just wondering if this problem has been reported:
>>
>> URL: http://localhost/admin
>>
>> 1) The Login.jpg image is not appearing, and the
>> Login/Password inputboxes are a bit off center
>> and to the right.
>
Daniel B. Thurman wrote:
> Just wondering if this problem has been reported:
>
> URL: http://localhost/admin
>
> 1) The Login.jpg image is not appearing, and the
> Login/Password inputboxes are a bit off center
> and to the right.
>
> 2) After logging in successfully, one is taken to:
44 matches
Mail list logo
