Let me know if you find one, I was faced with the same issue a while ago
I was basically told: you have to use apache
I did not want to have (in my opinion) second web server running for just
that purpose
I ended up created a second context in tomcat that allows access to the
static content
From: John Laughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: static server implementation?
I ended up created a second context in tomcat that allows
access to the static content (ie. large jpegs)
I'm confused. Why wasn't Tomcat's default servlet sufficient? It's
sole purpose is to deliver
/2005 -0500, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: John Laughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: static server implementation?
I ended up created a second context in tomcat that allows
access to the static content (ie. large jpegs)
I'm confused. Why wasn't Tomcat's default servlet
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: John Laughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: static server implementation?
I ended up created a second context in tomcat that allows
access to the static content (ie. large jpegs)
I'm confused. Why wasn't Tomcat's default servlet sufficient? It's
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Robert Koberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: static server implementation?
If you have a need for many virtual hosts, but do not need
or want any ability for dynamic activity it would make sense
to have a limited version of a tomcat host/context. I
Steve Kirk wrote:
Have you considered that you can remove much of the dynamic config from
conf\web.xml so that there is no default servlet or other dynamic behaviour
in any webapp unless you explictly configure it so in the webapp's own
web.xml?
Right, but say an evil user creates a
: John Laughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: static
server implementation?
I ended up created a second context in tomcat that allows access to
the static content (ie. large jpegs)
I'm confused. Why wasn't Tomcat's default servlet sufficient? It's
sole purpose is to deliver static
...
But any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!
Maurice Yarrow
Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: John Laughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: static server implementation?
I ended up created a second context in tomcat that allows
access to the static content (ie. large
