Re: What causes "client errors" with mod_jk

2022-05-27 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi Chris, Am 27.05.2022 um 01:49 schrieb Christopher Schultz: On 5/26/22 17:25, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 26.05.2022 um 21:49 schrieb Christopher Schultz: Would you prefer to use mod_unique_id + unique-id-logging in mod_jk over just adding more request-level information to the mod_jk.log? I'm

Re: allowHostHeaderMismatch option only works if the Host Header has an http or https prefix

2022-05-27 Thread Christopher Schultz
Mark, On 5/27/22 3:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 27/05/2022 02:00, Ralph Atallah wrote: Hi Mark, Thanks again for the prompt response. You wrote below:  "If the original request only has a Host header, then allowHostHeaderMismatch="false" isn't going to do anything because there is no

RE: allowHostHeaderMismatch option only works if the Host Header has an http or https prefix

2022-05-27 Thread Ralph Atallah
Hi Chris, I suspect that if we were to take the time to set up a proxy, according to RFC7230, we would be able to get the absolute-form to reach the Tomcat code and in that case, based on reading the AbostractHttp11Processor class, I suspect the allowHostHeaderMismatch will kick in and will

RE: allowHostHeaderMismatch option only works if the Host Header has an http or https prefix

2022-05-27 Thread Ralph Atallah
Hi Mark, Thank you for your help. It took some digging to fully understand the nuances in your answers below. Here are some pointers to anyone who experiences the same issue in the future and to whom these pointers might be helpful. 1. Although I had previously visited the link to the

Re: allowHostHeaderMismatch option only works if the Host Header has an http or https prefix

2022-05-27 Thread Mark Thomas
On 27/05/2022 02:00, Ralph Atallah wrote: Hi Mark, Thanks again for the prompt response. You wrote below: "If the original request only has a Host header, then allowHostHeaderMismatch="false" isn't going to do anything because there is no mismatch.". I am not clear on what this means. What