Hi,
I have a basic question about the tomcat server start-up. If there are
classes missing that are referenced as servlet entries in the web.xml should
this render the server unuseable?
I did a little test today with a web app, and when tomcat started it
reported class not found exceptions for
paul.ocklef...@nhs.net wrote:
Hi,
I have a basic question about the tomcat server start-up. If there are
classes missing that are referenced as servlet entries in the web.xml should
this render the server unuseable?
No. But it should, and I believe it does, render that web application
Ok thanks for the quick response!
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: 12 December 2008 11:50
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Web.xml entries
paul.ocklef...@nhs.net wrote:
Hi,
I have a basic question about the tomcat server start-up
Thanks for the sanity check. That did what I expected, so to expand on this, if
I were creating a real servlet whose source code opened like this:
package com.kilonovember.Monkey;
import javax.servlet.*;
import javax.servlet.http.*;
import java.io.*;
public class Monkey extends HttpServlet{
..
More like:
package com.kilonovember ;
// imports here
public class Monkey extends HttpServlet{
// methods and programming
}
Note I didn't include the class name in the package name. This creates
a class with the full name of com.kilonovember.Monkey.
--David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
] - email
-Original Message-
From: David Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:28:29 -0500
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: What, exactly, is meant by full path when construction
web.xml entries
More like:
package