On 24.03.2011 15:55, ar...@bca-group.com wrote:
For the first time we have received this error (many times). Looks to me
like tomcat cannot talk to apache to me. Can anyone shed any light on
this?
Windows Server 2003
Tomcat: 6.0.16
Apache: 2.2
JDK: 1.6.0_23
Tomcat and Apache on same box so
For the first time we have received this error (many times). Looks to me
like tomcat cannot talk to apache to me. Can anyone shed any light on
this?
Windows Server 2003
Tomcat: 6.0.16
Apache: 2.2
JDK: 1.6.0_23
Tomcat and Apache on same box so I don't see how it can be a network
issue as
l'information seulement et n'aura pas n'importe
quel effet légalement obligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Tomcat + apache + mod_jk
Connector port=8009
protocol=AJP/1.3
redirectPort=8443 /
Martin Gainty mgai...@hotmail.com
24/03/2011 15:04
Please respond to
Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
To
Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
cc
Subject
RE: Tomcat + apache + mod_jk
can we see
Hi.
The schema is :
a) request :
browser -(1)- (apache + mod_jk) --(2)-- tomcat + app.
b) response :
browser -(1)-- (apache + mod_jk) --(2)-- tomcat + app.
So let's say that the browser sends the request, over connection (1), to apache.
apache creates connection (2) to tomcat, sends the
So I assume adding connectionTimeout attribute to the connector config
could help mitigate this?
André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com
24/03/2011 15:15
Please respond to
Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
To
Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Tomcat + apache + mod_jk
goes away as soon as it gets some answer ?
Maybe the apache logs can help you decide.
André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com
24/03/2011 15:15
Please respond to
Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
To
Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Tomcat + apache + mod_jk
Hi
ar...@bca-group.com wrote:
So I assume adding connectionTimeout attribute to the connector config
could help mitigate this?
The connectionTimeout of the Tomcat AJP Connector says this :
connectionTimeout
The number of milliseconds this Connector will wait, after accepting a
cc
Subject
Re: Tomcat + apache + mod_jk
ar...@bca-group.com wrote:
So I assume adding connectionTimeout attribute to the connector config
could help mitigate this?
The connectionTimeout of the Tomcat AJP Connector says this :
connectionTimeout
The number of milliseconds this Connector
I got busy at work and could not get back with information.
Chris, The inconsistencies you have pointed out are my mistake in the
email trying to clean up the URLs to shorten the strings and to remove
machine specific identifying information. The config files are
consistent and I still get the
On 04.12.2009 09:31, groupalias v wrote:
Also as I promised here is the mod_jk.log after running it in debug
mode ( please note that I am not looking for an answer but would still
be looking to figure out what's happening with mod_jk) --
Skipping init messages ...
[Tue Dec 01 14:13:01 2009]
I too saw that mod_jk thinks it is talking to tomcat. But I do not see
any logs in tomcat to indicate that.
Also with the same parameters mod_proxy_ajp is able to fetch my page.
Could be some nasty machine specific thing.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 12:45 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
On 12/1/2009 10:26 AM, André Warnier wrote:
groupalias v wrote:
httpd.conf
-
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
IfModule jk_module
What the h.. is this line for : ?
It's for
In response to Chris' question - I have only one tomcat instance
running and it picks up the webapps in /srv/tomcat6/webapps/
and the URL www.example.com:8080/test/index.jsp works fine. I tried
with the mod_jk.c and jk_module with the same result.
In response to André's question this is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vas,
On 12/2/2009 11:06 AM, groupalias v wrote:
In response to Chris' question - I have only one tomcat instance
running and it picks up the webapps in /srv/tomcat6/webapps/
and the URL www.example.com:8080/test/index.jsp works fine.
- From
Check again (I think André's) hint about JkMountCopy.
Regards,
Rainer
On 02.12.2009 17:33, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vas,
On 12/2/2009 11:06 AM, groupalias v wrote:
In response to Chris' question - I have only one tomcat instance
running and
groupalias v wrote:
In response to Chris' question - I have only one tomcat instance
running and it picks up the webapps in /srv/tomcat6/webapps/
and the URL www.example.com:8080/test/index.jsp works fine. I tried
with the mod_jk.c and jk_module with the same result.
In response to André's
Hi,
I am trying to set up mod_jk to forward requests to the webapp in
tomcat. The webapp itself works when accessed directly. But I get a
400 error in mod_jk when I try to access it (even the index.jsp)
through apache.
I see the error 400 in mod_jk.log but see nothing in tomcat logs. Its
as if
groupalias v wrote:
httpd.conf
-
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
IfModule jk_module
What the h.. is this line for : ?
Alias /test/ /srv/tomcat6/webapps/A
It kind of contradicts these next lines :
JKMount/test/ A
JkMount /test/* A
Because of
See answers inline -
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:26 AM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
groupalias v wrote:
httpd.conf
-
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
IfModule jk_module
What the h.. is this line for : ?
I don't understand. Am I using the wrong module
groupalias v wrote:
See answers inline -
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 7:26 AM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
groupalias v wrote:
httpd.conf
-
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
IfModule jk_module
What the h.. is this line for : ?
I don't understand. Am I using
Thanks for your reply. I am using the standalone tomcat app server, no web
server.
We are using tomcat 6.0.20. We installed the self signed certificate on it,
its working fine.
Now we installed the CA (goDaddy) certificate in order to use CA certificate
and updated the server.xml and restarted
From: Ashok Kumar [mailto:asho...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Debugging tomcat-apache(mod_jk) bridge
Thanks for your reply. I am using the standalone tomcat app server, no
web server.
You replied to the wrong thread - the subject line should have given you a
clue. No one has attempted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
All,
On 12/1/2009 10:26 AM, André Warnier wrote:
groupalias v wrote:
httpd.conf
-
LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so
IfModule jk_module
What the h.. is this line for : ?
It's for conditional inclusion of Apache
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/connectors.html#integrate
It depends.
If you (or your admins) can't do a good job of securing apache. Then one
could argue - that you be LESS secure if your ran apache in front of Tomcat.
Personally - the only reason I would run apache in front of Tomcat
because
Georg Zeiser wrote:
We want to run a java enterprise application on Tomcat. But we don't know
what is better, Tomcat (6.0.14) as standalone or Tomcat behind an Apache
(2.0.59 or 2.2.x) with mod_jk.
If a customer has Apache already installed, we will use the configuration
with mod_jk. But
26 matches
Mail list logo
