On 08/04/2013 15:32, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chuck,
On 4/8/13 8:30 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com] Subject: Re:
websockets holding on to threads.
My thinking about it being a bug is that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chuck,
On 4/8/13 8:30 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com] Subject: Re:
>> websockets holding on to threads.
>
>> My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clien
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote on 08/04/2013
13:30:00:
> From: "Caldarale, Charles R"
> > From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com]
> > My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clients with
> > websockets, you need N threads available on tomcat, even though they
are
>
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Caldarale, Charles R <
chuck.caldar...@unisys.com> wrote:
> > From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com]
> > Subject: Re: websockets holding on to threads.
>
> > My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clients with
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Anton Piatek1 wrote:
> >
>
Multiple tabs/windows is one thing, but multiple clients are just as big a
> problem.
>
Not a problem or a concern in my web app. Endusers are trained to use the
web app in 'one' browser tab/window 'per device'; every now and then, I can
> From: Anton Piatek1 [mailto:anton.pia...@uk.ibm.com]
> Subject: Re: websockets holding on to threads.
> My thinking about it being a bug is that to support N clients with
> websockets, you need N threads available on tomcat, even though they are
> only getting updates every
"Howard W. Smith, Jr." wrote on 05/04/2013
21:22:33:
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Anton Piatek1
wrote:
>
> > I am seeing what at first appears to be a bug, but given the lack of
other
> > reports I can't believe I am the only person seeing this, so maybe it
is
> > user-error.
> >
> > I h
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Anton Piatek1 wrote:
> I am seeing what at first appears to be a bug, but given the lack of other
> reports I can't believe I am the only person seeing this, so maybe it is
> user-error.
>
> I have tomcat (was 7.0.30, but I just tried with 7.0.39) running a website
I am seeing what at first appears to be a bug, but given the lack of other
reports I can't believe I am the only person seeing this, so maybe it is
user-error.
I have tomcat (was 7.0.30, but I just tried with 7.0.39) running a website
which uses websockets. The websockets code in tomcat isn't t
