Am 09.08.2017 um 11:50 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
Hi Martin,
Am 04.08.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
Hi,
just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next".
The documentation states:
"If method is set to N[e
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Am 04.08.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next".
>> The documentation states:
>>
>> "If method is set to N[ext] the balancer will again use
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Martin,
>
> On 8/4/17 4:53 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method
> > "Next". Th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Martin,
On 8/4/17 4:53 AM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method
> "Next". The documentation states:
>
> "If method is set to N[ext] the balancer will again use the number
> of sessions
Hi Martin,
Am 04.08.2017 um 10:53 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
Hi,
just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next".
The documentation states:
"If method is set to N[ext] the balancer will again use the number of
sessions to find the best worker. All remarks concerning the
Hi,
just need some clarification on the mod_jk load blanacing method "Next".
The documentation states:
"If method is set to N[ext] the balancer will again use the number of
sessions to find the best worker. All remarks concerning the Session method
apply as well. The difference to the Session me
Hello Good People -
I'm trying to determine the best route in which to load balance multiple
tomcats, what should I be taking into consideration when choosing between
SonicWall's NetScaler or in continuing to use mod_jk? This question isn't
meant to fuel a purchase decision as we have already acq
Hi,
I'm reading the document about load balancing method of mod_jk
workers.properties. However, I don't understand why "Next" is better
than "Session" if numbers of sessions is small. How does the count
reducing method affect an election of the best worker?
Could anyone explain the theory?
Rega
Shoaib M. Chaudhary schrieb am 27.01.2011 um 09:08 (+0500):
> When I use mod_jk with the following code for one worker it works fine
> but when I try to connect with two tomcat servers that are not on the
> same machine on which I have apache. Interestingly when I use one
> worker as localhost it
Hello,
The problem I detected is that client has to send three requests for home
page as it contains frames. How can I force mod_jk to send all requests to
one server.
I come to this result while I shutdown one server called tomcat3 and restart
a tomcat on that machine (tomcat3) with no applicati
The problem is following,
When I use mod_jk with the following code for one worker it works fine but
when I try to connect with two tomcat servers that are not on the same
machine on which I have apache. Interestingly when I use one worker as
localhost it works fine again.
There is no error but t
Shoaib M. Chaudhary schrieb am 26.01.2011 um 15:48 (+0500):
> I am trying to use mod_jk with tomcat 5.5.3x. When I use mode_jk with
> one worker it works fine
Okay.
> but when I use loadbalancer with two different tomcats the server
> doesn't response
No response at all? Or some error status?
Hello,
I am trying to use mod_jk with tomcat 5.5.3x. When I use mode_jk with one
worker it works fine but when I use loadbalancer with two different tomcats
the server doesn't response but always try to refresh the page. Can any one
help me out please.
Regards *
Shoaib
*
retrying requests and the
caching of request. I believe the conclusion was that it would be
possible to implement but not necessarily simple.
Regards
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Hole [mailto:andremailingl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 January 2009 11:14
> To: Tomcat Users Li
Hi Guys!
What is the behavior of mod_jk if one of the workers stops?
Mod_jk stops to send requests to that worker? Or it retries at each request
and only after determine that the worker is down , it sends the request to
the fine worker ?
# --
# Load Balancer worker
#
Nathan E. Pilling wrote:
Is it possible to configure mod_jk to check node status by requesting
a specific web application path to see if a cluster node is healthy
(and should be included or excluded from the cluster)?
I have a web application that runs across multiple tomcat instances
and any re
Is it possible to configure mod_jk to check node status by requesting a
specific web application path to see if a cluster node is healthy (and should
be included or excluded from the cluster)?
I have a web application that runs across multiple tomcat instances and any
request be processed by an
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Eddie Yee wrote:
Hi,
We use a combination of Tomcat 5.5.25, mod_jk (v1.25) and sun one web
server (v6.1).The Sun Java web server points to 5 instances of
tomcat as specified in our obj.conf and worker.properties.
I know that currently if the application is not in
Eddie Yee wrote:
Hi,
We use a combination of Tomcat 5.5.25, mod_jk (v1.25) and sun one web server (v6.1).The Sun Java web server points to 5 instances of tomcat as specified in our obj.conf and worker.properties.
I know that currently if the application is not in a started state and To
Hi,
We use a combination of Tomcat 5.5.25, mod_jk (v1.25) and sun one web server
(v6.1).The Sun Java web server points to 5 instances of tomcat as specified
in our obj.conf and worker.properties.
I know that currently if the application is not in a started state and Tomcat
is up and r
them.
So I would appreciate if somebody could tell me what to put in every
necessary file on apache, mod_jk conf and tomcat's server.xml.
Thanks.
Grega
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:43 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subjec
Hello Gregor,
did you configure jk_mounts in jk.conf ? They determine, what is passed on
via the loadbalancer-worker to tomcat.
Also, I dislike the idea to habe the same ajp-Port al all instances (or do
they have different names?).
Finally, do not forget to set the individual jvm_route on the
Hi all,
I'm trying to configure mod_jk as load balancer and I was not so
successful so far.
My environment architecture looks like this:
2 servers running each 3 instances of JBoss/tomcat Aplication server
with ports 8080,8081 and 8082.
Into each server instance I add AJP 13 protocol l
hing works.
- Sean
-Original Message-
From: Sean Neeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:34 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with SSL?
Tim,
Thank you. That was very helpful. It looks like your settings are very
similar to mine. The dif
t'
Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with SSL?
I do -- here are some snippets from the configuration files:
conf.d/ssl.conf:
LoadModule ssl_module modules/mod_ssl.so
Listen 443
ServerName www.mycompanyname.com:443
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/httpd/conf/ssl.key/server.key
Document
worker.wlb.sticky_session=1
worker.wlb.sticky_session_force=0
worker.jkstatus.type=status
Tim
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Neeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 5:05 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: RE: mod_jk load balancing with SSL?
No one has ever done this? Help?!
-Original Message-
From: Sean Neeley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:16 PM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: mod_jk load balancing with SSL?
I'm using Apache Tomcat/5.5.15 and trying to get load balancing working
wit
I'm using Apache Tomcat/5.5.15 and trying to get load balancing working
with SSL. Are there any tricks to this setup? I have two tomcat
instances on one server, and I want to split sessions between them.
I've set this up before without SSL on a different machine, but on this
one particular server
I'm resubmitting this since we didn't get any response from the original
posting. In the meantime, we've tried duplicating the problem in a
non-production environment, but have been unsuccessful in reproducing the problem.
The problem, again, is that users with established sessions on one of t
We currently have the following setup: Two Tomcat servers and two Apache web
servers using the JK connector to load balance the Tomcat servers. There is a
Cisco PIX firewall between the Apache servers and the Tomcat servers, but we are
using the keepalive option (see config below).
Apache 2.
Are you using sticky sessions?
if you are using sticky sessions, the apache will route all the requests
from the same user to the same server.
this property is defined in worker.properties file.
Thanks,
Pankaj
Edmon Begoli wrote:
MOD_JK documentation says that mod_jk is employing weighted roun
MOD_JK documentation says that mod_jk is employing weighted round robin load
balancing.
However, if all workers are assigned weight of one I do not see exact round
robin I would expect.
I do not see uniform round robin distribution among peer servers I would
expect to see. It seems that there is
32 matches
Mail list logo