Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?

2007-11-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
application running under Tomcat. I'm using Apache 2 as Web server. Basically, I have two opportunities: 1) mod_jk 2) mod_proxy I've tried the first. So I discover that I ve: - Create an alias in httpd.conf so that al static pages are processed directly by Apache2. - Use JkMount directive so

Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?

2007-11-19 Thread Rainer Jung
Rocco Scappatura wrote: Hello. I would like to publish a Web application running under Tomcat. I'm using Apache 2 as Web server. Basically, I have two opportunities: 1) mod_jk 2) mod_proxy I've tried the first. So I discover that I ve: - Create an alias in httpd.conf so that al static

Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?

2007-11-19 Thread Rocco Scappatura
put this in your servlet.xml file Host name=localhost appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false !-- Added this for JK THIS-- Listener className=org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig append=true forwardAll=false modJk=Path/To/mod_jk.so /

Re: mod_proxy or mod_jk?

2007-11-18 Thread Johnny Kewl
Scappatura [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@tomcat.apache.org Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 3:20 AM Subject: mod_proxy or mod_jk? You need to post your config files for real help... I think everyone is tired of arguing the differences... just google for that. I like mod_jk just because its worked