Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 4/25/12 4:21 PM, Pid wrote: > On 25/04/2012 15:57, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Pid, >> >> On 4/23/12 9:50 PM, Pid wrote: >>> On 23/04/2012 15:06, Christopher Schultz wrote: Christoph, On 4/22/12 11:55 AM, Christoph Maser wro

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-25 Thread Pid
On 25/04/2012 15:57, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Pid, > > On 4/23/12 9:50 PM, Pid wrote: >> On 23/04/2012 15:06, Christopher Schultz wrote: >>> Christoph, >>> >>> On 4/22/12 11:55 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: Chris, >>> Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Christopher

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-25 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Pid, On 4/23/12 9:50 PM, Pid wrote: > On 23/04/2012 15:06, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> Christoph, >> >> On 4/22/12 11:55 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: >>> Chris, >> >>> Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Christopher >>> Schultz:

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-23 Thread Pid
On 23/04/2012 15:06, Christopher Schultz wrote: > Christoph, > > On 4/22/12 11:55 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: >> Chris, > >> Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Christopher >> Schultz: >>> Christoph, >>> >>> What about the webapp itself performing its own health-check as a >>> last

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-23 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christoph, On 4/22/12 11:55 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: > Chris, > > Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Christopher > Schultz: >> Christoph, >> >> What about the webapp itself performing its own health-check as a >> last step of deplo

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-22 Thread Christoph Maser
Chris, Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Christopher Schultz: > Christoph, > > What about the webapp itself performing its own health-check as a last > step of deployment, and throwing an exception (thereby preventing > Tomcat from bringing it into service) if things aren't in wo

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-19 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christoph, On 4/19/12 2:34 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: > Well the idea is to have additional saftey measures that check if > the webapp is in the desired state after the context is started. > This is done by sending queries against the webapp for stand

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-19 Thread Pid *
On 19 Apr 2012, at 08:07, "ma...@apache.org" wrote: > Christoph Maser wrote: > >> Am Donnerstag, den 12.04.2012, 14:02 +0100 schrieb ma...@apache.org: >>> Christoph Maser wrote: >>> Do you see any chance a request for feature in that direction would >> be accpeted? >>> >>> Right now,

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-19 Thread markt
Christoph Maser wrote: >Am Donnerstag, den 12.04.2012, 14:02 +0100 schrieb ma...@apache.org: >> Christoph Maser wrote: >> >> >Do you see any chance a request for feature in that direction would >be >> >accpeted? >> >> Right now, no. I don't see a requirement that isn't met by the >existing imp

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-18 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 12.04.2012, 14:02 +0100 schrieb ma...@apache.org: > Christoph Maser wrote: > > >Do you see any chance a request for feature in that direction would be > >accpeted? > > Right now, no. I don't see a requirement that isn't met by the existing > implementation. If there was a use

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-12 Thread Christoph Maser
Am Donnerstag, den 12.04.2012, 14:29 -0400 schrieb Christopher Schultz: > It's worth mentioning that requests bound to sessions that were > associated with the "old" version will continue to be serviced by the > old version of the webapp. > > You said "new requests" but "new sessions" is more accu

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-12 Thread Christopher Schultz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christoph, On 4/12/12 2:42 AM, Christoph Maser wrote: > is there a way to externally influence the switch between versions > with the new parallel deployment method. As I understand it tomcat > automatically switches to the new version for new reques

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-12 Thread markt
Christoph Maser wrote: >Do you see any chance a request for feature in that direction would be >accpeted? Right now, no. I don't see a requirement that isn't met by the existing implementation. If there was a use case that wasn't completely off the wall that couldn't be met then it would get l

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-12 Thread Christoph Maser
Do you see any chance a request for feature in that direction would be accpeted? Chris Am Donnerstag, den 12.04.2012, 09:40 +0100 schrieb Mark Thomas: > The only control you have is by ensuring that the version you want to be used > by default has the highest version number. > > Mark > > Chri

Re: parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-12 Thread Mark Thomas
The only control you have is by ensuring that the version you want to be used by default has the highest version number. Mark Christoph Maser wrote: >Hi > >is there a way to externally influence the switch between versions with >the new parallel deployment method. As I understand it tomcat >a

parallel deployment activation of new version

2012-04-11 Thread Christoph Maser
Hi is there a way to externally influence the switch between versions with the new parallel deployment method. As I understand it tomcat automatically switches to the new version for new requests as soon as the context with the new version is started. Instead I would like to manually control wich