Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-12-07 Thread daneturner
/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-tf1825380.html#a7750978 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-12-07 Thread Rainer Jung
Thanks, Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4979143 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com. - To start a new topic, e-mail: users

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-12-07 Thread daneturner
. Problem solved. Apologies for the sloppy post :-\ Dane -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-tf1825380.html#a7751349 Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-07-03 Thread Rainer Jung
We just now tagged 1.2.16. A release candidate is available. Please have a look at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=115194553720728w=2 Test results are welcome. If no new problems will be found, the release vote will procees starting Friday. The final release will be announced on

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-07-03 Thread Rainer Jung
worker.latin1.lbfactor=1 worker.latin1.distance=1 worker.latin2.port=8009 worker.latin2.host=latin2 worker.latin2.type=ajp13 worker.latin2.lbfactor=1 worker.latin2.distance=1 Thanks, Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380

RE: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-22 Thread Per Johnsson
Hi! Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere? Found this: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html Regards Per -Original Message- From: Mladen Turk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: den 21 juni 2006 21:14 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk failover

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-22 Thread David Rees
On 6/22/06, Per Johnsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is 1.2.16 avaiable for download somewhere? Not that I know of, you have to grab the source from SVN. Found this: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/news/20060505.html I wonder how that got there! -Dave

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
=latin2 worker.latin2.type=ajp13 worker.latin2.lbfactor=1 worker.latin2.distance=1 Thanks, Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4979143 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread thuss2
unrelated to the issue we're seeing though which is that mod_jk seems to be completely ignoring the distance parameter. -Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4980476 Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only took 0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that? Recent mod_jk versions can take True/False instead 1/0 just as an convenience method. Also the 'distance' param will be

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread thuss2
That explains it, thanks. I've just set the lbfactor extremely high on the localhost in the interim to get mod_jk to prefer it over remote tomcats. -Todd -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/mod_jk-failover-and-preferring-localhost-t1825380.html#a4980806 Sent from the Tomcat

Re: mod_jk failover and preferring localhost

2006-06-21 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mladen Turk wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: you've setup sticky_sessions to be false, (btw, I thought that only took 0/1 values) so how can you expect session affinity from that? Recent mod_jk versions can take True/False instead 1/0 just as an convenience method. instead or as well,