On 04/11/2010 20:01, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Honestlyno, I didn't.
The mod_jk scared the hell out of mewouldn't you? :-)
Using this option will have a strong performance penalty for Apache and
Tomcat. Use this only as a last resort in case of unfixable network
problems.
Experience has
Rainer, that's very true.
So I am wondering...If 1200 200 (Tomcat maxThreads), then what would be
the right way to solve this? Imagine that 2 Tomcats would crash, that would
leave me with 1200 400. I can't just raise the maxThreads to 600 for each
Tomcat, as that would probably perform even
I just got my own question answered whether connection_pool_size sets a pool
per server process.
This defines the number of connections made to the AJP backend that are
maintained as a connection pool. It will limit the number of those
connection that each web server child process can made.
This
On 04/11/2010 19:27, Marc Wilmots wrote:
The best solution would be to enable DisableReuse as Mark stated, although
I'm afraid that would be too big of a performance hit.
Have you tried it?
The cost of the required CPING/CPONG isn't that different to the cost of
creating a TCP/IP connection.
Honestlyno, I didn't.
The mod_jk scared the hell out of mewouldn't you? :-)
Using this option will have a strong performance penalty for Apache and
Tomcat. Use this only as a last resort in case of unfixable network
problems.
I'll give it a try tomorrow and see what it gives.
By the
Forget about my math question.
Obviously, connection_pool_size of 15, would mean there are 60 (4 tomcats)
in total per server process.
Then the math works out
Sorry, it's 1:08am over here :-)
2010/11/5 Marc Wilmots desj...@gmail.com
Honestlyno, I didn't.
The mod_jk scared the hell out
On 26.10.2010 20:36, Marc Wilmots wrote:
2010/10/26 Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org
On 10/26/2010 02:47 PM, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi Experts,
I have the following setup:
Apache1
/ \
Apache2 Apache3
\ /
Thanks a lot Mladen, I really appreciate your help.
About the AJP leaving connections open; If you hadn't @apache.org in
your email address I wouldn't believe you ;)
2010/10/26, Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org:
On 10/26/2010 08:36 PM, Marc Wilmots wrote:
1200 1000, thus your theory is probably
On 26/10/2010 16:08, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi again.
I checked out the executor element, although, I can't find a lot of
information about it.
Would you mind explaining why using the executor element would fix the
problem I am having?
The Executor will reduce the size of the thread pool once
On 27/10/2010 11:08, Pid wrote:
On 26/10/2010 16:08, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi again.
I checked out the executor element, although, I can't find a lot of
information about it.
Would you mind explaining why using the executor element would fix the
problem I am having?
The Executor will
On 27/10/2010 11:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/10/2010 11:08, Pid wrote:
On 26/10/2010 16:08, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi again.
I checked out the executor element, although, I can't find a lot of
information about it.
Would you mind explaining why using the executor element would fix the
Hi Experts,
I have the following setup:
Apache1
/ \
Apache2 Apache3
\ /
Tomcat1
All Apaches are version 2.2.3 (RedHat)
Apache2 and Apache3 loadbalance Tomcat1 (6.0.18) with mod_jk (2.2.28).
In idle state
On 26/10/2010 13:47, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi Experts,
I have the following setup:
Apache1
/ \
Apache2 Apache3
\ /
Tomcat1
That's an interesting setup. What does it achieve?
All Apaches are version 2.2.3 (RedHat)
Time for an
2010/10/26 Pid p...@pidster.com
On 26/10/2010 13:47, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi Experts,
I have the following setup:
Apache1
/ \
Apache2 Apache3
\ /
Tomcat1
That's an interesting setup. What does it achieve?
Apache1 is
Hi again.
I checked out the executor element, although, I can't find a lot of
information about it.
Would you mind explaining why using the executor element would fix the
problem I am having?
Thanks
2010/10/26 Pid p...@pidster.com
On 26/10/2010 13:47, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi Experts,
I
On 10/26/2010 02:47 PM, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi Experts,
I have the following setup:
Apache1
/ \
Apache2 Apache3
\ /
Tomcat1
All Apaches are version 2.2.3 (RedHat)
Apache2 and Apache3 loadbalance
2010/10/26 Mladen Turk mt...@apache.org
On 10/26/2010 02:47 PM, Marc Wilmots wrote:
Hi Experts,
I have the following setup:
Apache1
/ \
Apache2 Apache3
\ /
Tomcat1
All Apaches are version 2.2.3
On 10/26/2010 08:36 PM, Marc Wilmots wrote:
1200 1000, thus your theory is probably right.
:)
However, I'm just
wondering... I read that when Tomcat reaches the max number of connections,
just rejects new connections (I'm omitting the backlog on purpose).
So, I can understand that my
18 matches
Mail list logo
