Re: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-20 Thread Gregor Schneider
argl - sorry, chuck, you're right: the "2" just dropped from my fingers, i'm talking about mod_jk (this one: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html) thanks for the correction! greg -- what's puzzlin' you, is the nature of my game gpgp-fp: 79A84FA526807026795E4209D3B3

RE: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-20 Thread Caldarale, Charles R
> From: Gregor Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: performance with apache and tomcat > > i'd do it the apache way with mod_jk2. > > we are running two hardware-loadbalanced servers each having > apache-httpd / mod_jk2 / tomcat 55-setup, and it runs l

Re: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-20 Thread Gregor Schneider
It always depends on... if the focus is on the servlets (meaning around 70% of the requests are satisfied by your servlets), maybe you want to give a tomcat-only-setup a try. however, if the focus is on static / php / perl-content an less than 50% of the requests are satisfied by servlets, i'd pu

RE: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Peter Crowther
> From: Eqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > What causes any performance overhead in using apache > with Tomcat, considering they will be on the same > server? Each request must be (at least minimally) processed by Apache, the request forwarded over the JK connector to Tomcat, Tomcat processing

Re: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Leon Rosenberg
gt; Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:30 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: performance with apache and tomcat > > unless you explicitely need the httpd I wouldn't put > it in front of > tomcat, since besides less performance and security > issues (last one > like a mo

RE: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Gary Evesson
Subject: RE: performance with apache and tomcat We will need to use SSL. What causes any performance overhead in using apache with Tomcat, considering they will be on the same server? --- Gary Evesson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Unless of course you need mod_rewrite. We also > handl

RE: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Eqbal
t up. > > Gary Evesson > Decentrix Inc > > -Original Message- > From: Leon Rosenberg > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:30 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: performance with apache and tomcat > > unless you explici

RE: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Gary Evesson
Unless of course you need mod_rewrite. We also handle millions a day with exactly this set up. Gary Evesson Decentrix Inc -Original Message- From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 1:30 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: performance with apache

Re: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Leon Rosenberg
unless you explicitely need the httpd I wouldn't put it in front of tomcat, since besides less performance and security issues (last one like a month (?) ago with mod_jk) it doesn't bring you any benefits. Without knowing your requests (duration, resources they consume etc) its hard to make any es

RE: performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Sheets, Jerald
We serve millions daily on Tomcat + Apache + mod_jk. I think you'll be ok with the standard way of running Tomcat. --JMS -Original Message- From: Eqbal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:22 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: performance with apach

performance with apache and tomcat

2007-04-19 Thread Eqbal
Hello, We are planning on using Tomcat as the Servlet container for one of our production systems. I would like to know if there are any performance issues using it together with Apache webserver 2.0 and the ajp connector (using mod_rewrite). Is performance expected to be better if we double up To