On 24/09/2010 18:11, Jason Pringle wrote:
>
> On 09/23/2010 2:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> Several release attempts have failed due to a lack of interest.
>
> Lack of interest by whom? The development team or the tomcat community?
Anyone apart from the original developer. You'll see a little
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: tomcat connection pool - status and future?
> Is he in the /US/ National Guard?
Yes.
> He lives in Colorado, right?
Last I heard. (Haven't actually seen him in about two years.)
- Chuck
T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 9/24/2010 2:04 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>> Subject: Re: tomcat connection pool - status and future?
>
>> To answer your question of markt: tomc
> From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
> Subject: Re: tomcat connection pool - status and future?
> To answer your question of markt: tomcat-dbcp has stagnated due
> to lack of interest from the Tomcat dev team itself.
Also note that Filip is off on Na
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
On 9/24/2010 1:26 PM, Jason Pringle wrote:
> On 9/24/2010 7:24 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> What's wrong with LGPL? I'm not trying to start a holy war... just
>> curious about your objections.
>
> Our legal department detests LGPL (lack o
Chris,
On 9/24/2010 7:24 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> What issues are you thinking of, specifically. These?
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/jdbc-pool.html
Googling around shows many complaints about multithreaded behavior and
connection dropping.
Which (to me) suggests at leas
On 09/23/2010 2:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Several release attempts have failed due to a lack of interest.
Lack of interest by whom? The development team or the tomcat community?
> That said, $work is using this as the default pool in a commercial
> product based on Tomcat with minimal issue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeff,
On 9/24/2010 11:14 AM, Jeff Hubbs wrote:
> On 9/24/10 10:24 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>>
>> The biggest problem with C3P0 is that it's unsupported (I heard... I
>> can't find anywhere that it says the project is actually dead, but it's
>>
On 9/24/10 10:24 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The biggest problem with C3P0 is that it's unsupported (I heard... I
can't find anywhere that it says the project is actually dead, but it's
been over 3 years since their last release, and it's clearly labeled
"beta"). It looks like they might be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jason,
On 9/23/2010 4:26 PM, Jason Pringle wrote:
> I started by researching available connection pools for tomcat, and
> it seems most folks either use DBCP (which has a host of issues)
What issues are you thinking of, specifically. These?
http://pe
On 23/09/2010 13:26, Jason Pringle wrote:
>
> I've recently become aware of the new-ish tomcat connection pool
> (http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/) which appears to be at version
> 1.0.8.5 (a January 2010 release?).
>
> Before I recommend we begin using this in a production situation
I've recently become aware of the new-ish tomcat connection pool
(http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/jdbc-pool/) which appears to be at version
1.0.8.5 (a January 2010 release?).
Before I recommend we begin using this in a production situation, I'd like to
gather a bit of data on it. As a bit o
12 matches
Mail list logo
