On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 11:08:07 +0530, sasidhar prabhakar
sasidhar1...@gmail.com wrote:
I didn't understand below, in DAO class everything fine.
Connection,PreparedStatement,ResultSet are all declared method local,
and
closed properly.
Within finally clause?
Please guide me to solve the
We are using struts and following DAO pattern.
This is the code
public String getCountryName(long ipSum){
String name = null;
Connection connection = null;
PreparedStatement pstmt = null;
ResultSet rs = null;
try{
connection =
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:20:48 +0530, sasidhar prabhakar
sasidhar1...@gmail.com wrote:
We are using struts and following DAO pattern.
Looks fine. Does the problem occur everytime?
--
Mikolaj Rydzewski m...@ceti.pl
-
To
Yes it is.
I have one doubt. Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
connection established and did not close it.
Is remove abandoned, will close the connection after time out and places it
back to pool. Is it really closes the connection?
for example I configured pool with 200
On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
Yes it is.
I have one doubt.
You have a question not a doubt and you have more than one of them.
Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
connection established and did not close it.
Yes.
Is remove abandoned, will close the
On 4 November 2010 10:54, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
I have one doubt.
You have a question not a doubt
I see this on many forums, and have come to realise it's associated with
speakers of at least one of the widely-used languages in
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/11/2010 05:01, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
Is abandoned trace really shows the code where the
connection established and did not close it.
Yes.
The code I posted above is clean and properly closed all of
The code you posted looks fine but without the complete class it is hard
to say 100% your class is fine.
-Original Message-
From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 November 2010 11:36
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned trace - unable to
The complete class has only two methods. And class is
import connection.ConnectionUtil;
import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.ResultSet;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.util.Calendar;
import javax.sql.DataSource;
import
2010/11/4 Will Sumekar will.sume...@gmail.com:
listener
listener-classorg.springframework.web.context.ContextLoaderListener/listener-class
/listener
AFAIK, you have to specify contextConfigLocation context parameter
with location of your application context xml file.
BTW, the log that you
The full class looks ok to me. Your issues must be elsewhere.
-Original Message-
From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 November 2010 12:05
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: DBCP abandoned trace - unable to understand the leak
The complete class has
The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything closed
fine.
Then why it is showing like this
DBCP object created 2010-11-04 11:07:59 by the following code was never
closed:
java.lang.Exception
at
Are you sure it is running against the code you think it is running
against. Try changing something that is output to the log files and make
sure you see this change before the abandoned stack trace is thrown.
-Original Message-
From: sasidhar prabhakar [mailto:sasidhar1...@gmail.com]
I've googled and not found anything very helpful, particularly nothing
recent.
I am trying to set up AJP load balancing using Apache 2.2.17 to Tomcat
6.0.29.
I'd like to route root to the Tomcat named context (not root). From the
docs I've read so far, I should be able to, but all the
AFAIK if you dont specify contextConfigLocation system looks for default
filename applicationContext.xml at default location of ./WEB-INF/. But it
doesnt matter cos even if I put context-param the error still comes.
So far it looks like the error is caused by listener. Once I remove it,
it's OK.
Not sure if it matters or not, but in your SponserSummaryDAO method, it
appears you establish the rs as null, but don't ever close it? You might
specifically try that.
And is it necessary to reassign all those variables (connection, rs, pstmt) to
null again in those catch blocks?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sasidhar,
On 11/4/2010 8:34 AM, sasidhar prabhakar wrote:
The class is fine but in log it is showing this one. Here everything closed
fine.
Then why it is showing like this
DBCP object created 2010-11-04 11:07:59 by the following code was never
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:37:25 -0500, Propes, Barry L
barry.l.pro...@citi.com wrote:
Not sure if it matters or not, but in your SponserSummaryDAO
method, it appears you establish the rs as null, but don't ever close
it? You might specifically try that.
And is it necessary to reassign all
From reading the doc, it seems the filters are invoked in the order in
which they appear in filter-mapping in web.xml. However I have a
situation where I have 2 filters one mapped using servlet-name and
other one mapped using url-pattern and they are not being invoked in
the right order.
Below
What was the URL of your request?
-Original Message-
From: Aggarwal, Ajay [mailto:ajay.aggar...@stratus.com]
Sent: 04 November 2010 16:09
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: filter order question
From reading the doc, it seems the filters are invoked in the order in
which they appear
2010/11/4 Aggarwal, Ajay ajay.aggar...@stratus.com:
From reading the doc, it seems the filters are invoked in the order in
which they appear in filter-mapping in web.xml. However I have a
situation where I have 2 filters one mapped using servlet-name and
other one mapped using url-pattern and
And here is whole response I receive, if I run into that error:
HTTP/1.1 500 Internal Server Error
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:26:36 GMT
Server: Microsoft-IIS/6.0
X-Powered-By: ASP.NET
Content-Type: text/html
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN
Hi all,
My secondary instance of Tomcat 6 does not process requests -- it simply
times out for everything. The only log is catalina.out and there are not
errors in it. Anyone know what could be wrong? I'm using Tomcat 6, Java
1.6.0_20, on Centos 5.5 Final.
I've set the secondary instance to use
At the risk of violating your request (not to point you to the documentation),
I'm going to point you at the documentation.
In particular: manual/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxypassreverse (from the Apache
httpd
docs)
This will rewrite response URLs. However, there is a caveat. It will not
rewrite
2010/11/4 Ari King ari.brandeis.k...@gmail.com:
|-- conf
|-- server.xml
|-- web.xml
Those two files are not sufficient.
Note, that the conf folder is read only from the second instance.
(The files in CATALINA_HOME\conf are never read).
On 11/4/2010 12:56 PM, Ari King wrote:
Hi all,
My secondary instance of Tomcat 6 does not process requests -- it simply
times out for everything. The only log is catalina.out and there are not
errors in it. Anyone know what could be wrong? I'm using Tomcat 6, Java
1.6.0_20, on Centos 5.5 Final.
Thank you so much Konstantin for pointing to these specs!
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Kolinko [mailto:knst.koli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:35 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: filter order question
2010/11/4 Aggarwal, Ajay ajay.aggar...@stratus.com:
On 04/11/2010 16:06, Will Sumekar wrote:
AFAIK if you dont specify contextConfigLocation system looks for default
filename applicationContext.xml at default location of ./WEB-INF/. But it
doesnt matter cos even if I put context-param the error still comes.
So far it looks like the error is
On 04/11/2010 05:50, mike houston wrote:
Hi..
Is there a framework for implementing database connection pooling in tomcat
6?
I am migrating my application from tomcat 4 to 6. There is already a
connection pooling implemented for the sql2000 server using the MS pool.exe
framework. But now
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
knst.koli...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/11/4 Ari King ari.brandeis.k...@gmail.com:
|-- conf
|-- server.xml
|-- web.xml
Those two files are not sufficient.
Note, that the conf folder is read only from the second instance.
(The files
On 04/11/2010 14:56, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
p.s. Don't send me to the Tomcat Apache docs, I've read them.
What happens if you define the balancer before you try to use it?
p
0x62590808.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I can deploy an old Java web application to Tomcat 6.0.18 using (Java
JDK 1.5.0.22) fine.
However, get error deploying same application to Tomcat 6.0.20. Cannot
deploy to any Tomcat later either, like
all Tomcat 6.0.24, 6.0.26, 6.0.28 and 6.0.29 versions give me same error
message:
Error
On 04/11/2010 14:52, Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote:
I appreciate any insights/pointers or help.
Look at the logs.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
From the RUNNING.txt you will need tomcat-juli.jar in $CATALINA_BASE/bin.
That being said, I start up and shut down 4 Tomcat instances when I'm working
on
cluster issues. Here's a typical directory structure I use for each Tomcat
that's a part of the cluster:
deimos-host/
├── bin
│ ├──
That's what I'm doing now Pid.
Not sure if that's helping much since it seemed to work the other way
round also. Switching the order still showed the same apparent
behavior.
See my response to Mark Eggers about how I've got it working right now.
I'd love to get any more input from you if there is
In looking at the JSPs, the dev team is coding all the paths inside a
c:url construct, which is why the context string is getting prepended
to every path in the document. What was throwing me off a bit was the
default doc was just a redirect as:
Interesting.
I'll have to try something similar for my situation.
What I'm trying to do is a bit of the reverse. I want
hostname:80/tomcat-host/manager to end up at (tomcat-host) /manager for four
different tomcat hosts. The forward stuff works fine, but the URLs coming back
all drop the
I am stumped. I see in Catalina.log only the cryptic error message like
below. No error in localhost.log file.Don't know what I might be
missing.
What is baffling is, same application gets deployed fine in Tomcat
6.0.18 and earlier.
Thanks for any pointers.
-Srini
Contents of Catalina.log:
Nov
On 04/11/2010 16:35, Nagulapalli, Srinivas wrote:
Nov 4, 2010 4:28:05 PM org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig deployWAR
SEVERE: Error deploying configuration descriptor MYPROJECT.war
And the contexts of your context.xml file is what?
Mark
No difference in context.xml file for Tomcat-6.0.18 and 6.0.20-both have
following:
Context
WatchedResourceWEB-INF/web.xml/WatchedResource
Context
Thanks for any pointers.
-Srini
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 4:41
Forgot to put contents of application's context.xml. Still no difference
in contents between 6.0.18 and 6.0.20- same file listed under
%TOMCAT_HOME%\conf\Catalina\localhost\MYPROJECT.xml for both versions
Contents of MYPROJECT.XML :
!-- The contents of this file will
2010/11/4 Nagulapalli, Srinivas srinivas.nagulapa...@starwoodvo.com:
Forgot to put contents of application's context.xml. Still no difference
in contents between 6.0.18 and 6.0.20- same file listed under
%TOMCAT_HOME%\conf\Catalina\localhost\MYPROJECT.xml for both versions
A lot is wrong with
Many thanks for the tip. Didn't realize how much context file changed. Changed
context.xml like below and it deploys fine now in 6.0.20.
Going to check and test more. Please tell if I am missing out on limb still.
Changed contents of MYPROJECT.xml that deploys fine:
2010/11/5 Nagulapalli, Srinivas srinivas.nagulapa...@starwoodvo.com:
Many thanks for the tip. Didn't realize how much context file changed.
Changed context.xml like below and it deploys fine now in 6.0.20.
Going to check and test more. Please tell if I am missing out on limb still.
Changed
Rainer, that's very true.
So I am wondering...If 1200 200 (Tomcat maxThreads), then what would be
the right way to solve this? Imagine that 2 Tomcats would crash, that would
leave me with 1200 400. I can't just raise the maxThreads to 600 for each
Tomcat, as that would probably perform even
I just got my own question answered whether connection_pool_size sets a pool
per server process.
This defines the number of connections made to the AJP backend that are
maintained as a connection pool. It will limit the number of those
connection that each web server child process can made.
This
On 04/11/2010 19:27, Marc Wilmots wrote:
The best solution would be to enable DisableReuse as Mark stated, although
I'm afraid that would be too big of a performance hit.
Have you tried it?
The cost of the required CPING/CPONG isn't that different to the cost of
creating a TCP/IP connection.
Honestlyno, I didn't.
The mod_jk scared the hell out of mewouldn't you? :-)
Using this option will have a strong performance penalty for Apache and
Tomcat. Use this only as a last resort in case of unfixable network
problems.
I'll give it a try tomorrow and see what it gives.
By the
Forget about my math question.
Obviously, connection_pool_size of 15, would mean there are 60 (4 tomcats)
in total per server process.
Then the math works out
Sorry, it's 1:08am over here :-)
2010/11/5 Marc Wilmots desj...@gmail.com
Honestlyno, I didn't.
The mod_jk scared the hell out
I added the attributes in connector executer. even though it is not working
Executer setting:
Connector executor=tomcatThreadPool
port=8080 protocol=HTTP/1.1
minSpareThreads=50
connectionTimeout=2
redirectPort=8443 /
I need to
From: rujin raj [mailto:rujin...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Connector Setting Problem in tomcat 6.0.29
I added the attributes in connector executer. even though
it is not working
Executer setting:
Connector executor=tomcatThreadPool
port=8080 protocol=HTTP/1.1
51 matches
Mail list logo
