On Today at 5:45pm, MT=>Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
MT> [..snip..]
MT>
MT> Hmm, you might be hitting the point here. When tightening up the vhost
MT> mappings we probably overlooked the SSL (or any other protocol)
MT> scenario, where the actual vhost is the same, only the protocol is
Haroon Rafique wrote:
Your above question got me thinking and I said to myself, I don't harve any
VirtualHosts. And then, I remembered SSL. In my config for apache 2.2.6,
there is an include for conf/extra/httpd-ssl.conf and of course :443 is
served via a VirtualHost.
Hmm, you might be hi
On Yesterday at 11:58pm, RJ=>Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RJ>
RJ> [..snip..]
RJ>
RJ> The ugly: stricter handling of JkMount/JkMountFile etc. with respect
RJ> to virtual hosts. It should have behaved for a long time in the way,
RJ> that mounts are not inherited between virtual hosts a
