Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Bill Barker
Brad O'Hearne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] After wasting time trying to configure mod_jk, I thought I'd just wipe my mind free and just play dumb for a moment. If Apache can proxy requests using mod_proxy, what is the benefit of using mod_jk as an integration

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Mladen Turk
Brad O'Hearne wrote: After wasting time trying to configure mod_jk, I thought I'd just wipe my mind free and just play dumb for a moment. If Apache can proxy requests using mod_proxy, what is the benefit of using mod_jk as an integration technique between httpd and tomcat, Faster up to 50%

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that how do I integrate tomcat and apache httpd? is such a mystery / unknown. This seems like it would be question #1 on any Tomcat FAQ. So where can I found out more about mod_proxy_ajp. Is there a Tomcat resource which

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Bill Barker
Brad O'Hearne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that how do I integrate tomcat and apache httpd? is such a mystery / unknown. This seems like it would be question #1 on any Tomcat FAQ. So where can I

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jess Holle
If you're using Apache 1.3.x or 2.0.x, mod_jk is pretty simple overall. No, you don't want to even try in-process stuff and, yes, if you have a firewall in between Apache and Tomcat that drops idle connections you should read carefully (this is covered by the docs). The only big complaint I

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
Jess, Thanks for the reply. Responses below: On Feb 24, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Jess Holle wrote: If you're using Apache 1.3.x or 2.0.x, mod_jk is pretty simple overall. No, you don't want to even try in-process stuff and, yes, if you have a firewall in between Apache and Tomcat that drops

Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I spend any more time trying to get this configured, I would like to know what is the best way to proceed: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? Thanks, Brad On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Brad O'Hearne wrote: Jess, Thanks for the reply.

RE: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Fenlason, Josh
PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:02 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?) I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I spend any more time trying to get this configured, I would like to know what

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
Question below: On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:05 AM, Bill Barker wrote: Brad O'Hearne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that how do I integrate tomcat and apache httpd? is such a mystery / unknown. This

Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Brad O'Hearne
is the way to go. , Josh. -Original Message- From: Brad O'Hearne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:02 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?) I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jess Holle
Brad O'Hearne wrote: I am looking forward to mod_proxy_ajp as it is supposed be a tiny bit faster. You say you are looking forward to mod_proxy_ajp -- does this mean its not available yet, or you just aren't using it yet? While I am glad to learn now of mod_proxy_ajp, I guess this kind of

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jess Holle
Brad O'Hearne wrote: Ok, I understand what it is trying to do here. But I assume there is a connector that has to be loaded in Tomcat to enable listening for the ajp protocol on port 8009, no? Is there documentation about this anywhere? From Tomcat's side of the connection there is no

RE: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Fenlason, Josh
Message- From: Brad O'Hearne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:14 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?) Josh, Thanks a lot for your answer. I am using Apache 2.2.x. Now onto my next question

Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use mod_jk?)

2006-02-24 Thread Chris Lear
* Brad O'Hearne wrote (24/02/06 15:14): Josh, Thanks a lot for your answer. I am using Apache 2.2.x. Now onto my next question. Bill Barker suggested the httpd.conf / mod_proxy_ajp directive side of the equation. Doesn't there have to be a connector in tomcat's server.xml which will

Re: why use mod_jk?

2006-02-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Feb 24, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Brad O'Hearne wrote: Question below: On Feb 24, 2006, at 2:05 AM, Bill Barker wrote: Brad O'Hearne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to believe that how do I integrate tomcat and

why use mod_jk?

2006-02-23 Thread Brad O'Hearne
After wasting time trying to configure mod_jk, I thought I'd just wipe my mind free and just play dumb for a moment. If Apache can proxy requests using mod_proxy, what is the benefit of using mod_jk as an integration technique between httpd and tomcat, if integration is *not* in-process, which