Parallel deployment and session replication
I am an enthusiastic user of the new parallel deployment feature of tomcat 7. But I'm a little unclear about how it interacts with session replication. If I have a cluster of tomcat instances: instance1/A#001.war instance2/A#001.war instance3/A#001.war And they are all replicating sessions (say using SimpleTcpCluster). Then I want to upgrade, so I introduce more war files: instance1/A#001.war instance1/A#002.war instance2/A#001.war instance2/A#002.war instance3/A#001.war instance3/A#002.war Now, since these are effectively the same applications, they are all on the same multicast address and port. So I assume that sessions will now replicate between all 6 instances. * Will the old instances ever shut down? That is, will the sessions ever die on the old instances if they are part of the session replication cluster? * Is parallel deployment only designed to work with sticky sessions? Thanks Ari -- --> Aristedes Maniatis GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: auth-constraint
"Caldarale, Charles R" wrote: >> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bijes v...@gmail.com] >> Subject: Re: auth-constraint > >> Is there a way in tomcat 7 to mention the roles outside of web.xml. > >Read section 8 of the servlet 3.0 spec; you might be able to use a >web-fragment.xml to list the roles. > > - Chuck > > >THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE >PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended >recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and >delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. > > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org Check the realm docs for 7.0.20. There is an option documented that controls how * is used. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: auth-constraint
> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bije...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: auth-constraint > Is there a way in tomcat 7 to mention the roles outside of web.xml. Read section 8 of the servlet 3.0 spec; you might be able to use a web-fragment.xml to list the roles. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: auth-constraint
> Probably a bug in the version of Tomcat 5.?.? that you were using. See this > bugzilla entry: 5.26 Is there a way in tomcat 7 to mention the roles outside of web.xml. Bijesh. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bije...@gmail.com] >> Subject: auth-constraint > >> I was having the following entry in my application web.xml in tomcat 5. > > You need to be precise when stating Tomcat versions; Tomcat 5.what.what? > >> >> * >> > > Let's look at section 12.7 of the servlet spec: > > "The special role name "*" is a shorthand for all role names defined in the > deployment descriptor." > >> I was getting all the roles from the Database. > > Probably a bug in the version of Tomcat 5.?.? that you were using. See this > bugzilla entry: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570 > >> When I migrated to tomcat 7, I need to mention all the roles in >> application web.xml. > > As the spec requires. > > - Chuck > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its > attachments from all computers. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
Thanks Chris for your reply. Yeah im trying the ROOT.war way too and here i have one more issue with that: Now when i renamed my war to ROOT.war and drop it in webapps folder (without any context in server.xml), it deploys fine for the first time as the root app (Creates a ROOT folder in webapps), but if i make any change to any of my jsps and drop the new ROOT.war file, it says its deploying ROOT.war but it does not pick the changes after restart. It keeps showing me the old jsp when i run. I tried with autoDeploy=true in Host config but there is no change. Do i have to manually delete the ROOT folder that tomcat creates, everytime before the fresh deployment? Im trying different ways to understand what tomcat really is doing. Please explain this as i have been through enough confusion already about whats going on. Again, this is Tomcat 6.0.32, jdk 1.5, windows 7 OS. Thanks G From: Christopher Schultz To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:21 AM Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 G, On 8/12/2011 4:55 AM, exquisite wrote: > Hey Mark, I think i figured out what's going on with my > configuration and I feel that the Tomcat Documentation is not too > clear explaining this particular step. > > I have been editing the server.xml in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf > directory, dropped my war in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps directory but by > default tomcat distribution comes with ROOT folder inside webapps > directory and there by its not able to deploy my war file as ROOT. If that's the case, then you have not properly disabled auto-deploy in your . That's the only way that the webapps/ROOT directory should interfere. Seriously, what's wrong with re-naming your WAR file to ROOT.war? It. Just. Solves. So. Many. Problems. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5Fbz0ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAV1QCfXhoknQcGOSUN3jwHmw21b2iI angAoKUgJPT63bD1XwNrED0DkZcKuyOT =Vg+1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan, On 8/12/2011 3:02 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > Mystery solved, I think. > > I did a little more digging around & discovered that my cookie had > two JSESSIONID values. I didn't even know this was possible. Yep, cookies can have multiple values. You aren't doing this, but you can get two separate JSESSIONID cookies if you have one context nested inside the other. The paths are different, but one of them is a prefix of the other, so the nested context gets both cookies. You can confuse the hell out of yourself doing that (we did!) and it's best to avoid those situations. Tomcat is actually (thankfully!) tolerant of multiple JSESSIONID values: if there are many JSESSIONID cookies in the request, Tomcat loops through all of them to see if *any* are valid. The first valid one gets used (though there is no guarantee of the order in which they are tested). If none are valid (last time I read the code), it tries to use the last JSESSIONID requested as the new session id. I think that's probably not true anymore due to the (semi-) recent changes to session id management to help mitigate session hijacking and other nasty things. So, the JSESSIONID you were seeing probably had a path that wasn't the same as the webapp you are playing with, and that was the one you were looking at. Tomcat was ignoring it because it wasn't valid but you really had no way to tell without more invasive testing. > Neither of the values matched Tomcat's session id & the browser was > unable to update the cookie's JSESSIONID properly (no surprise). > > I deleted this rogue cookie & all apears to be working as expected. Glad you got your problem solved. > Lots of moving parts ... Yes. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5FkeUACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDT8ACbB/xEPsuxUv7paL87K9CUTLh5 Dr4AoIinSVA1oxVL5Hp+FQzelhloByAh =sGxB -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
Thanks Chuck for your point. Now when i renamed my war to ROOT.war and drop it in webapps folder (without any context in server.xml), it deploys fine for the first time as the root app (Creates a ROOT folder in webapps), but if i make any change to any of my jsps and drop the new ROOT.war file, it does not pick the changes. Do i have to manually delete the ROOT folder that tomcat creates, everytime before the fresh deployment? Im trying different ways to understand what tomcat really is doing. Please explain this as i have been through enough confusion already about whats going on. Again, this is Tomcat 6.0.32, jdk 1.5, windows 7 OS. Thanks G From: "Caldarale, Charles R" To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 7:28 AM Subject: RE: Cannot make war file as default app > From: exquisite [mailto:gautam_exquis...@yahoo.com] > Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app > i did not want to rename my war to ROOT.war And thereby make a lot more work for yourself. Simply rename it and be done. Using the horribly outdated and restrictive mechanism of placing elements in server.xml comes from the dark ages; don't go there. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: auth-constraint
> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bije...@gmail.com] > Subject: auth-constraint > I was having the following entry in my application web.xml in tomcat 5. You need to be precise when stating Tomcat versions; Tomcat 5.what.what? > > * > Let's look at section 12.7 of the servlet spec: "The special role name "*" is a shorthand for all role names defined in the deployment descriptor." > I was getting all the roles from the Database. Probably a bug in the version of Tomcat 5.?.? that you were using. See this bugzilla entry: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15570 > When I migrated to tomcat 7, I need to mention all the roles in > application web.xml. As the spec requires. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
auth-constraint
Hi, I was having the following entry in my application web.xml in tomcat 5. * I was getting all the roles from the Database. When I migrated to tomcat 7, I need to mention all the roles in application web.xml. PORTAL_DEV ADMIN So now I need to maintain the roles in both Database and in web.xml. Is there a way to mention the roles in web.xml as "*" Bijesh. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
Mystery solved, I think. I did a little more digging around & discovered that my cookie had two JSESSIONID values. I didn't even know this was possible. Neither of the values matched Tomcat's session id & the browser was unable to update the cookie's JSESSIONID properly (no surprise). I deleted this rogue cookie & all apears to be working as expected. Lots of moving parts ... -- Jonathan Rosenberg Founder & Executive Director Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary http://www.tabbysplace.org/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Get SSO ID on server
> Why bother? > > " > As soon as the user logs out of one web application (for example, by > invalidating the corresponding session if form based login is used), the > user's sessions in all web applications will be invalidated. Any > subsequent attempt to access a protected resource in any application > will require the user to authenticate himself or herself again. > " Right. But the application requires than an administrator can expulse an user. It's a client requirement. So, I need to record all "SSO sessions" FYI, I made it using by JSESSIONIDSSO cookie and works fine Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan, On 8/12/2011 2:14 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > I am using the same browser instance. Just reloading the page. Good. > Tomcat manager confirms the existence of a session. I am the only > user of this test machine, os no confusion there. Does the manager confirm that both webapps are still deployed? If so, does it have different session counts for both deployments? > Are there any config settings that would disable parallel > deployment? None that I know of. > I'm at a loss, since this test case is o simple. It does seem like it should work. This *is* a relatively new feature, so it's possible that there are some problems with it. I think you might need a comment from markt, as he's the one who built this feature and he might have some thoughts as to why it's not working as expected. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAk5FdNoACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PChDgCYrauN4A+ib+6qzY+AWLPEeVvZ tgCfakcS16fWlSXh7kNhInXZFrmWoqE= =yoEa -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: nested context issue in tomcat 7
> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bije...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: nested context issue in tomcat 7 > So you mean to say that my URL should be changed for the > second context ? No, continue to use the slash in the URL; only the location in the file system contains the # as a place-holder for the slash. > My context files are located at (I changed the file name > Reports-context.xml to Employee#Reports.xml so that it match the > context path in URL ) > /home/bijesh/tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml > /home/bijesh/tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee#Reports.xml Good; that all looks proper. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
I just reverified that session info is being sent (i.e., JSESSIONID).
Yes, that's the client cookie.
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director
Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chuck,
>
> On 8/12/2011 2:13 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>>> From: Caldarale, Charles R Subject: RE: Parallel Deployment &
>>> Sessions: What am I Missing?
>>
Results surprise me ('NEW version ')
>>
>>> Why is that surprising? To quote from the doc:
>>
>>> "If no session information is present in the request, use the
>>> latest version."
>>
>> You might want to sniff the traffic and see if the client is sending
>> any session information; I suspect it isn't.
>
> Jonathan's post from yesterday says he used Firebug and it looks like
> the JSESSIONID isn't changing... I suspect that's the client's cookie
> that he's describing.
>
> - -chris
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk5FcdQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PC4TwCfe/+LqdUTjlmv3sF086YXSAMR
> egsAn14aI8AVYpF+qmJn0gKVWKFT019Z
> =ZQfx
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: nested context issue in tomcat 7
Thanks Charles / Thomas, > This is not supported. You need to move > /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee/Reports > to > /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee#Reports > > and then specify your context as: > Thanks, I will be moving the Reports to /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee#Reports >> Where can I mention the path.my URLs are >> http://localhost:8080/Employee/logon.do >> http://localhost:8080/Employee/Reports/first.do > >> Thanks for the suggestion, but we are migrating from tomcat 5 to >> tomcat 7. Things work fine in tomcat 5. we would like to keep the >> application directory structure as is. > > That probably isn't going to be possible. You have over-lapping > docBase's and that is not supported. > So you mean to say that my URL should be changed for the second context ? Is there a way I can retain my URL(http://localhost:8080/Employee/Reports/first.do) , I do not want to change to http://localhost:8080/Employee#Reports/first.do Just wanted to confirm if things are fine from my end. My context files are located at (I changed the file name Reports-context.xml to Employee#Reports.xml so that it match the context path in URL ) /home/bijesh/tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml /home/bijesh/tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee#Reports.xml Thanks, Bijesh On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 12/08/2011 18:23, Bijesh Vijayan wrote: >> Thanks Charles, >> >>> What is the appBase setting for the named localhost? >> /home/bijesh/webapps > >> Where can I mention the path.my URLs are >> http://localhost:8080/Employee/logon.do >> http://localhost:8080/Employee/Reports/first.do > >> Thanks for the suggestion, but we are migrating from tomcat 5 to >> tomcat 7. Things work fine in tomcat 5. we would like to keep the >> application directory structure as is. > > That probably isn't going to be possible. You have over-lapping > docBase's and that is not supported. > >> I am not able to give absolute path for docBase as I an getting the >> message "docBase inside the context is ignored". I think I am getting >> this message as docBase directory is inside appBase directory. > > You must not specify the docBase since it is inside the appBase. All you > have managed to do is bypass Tomcat's warning. You may have double > deployment as a result. > file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml >>> docBase="./Employee" crossContext="true" reloadable="false" workDir="work/Employee"> > > This should be: > > file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee#Reports.xml >>> docBase="./Employee/Reports" crossContext="true" reloadable="false" workDir="work/Employee/Reports"> > > This is not supported. You need to move > /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee/Reports > to > /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee#Reports > > and then specify your context as: > > > Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Get SSO ID on server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chema, On 8/12/2011 3:51 AM, Chema wrote: >> Why do you need a consistent ID between the two apps? > > Because I'll store this ID into a record in database. The apps > checking every 60 sec if this record exists and, if dont , perform a > logout Why bother? " As soon as the user logs out of one web application (for example, by invalidating the corresponding session if form based login is used), the user's sessions in all web applications will be invalidated. Any subsequent attempt to access a protected resource in any application will require the user to authenticate himself or herself again. " - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5Fcj8ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDtcgCfUG72Ye6OwBBbP6hH2b5egWeZ QAsAoKSPB+FegDV4JQSpPxO8m0POpAM8 =Kzfn -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 8/12/2011 2:13 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: Caldarale, Charles R Subject: RE: Parallel Deployment &
>> Sessions: What am I Missing?
>
>>> Results surprise me ('NEW version ')
>
>> Why is that surprising? To quote from the doc:
>
>> "If no session information is present in the request, use the
>> latest version."
>
> You might want to sniff the traffic and see if the client is sending
> any session information; I suspect it isn't.
Jonathan's post from yesterday says he used Firebug and it looks like
the JSESSIONID isn't changing... I suspect that's the client's cookie
that he's describing.
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5FcdQACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PC4TwCfe/+LqdUTjlmv3sF086YXSAMR
egsAn14aI8AVYpF+qmJn0gKVWKFT019Z
=ZQfx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 G, On 8/12/2011 4:55 AM, exquisite wrote: > Hey Mark, I think i figured out what's going on with my > configuration and I feel that the Tomcat Documentation is not too > clear explaining this particular step. > > I have been editing the server.xml in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf > directory, dropped my war in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps directory but by > default tomcat distribution comes with ROOT folder inside webapps > directory and there by its not able to deploy my war file as ROOT. If that's the case, then you have not properly disabled auto-deploy in your . That's the only way that the webapps/ROOT directory should interfere. Seriously, what's wrong with re-naming your WAR file to ROOT.war? It. Just. Solves. So. Many. Problems. - -chris -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5Fbz0ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PAV1QCfXhoknQcGOSUN3jwHmw21b2iI angAoKUgJPT63bD1XwNrED0DkZcKuyOT =Vg+1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
Chris,
I am using the same browser instance. Just reloading the page.
Tomcat manager confirms the existence of a session. I am the only
user of this test machine, os no confusion there.
Are there any config settings that would disable parallel deployment?
I'm at a loss, since this test case is o simple.
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director
Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Christopher Schultz
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jonathan,
>
> On 8/12/2011 11:02 AM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>> 1) Copy foo##001.war to webapps & visit /foo. Results as expected
>> ('old version'). 2) Copy foo##002.war to webapps & reload /foo.
>> Results surprise me ('NEW version ')
>>
>> What am I missing here?
>
> I would have expected you getting the old version as well, but only if
> you had a session. IIRC, sessions are automatically created by any JSP
> that doesn't specifically disable them.
>
> Are you using the same window / same browser without a restart or
> anything when you visit the page for the second time?
>
> - -chris
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk5FbHwACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBGeACfajrlRMDl/K980mAdGwhlOqlS
> 5X8AnAk6/owcrZcba3BzjEUUKnjW4BtS
> =Dcgy
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
> From: Caldarale, Charles R
> Subject: RE: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
> > Results surprise me ('NEW version ')
> Why is that surprising? To quote from the doc:
> "If no session information is present in the request, use the latest version."
You might want to sniff the traffic and see if the client is sending any
session information; I suspect it isn't.
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
attachments from all computers.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
> From: shmol...@gmail.com [mailto:shmol...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jonathan
> Rosenberg
> Subject: Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
> 1) Copy foo##001.war to webapps & visit /foo.
> Results as expected ('old version').
Fine so far.
> 2) Copy foo##002.war to webapps & reload /foo.
By "reload", do you mean reload the webapp via the manager interface? Or just
reentering the URL?
> Results surprise me ('NEW version ')
Why is that surprising? To quote from the doc:
"If no session information is present in the request, use the latest version."
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its
attachments from all computers.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jonathan,
On 8/12/2011 11:02 AM, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> 1) Copy foo##001.war to webapps & visit /foo. Results as expected
> ('old version'). 2) Copy foo##002.war to webapps & reload /foo.
> Results surprise me ('NEW version ')
>
> What am I missing here?
I would have expected you getting the old version as well, but only if
you had a session. IIRC, sessions are automatically created by any JSP
that doesn't specifically disable them.
Are you using the same window / same browser without a restart or
anything when you visit the page for the second time?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk5FbHwACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PBGeACfajrlRMDl/K980mAdGwhlOqlS
5X8AnAk6/owcrZcba3BzjEUUKnjW4BtS
=Dcgy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: nested context issue in tomcat 7
On 12/08/2011 18:23, Bijesh Vijayan wrote: > Thanks Charles, > >> What is the appBase setting for the named localhost? > /home/bijesh/webapps > Where can I mention the path.my URLs are > http://localhost:8080/Employee/logon.do > http://localhost:8080/Employee/Reports/first.do > Thanks for the suggestion, but we are migrating from tomcat 5 to > tomcat 7. Things work fine in tomcat 5. we would like to keep the > application directory structure as is. That probably isn't going to be possible. You have over-lapping docBase's and that is not supported. > I am not able to give absolute path for docBase as I an getting the > message "docBase inside the context is ignored". I think I am getting > this message as docBase directory is inside appBase directory. You must not specify the docBase since it is inside the appBase. All you have managed to do is bypass Tomcat's warning. You may have double deployment as a result. >>> file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml >>>>> docBase="./Employee" >>> crossContext="true" >>> reloadable="false" >>> workDir="work/Employee"> This should be: >>> file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee#Reports.xml >>>>> docBase="./Employee/Reports" >>> crossContext="true" >>> reloadable="false" >>> workDir="work/Employee/Reports"> This is not supported. You need to move /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee/Reports to /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee#Reports and then specify your context as: Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: nested context issue in tomcat 7
> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bije...@gmail.com] > Subject: Re: nested context issue in tomcat 7 > Where can I mention the path.my URLs are > http://localhost:8080/Employee/logon.do > http://localhost:8080/Employee/Reports/first.do The path is derived from the name of the .xml file containing the element. I cannot be set in the element itself, unless the is in server.xml - which is strongly discouraged. > Thanks for the suggestion It's not a suggestion. > we are migrating from tomcat 5 to tomcat 7. Things work > fine in tomcat 5. we would like to keep the > application directory structure as is. Just because an illegal arrangement happened to give you usable results in one version does not mean it was correct. You must change it. Tomcat 7 is better at detecting invalid configurations. > I think I am getting this message as docBase directory is > inside appBase directory. Correct; docBase is not allowed if the webapps are deployed under the appBase; in that case, you need to remove both docBase attributes and place the Employee/Reports webapp in /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee#Reports, so it matches the name on the .xml file. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: nested context issue in tomcat 7
Thanks Charles, > What is the appBase setting for the named localhost? /home/bijesh/webapps >> file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml >>> docBase="./Employee" >> crossContext="true" >> reloadable="false" >> workDir="work/Employee"> > > The path attribute is not allowed here; remove it. Otherwise, the rest of > the above is probably ok, depending on the value of appBase in the > element of server.xml. > Where can I mention the path.my URLs are http://localhost:8080/Employee/logon.do http://localhost:8080/Employee/Reports/first.do > Again, the path attribute is not allowed; remove it. Note that you may not > nest webapps; try placing the Employee/Reports webapp in > /home/bijesh/webapps/EmployeeReports and adjust docBase appropriately. I > would also suggest making the docBase attributes absolute paths, since a > relative location is not terribly robust. Thanks for the suggestion, but we are migrating from tomcat 5 to tomcat 7. Things work fine in tomcat 5. we would like to keep the application directory structure as is. I am not able to give absolute path for docBase as I an getting the message "docBase inside the context is ignored". I think I am getting this message as docBase directory is inside appBase directory. Thanks, Bijesh. On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bije...@gmail.com] >> Subject: nested context issue in tomcat 7 > >> file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml >> > docBase="./Employee" >> crossContext="true" >> reloadable="false" >> workDir="work/Employee"> > > The path attribute is not allowed here; remove it. Otherwise, the rest of > the above is probably ok, depending on the value of appBase in the > element of server.xml. > >> file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee#Reports.xml >> > docBase="./Employee/Reports" >> crossContext="true" >> reloadable="false" >> workDir="work/Employee/Reports"> > > Again, the path attribute is not allowed; remove it. Note that you may not > nest webapps; try placing the Employee/Reports webapp in > /home/bijesh/webapps/EmployeeReports and adjust docBase appropriately. I > would also suggest making the docBase attributes absolute paths, since a > relative location is not terribly robust. > > What is the appBase setting for the named localhost? > > - Chuck > > > THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY > MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received > this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its > attachments from all computers. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
How do I log to a filename based on the full context name?
Reading http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2011/06/zero-downtime-deployment-and-rollback.html?m=1, it states If you do not use the full context name of the application in the log file name, you may end up in a situation where both versions of a web application are writing into the same log file So how do I get this full context name? We currently use the following to configure the filename under log4j 1.2.16 under tomcat 7.0.19 on windows 2008 64bit Thanks Chris
RE: nested context issue in tomcat 7
> From: Bijesh Vijayan [mailto:bije...@gmail.com] > Subject: nested context issue in tomcat 7 > file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml > docBase="./Employee" > crossContext="true" > reloadable="false" > workDir="work/Employee"> The path attribute is not allowed here; remove it. Otherwise, the rest of the above is probably ok, depending on the value of appBase in the element of server.xml. > file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee#Reports.xml > docBase="./Employee/Reports" > crossContext="true" > reloadable="false" > workDir="work/Employee/Reports"> Again, the path attribute is not allowed; remove it. Note that you may not nest webapps; try placing the Employee/Reports webapp in /home/bijesh/webapps/EmployeeReports and adjust docBase appropriately. I would also suggest making the docBase attributes absolute paths, since a relative location is not terribly robust. What is the appBase setting for the named localhost? - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: nested context issue in tomcat 7
Thanks Andre, > If that interpretation is correct, it would mean that docBase is "wherever > Tomcat happens to be running now" + a subdirectory "Employee". > Is that what you mean here ? No I mean my doc base is outside the tomcat directory. I mean my context to be inside the appBase(/home/bijesh/webapps) my absolute context directories are /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee/Reports my tomcat directory is in /home/bijesh/tomcat Thanks, Bijesh On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 12:51 PM, André Warnier wrote: > Bijesh Vijayan wrote: > ... > >> >> file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml >> > docBase="./Employee" > > Hi. > I find this docBase "suspicious", in the sense that it is (I think ) an > absolute path specification, based on "." which usually means "the current > directory". > If that interpretation is correct, it would mean that docBase is "wherever > Tomcat happens to be running now" + a subdirectory "Employee". > Is that what you mean here ? > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: nested context issue in tomcat 7
Bijesh Vijayan wrote: ... file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml Hi. I find this docBase "suspicious", in the sense that it is (I think ) an absolute path specification, based on "." which usually means "the current directory". If that interpretation is correct, it would mean that docBase is "wherever Tomcat happens to be running now" + a subdirectory "Employee". Is that what you mean here ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
nested context issue in tomcat 7
I have a appBase(/home/bijesh/webapps/) outside by CATALINA_BASE(same as CATALINA_HOME - /home/bijesh/tomcat). I have 2 context files, one file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee.xml file name = CATALINA_BASE/conf/Catalina/localhost/Employee#Reports.xml But tomcat is not looking at docBase(as docBase is given inside appBase, if the docBase is inside appBase, it will look for file name), it is looking at direcotry /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee(this is working fine) and /home/bijesh/webapps/Employee#Reports(this is not working). I have named the file as per tomcat documentation - http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/config/context.html Please let me know how I can load the second context. I want to keep I do not want to change by appBase in server.xml. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
So, it's gotta be something simple I'm missing. I decided to
construct a trivial test of parallel deployment.
Couldn't be simpler
(http://www.javacodegeeks.com/2011/06/zero-downtime-deployment-and-rollback.html?m=1):
$ mkdir WEB-INF
$ echo "" > WEB-INF/web.xml
$ echo 'old version ' > index.jsp
$ jar cf foo##001.war WEB-INF index.jsp
$ echo 'NEW version ' > index.jsp
$ jar cf foo##002.war WEB-INF index.jsp
1) Copy foo##001.war to webapps & visit /foo. Results as expected
('old version').
2) Copy foo##002.war to webapps & reload /foo. Results surprise me
('NEW version ')
What am I missing here?
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director
Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Pid wrote:
> On 12/08/2011 04:01, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>> Trying to fall asleep and just had a thought on my problem: are
>> context-param values shared across different context versions (as
>> implemented in parallel deployment)?
>
> Nope. The apps are self-contained.
>
> C
>
>
>
>
>> --
>> JR
>> On Aug 11, 2011 6:10 PM, "Jonathan Rosenberg" wrote:
>>> BTW: I'm using
>>>
>>> Apache Tomcat/7.0.6 JDK 1.6.0_22-b04
>>>
>>> on Linux.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jonathan Rosenberg
>>> Founder & Executive Director
>>> Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary
>>> http://www.tabbysplace.org/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg
>> wrote:
Great idea. I just retested aith Firebug & the JSESSIONIDs are
>> identical.
Ideas, anyone?
--
Jonathan Rosenberg
Founder & Executive Director
Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary
http://www.tabbysplace.org/
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 11/08/2011 21:56, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
>> Following up on my post the other day ... I figured out a clean way to
>> generate a Catalog##~~~.war Grails app that just yields an outage
>> page.
>>
>> Today I deployed & tested & sessions are not behaving as I expected.
>> Here's what I have
>>
>> 1) Deployed Catalog##0002.war.& started.
>> 2) Access app (/Catalog) & start a session (confirmed in Tomcat
>> Manager).
>> 3) Deploy Catalog##~~~.war & started.
>> 4) Access app again (/Catalog). I immediately get the outage page.
>> 5) Stop Catalog##~~~.
>> 5) Access /Catalog. Session is back.
>>
>> I was expecting to see the original app, not an outage page. I
>> checked in Manager & it shows 1 session associated with Catalog##0002
>> and none with Catalog##~~~, as expected.
>>
>> Am I confused as to what should be happening?
>
> Use fiddler, firebug or similar to look at the headers being sent to
> Tomcat. Check the session IDs match up.
>
> Mark
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Cannot make war file as default app
> From: exquisite [mailto:gautam_exquis...@yahoo.com] > Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app > i did not want to rename my war to ROOT.war And thereby make a lot more work for yourself. Simply rename it and be done. Using the horribly outdated and restrictive mechanism of placing elements in server.xml comes from the dark ages; don't go there. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
RE: Sticky Session Not Working With Apache 2.0.54 and Tomcat 7.0.8
The jvmRoute's for both server.xmls are properly set to the worker names and are not commented out. This was the first thing I verified. Here are the settings in workers.properties (worker tomcat7A identical to tomcat7C except for port, since both are running on the same server for testing. In production, we will probably install them on separate boxes): worker.list=loadbalancer,jkstatus worker.tomcat7C.type=ajp13 worker.tomcat7C.host= worker.tomcat7C.port=4931 worker.tomcat7C.lbfactor=1 worker.loadbalancer.type=lb worker.loadbalancer.balance_workers=tomcat7A,tomcat7C worker.loadbalancer.sticky_session=1 worker.jkstatus.type=status Here are the JkMount settings in mod_jk.conf: JkMount /jkmanager/* jkstatus JkMount / servlet/* loadbalancer Load balancing is working, but subsequent requests from a single client are being routed to the other Tomcat instance despite sticky_session being set to 1. -Original Message- From: Rainer Jung [mailto:rainer.j...@kippdata.de] Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 4:17 AM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Sticky Session Not Working With Apache 2.0.54 and Tomcat 7.0.8 On 11.08.2011 15:32, Lataxes, Karl wrote: > OK, I'm getting close. On the server side, I'm adding a "Set-Cookie" header > containing the session id I want to use. The client emulator I am using has > similarly been modified to add a "Cookie" header with the session id sent by > the server, but sticky sessions are still not working. In the mod_jk log, > there is a "searching worker for partial sessionid" reference that contains > the correct session id, but "." was not appended. In my > workers.properties file, "sticky_session" is set to 1. The "jvmRoute" > parameters in my respective Tomcat server.xml files are set to the workers > identified in the workers.properties file as well. What do I have to do to > append "." to the outgoing session id? When Tomcat sets a session cookie, and you correctly set the jvmRoute in server.xml, it automatically adds the value of jvmRoute to the end of the session id, separated with a dot. Make sure you did not set the jvmRoute in some line in server.xml that is cmmented out. To make stickyness with mod_jk happen, the jvmRoute used for Tomcat should be equal to the name of the worker pointing to the Tomcat instance. Finally you add all those workers to a load balancer worker in mod_jk and JkMount the URLs to the load balancer worker. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[SECURITY] CVE-2011-2481: Apache Tomcat information disclosure vulnerability
CVE-2011-2481: Apache Tomcat information disclosure vulnerability Severity: low Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.16 Previous versions are not affected. Description: The re-factoring of XML validation for Tomcat 7.0.x re-introduced the vulnerability previously reported as CVE-2009-0783. This was initially reported as a memory leak (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51395). If a web application is the first web application loaded, this bug allows that web application to potentially view and/or alter the web.xml, context.xml and tld files of other web applications deployed on the Tomcat instance. Mitigation: 7.0.x users should upgrade to 7.0.17 or later Example: See https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29936#c12 for an example web application that can be used to replace the XML parser used by Tomcat. Credit: The security implications of bug 51395 were identified by the Tomcat security team. References: http://tomcat.apache.org/security.html http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html The Apache Tomcat Security Team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
[SECURITY] CVE-2011-2729: Commons Daemon fails to drop capabilities (Apache Tomcat)
CVE-2011-2729: Commons Daemon fails to drop capabilities (Apache Tomcat) Severity: Important Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation Versions Affected: Tomcat 7.0.0 to 7.0.19 Tomcat 6.0.30 to 6.0.32 Tomcat 5.5.32 to 5.5.33 Description: Due to a bug in the capabilities code, jsvc (the service wrapper for Linux that is part of the Commons Daemon project) does not drop capabilities allowing the application to access files and directories owned by superuser. This vulnerability only applies if: a) Tomcat is running on a Linux operating system b) jsvc was compiled with libcap c) -user parameter is used The Tomcat versions above shipped with source files for jsvc that included this vulnerability. Mitigation: Affected users of all versions can mitigate these vulnerabilities by taking any of the following actions: a) upgrade to jsvc 1.0.7 or later b) do not use -user parameter to switch user c) recompile the jsvc without libcap support Updated jsvc source is included in Apache Tomcat 7.0.20 and will be included in the next releases of Tomcat 6.0.x and 5.5.x. Updated source can be obtained from the Apache Commons Daemon project. Credit: This issue was identified by Wilfried Weissmann. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Availability of Tomcat 5.5.34
My plan is to T&R 5.5.34 the week after next… I'm traveling next week :/ On Aug 12, 2011, at 12:25 AM, Sachin Mankapure wrote: > > Hi Jim, > > Is there any update on release date of 5.5.34? > > Thanks, > -Sachin > > > Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> I am tempted to do a release next week... we seem to have enough >> to warrant it. >> >> On Jul 21, 2011, at 5:57 AM, Sachin Mankapure wrote: >> >>> >>> Thanks. I wanted to know *when* 5.5.34 will be available. I got the >>> answer. >>> >>> >>> Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2011/7/20 msachin : > > Where can I get information about availability of Tomcat 5.3.34? > Thanks. Here: http://tomcat.apache.org/download-55.cgi http://tomcat.apache.org/whichversion.html If you want o be notified about release you can subscribe to the announce@ mailing list I do not think that it can happen sooner than next release of 6.0. There is not much activity with Tomcat 5.5 development. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://old.nabble.com/Availability-of-Tomcat-5.5.34-tp32098293p32106146.html >>> Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Availability-of-Tomcat-5.5.34-tp32098293p32247100.html > Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Apache Tomcat unable to send the request. tomcat throwing 502 Gate Way error
On 12/08/2011 12:31, rakesh k wrote: > Hi Igor Cicimov > > Thank you very much for replying .. > port="8082" protocol="HTTP/1.1" >connectionTimeout="2" >redirectPort="8443" /> > That doesn't answer the question. Please remove all of the commented parts of the server.xml and paste the whole thing, inline, into your next reply. > I am heryby attaching the proxy pass which we used to connect tomcat through > apache. (You're not attaching it.) p > ProxyPass / balancer://msf/ stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid > > > BalancerMember http://localhost:8082 route=msf1 > > > > > > This is what we use in the produciton scenario, the above mentioned > configuration is the exact executor configuration we used for this scenario. > > > can you please help on this since we are running this on production which > has to be resolved. > Regards > Rakesh > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote: > >> I can't see the connection between the Connector you showed and port 8082. >> What is listening on port 8082? Also what is your "tomcatThreadPool" >> executor configuration? >> >> >> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:56 PM, rakesh k wrote: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> I am using Apache tomcat 6.0.18 version >>> >>> I am not sure, why the tomcat is giving us this problem. While doing Load >>> testing we are sending 5000 requests at a time, where we are getting 4-5 >>> Bad >>> gate way error. >>> >>> Please find the error details below >>> >>> [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: >>> proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) >>> [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to >>> 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () >>> [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: >>> proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) >>> [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to >>> 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () >>> [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: >>> proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) >>> [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to >>> 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () >>> [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: >>> proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) >>> [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to >>> 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () >>> [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: >>> proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) >>> [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to >>> 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.5.38 () >>> >>> >>> I am also attaching the tomcat configuration like server.xml with this >>> question, >>> >>> can you please help how to get out this issue, if you require anything >> from >>> me i can proivude the etire details. >>> >>> Please find the server.xml tomcat connector attribute portion. >>> >>> >>>>> port="8080" protocol="HTTP/1.1" >>> connectionTimeout="2" >>> redirectPort="8443" /> >>> >>> can you please help me ragarding this issue. >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Rakesh >>> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Apache Tomcat unable to send the request. tomcat throwing 502 Gate Way error
Hi Igor Cicimov Thank you very much for replying .. I am heryby attaching the proxy pass which we used to connect tomcat through apache. ProxyPass / balancer://msf/ stickysession=JSESSIONID|jsessionid BalancerMember http://localhost:8082 route=msf1 This is what we use in the produciton scenario, the above mentioned configuration is the exact executor configuration we used for this scenario. can you please help on this since we are running this on production which has to be resolved. Regards Rakesh On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote: > I can't see the connection between the Connector you showed and port 8082. > What is listening on port 8082? Also what is your "tomcatThreadPool" > executor configuration? > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:56 PM, rakesh k wrote: > > > Hi All > > > > I am using Apache tomcat 6.0.18 version > > > > I am not sure, why the tomcat is giving us this problem. While doing Load > > testing we are sending 5000 requests at a time, where we are getting 4-5 > > Bad > > gate way error. > > > > Please find the error details below > > > > [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > > [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () > > [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > > [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () > > [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > > [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () > > [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > > [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () > > [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > > [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.5.38 () > > > > > > I am also attaching the tomcat configuration like server.xml with this > > question, > > > > can you please help how to get out this issue, if you require anything > from > > me i can proivude the etire details. > > > > Please find the server.xml tomcat connector attribute portion. > > > > > > > port="8080" protocol="HTTP/1.1" > > connectionTimeout="2" > > redirectPort="8443" /> > > > > can you please help me ragarding this issue. > > > > > > Regards > > Rakesh > > >
Re: Apache Tomcat unable to send the request. tomcat throwing 502 Gate Way error
I can't see the connection between the Connector you showed and port 8082. What is listening on port 8082? Also what is your "tomcatThreadPool" executor configuration? On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 7:56 PM, rakesh k wrote: > Hi All > > I am using Apache tomcat 6.0.18 version > > I am not sure, why the tomcat is giving us this problem. While doing Load > testing we are sending 5000 requests at a time, where we are getting 4-5 > Bad > gate way error. > > Please find the error details below > > [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () > [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () > [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () > [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () > [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: > proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) > [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to > 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.5.38 () > > > I am also attaching the tomcat configuration like server.xml with this > question, > > can you please help how to get out this issue, if you require anything from > me i can proivude the etire details. > > Please find the server.xml tomcat connector attribute portion. > > > port="8080" protocol="HTTP/1.1" > connectionTimeout="2" > redirectPort="8443" /> > > can you please help me ragarding this issue. > > > Regards > Rakesh >
Apache Tomcat unable to send the request. tomcat throwing 502 Gate Way error
Hi All I am using Apache tomcat 6.0.18 version I am not sure, why the tomcat is giving us this problem. While doing Load testing we are sending 5000 requests at a time, where we are getting 4-5 Bad gate way error. Please find the error details below [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.5.38 () I am also attaching the tomcat configuration like server.xml with this question, can you please help how to get out this issue, if you require anything from me i can proivude the etire details. Please find the server.xml tomcat connector attribute portion. can you please help me ragarding this issue. Regards Rakesh
Apache Tomcat unable to send the request. tomcat throwing 502 Gate Way error
Hi All I am not sure, why the tomcat is giving us this problem. While doing Load testing we are sending 5000 requests at a time, where we are getting 4-5 Bad gate way error. Please find the error details below [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 01:00:50 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 01:01:01 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 01:28:04 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.205 () [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 06:10:49 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.25.206 () [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] (103)Software caused connection abort: proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) [Wed Aug 10 19:01:18 2011] [error] proxy: pass request body failed to 127.0.0.3:8082 (localhost) from 72.163.5.38 () I am also attaching the tomcat configuration like server.xml with this question, can you please help how to get out this issue, if you require anything from me i can proivude the etire details. Please find the server.xml tomcat connector attribute portion. can you please help me ragarding this issue. Regards Rakesh
[ANN] Apache Tomcat 7.0.20 released
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache Tomcat 7.0.20 Apache Tomcat 7.0.20 includes bug fixes and the following new features and fixes compared to version 7.0.19: - JSP files with dependencies in JARs are no longer recompiled on every access thereby improving performance. - Update to version 1.1.22 of the native component of the AJP and HTTP APR/native connectors. - Update to Commons Daemon 1.0.7. - Converted unit tests to JUnit 4. Please refer to the change log for the complete list of changes: http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/changelog.html Note that this version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three bundled with Tomcat native binaries for Windows operating systems running on different CPU architectures. Downloads: http://tomcat.apache.org/download-70.cgi Migration guide from Apache Tomcat 5.5.x and 6.0.x: http://tomcat.apache.org/migration.html Thank you, -- The Apache Tomcat Team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
Hi P, As i mentioned in my initial thread that i did not want to rename my war to ROOT.war so i haven't tried that route but i think i figured out whats going on and posted my findings already. Thank you guys for your time and please suggest if im wrong with my solution i posted in my previous email. Thanks G From: Pid To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:46 AM Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app On 12/08/2011 09:32, exquisite wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I tried that way as well but i get the same issue. Tomcat does not even > deploy my war. All it says on console is ' Server startup in xxx ms" and > stays there forever. > > Im getting confused and wondering if there is any mistake in the Tomcat > documentation. > > Please suggest. Does your app deploy, if you rename it ROOT.war and put it in the appBase, without the Context definition in server.xml? p > thanks > G > > > > > > From: Mark Thomas > To: Tomcat Users List > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:19 AM > Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app > > On 12/08/2011 09:04, exquisite wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I followed the below steps from Tomcat Wiki for making my war file as the >> default webapp, but tomcat is not deploying my war: >> >> How do I make my web application be the Tomcat default application? >> >> Method 2.2 >> If you really know what you are doing.. > > Sigh. > >> - leave your war file in CATALINA_BASE/webapps, under its original name >> - turn off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup in your Host element in the >> server.xml file. >> - explicitly define all application Contexts in >> server.xml, specifying both path and docBase. You must do this, because >> you have disabled all the Tomcat auto-deploy mechanisms, and Tomcat will not >> deploy your applications anymore unless it finds their Context in >> the server.xml. >> >> I did exactly like they said in WIKI (autoDeploy=false, >> deployOnStartup=false) , but after doing all this, Tomcat does not even >> deploy my war file. here is my host configuration in server.xml after my >> changes: >> >> > unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="false" deployOnStartup="false" >> xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false"> >> >> > > You claim to be deploying a WAR file so I'd expect to see > docBase="myapp.war" > > Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
Hey Mark, I think i figured out what's going on with my configuration and I feel that the Tomcat Documentation is not too clear explaining this particular step. I have been editing the server.xml in the $CATALINA_HOME/conf directory, dropped my war in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps directory but by default tomcat distribution comes with ROOT folder inside webapps directory and there by its not able to deploy my war file as ROOT. If I delete/rename the existing ROOT directory and with my same configuration once i start tomcat, then it created a new ROOT directory with my war's contents in it. Now it deployed my war in ROOT directory and im able to access my app as root app/default app. As CATALINA_BASE and CATALINA_HOME both point to same location by default, I felt that the Tomcat documentation needs to be little clarified about this step for other users. For this step we can add to make sure to delete the folder ROOT in webapps if exists Please let me know your thoughts or any suggestions for me. Thanks G From: exquisite To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:32 AM Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app Hi Mark, I tried that way as well but i get the same issue. Tomcat does not even deploy my war. All it says on console is ' Server startup in xxx ms" and stays there forever. Im getting confused and wondering if there is any mistake in the Tomcat documentation. Please suggest. thanks G From: Mark Thomas To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:19 AM Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app On 12/08/2011 09:04, exquisite wrote: > Hello, > > I followed the below steps from Tomcat Wiki for making my war file as the > default webapp, but tomcat is not deploying my war: > > How do I make my web application be the Tomcat default application? > > Method 2.2 > If you really know what you are doing.. Sigh. > - leave your war file in CATALINA_BASE/webapps, under its original name > - turn off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup in your Host element in the > server.xml file. > - explicitly define all application Contexts in > server.xml, specifying both path and docBase. You must do this, because > you have disabled all the Tomcat auto-deploy mechanisms, and Tomcat will not > deploy your applications anymore unless it finds their Context in > the server.xml. > > I did exactly like they said in WIKI (autoDeploy=false, > deployOnStartup=false) , but after doing all this, Tomcat does not even > deploy my war file. here is my host configuration in server.xml after my > changes: > > unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="false" deployOnStartup="false" > xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false"> > > You claim to be deploying a WAR file so I'd expect to see docBase="myapp.war" Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
On 12/08/2011 09:32, exquisite wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I tried that way as well but i get the same issue. Tomcat does not even > deploy my war. All it says on console is ' Server startup in xxx ms" and > stays there forever. > > Im getting confused and wondering if there is any mistake in the Tomcat > documentation. > > Please suggest. Does your app deploy, if you rename it ROOT.war and put it in the appBase, without the Context definition in server.xml? p > thanks > G > > > > > > From: Mark Thomas > To: Tomcat Users List > Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:19 AM > Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app > > On 12/08/2011 09:04, exquisite wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I followed the below steps from Tomcat Wiki for making my war file as the >> default webapp, but tomcat is not deploying my war: >> >> How do I make my web application be the Tomcat default application? >> >> Method 2.2 >> If you really know what you are doing.. > > Sigh. > >> - leave your war file in CATALINA_BASE/webapps, under its original name >> - turn off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup in your Host element in the >> server.xml file. >> - explicitly define all application Contexts in >> server.xml, specifying both path and docBase. You must do this, because >> you have disabled all the Tomcat auto-deploy mechanisms, and Tomcat will not >> deploy your applications anymore unless it finds their Context in >> the server.xml. >> >> I did exactly like they said in WIKI (autoDeploy=false, >> deployOnStartup=false) , but after doing all this, Tomcat does not even >> deploy my war file. here is my host configuration in server.xml after my >> changes: >> >> > unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="false" deployOnStartup="false" >> xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false"> >> >> > > You claim to be deploying a WAR file so I'd expect to see > docBase="myapp.war" > > Mark > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
Hi Mark, I tried that way as well but i get the same issue. Tomcat does not even deploy my war. All it says on console is ' Server startup in xxx ms" and stays there forever. Im getting confused and wondering if there is any mistake in the Tomcat documentation. Please suggest. thanks G From: Mark Thomas To: Tomcat Users List Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:19 AM Subject: Re: Cannot make war file as default app On 12/08/2011 09:04, exquisite wrote: > Hello, > > I followed the below steps from Tomcat Wiki for making my war file as the > default webapp, but tomcat is not deploying my war: > > How do I make my web application be the Tomcat default application? > > Method 2.2 > If you really know what you are doing.. Sigh. > - leave your war file in CATALINA_BASE/webapps, under its original name > - turn off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup in your Host element in the > server.xml file. > - explicitly define all application Contexts in > server.xml, specifying both path and docBase. You must do this, because > you have disabled all the Tomcat auto-deploy mechanisms, and Tomcat will not > deploy your applications anymore unless it finds their Context in > the server.xml. > > I did exactly like they said in WIKI (autoDeploy=false, > deployOnStartup=false) , but after doing all this, Tomcat does not even > deploy my war file. here is my host configuration in server.xml after my > changes: > > unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="false" deployOnStartup="false" > xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false"> > > You claim to be deploying a WAR file so I'd expect to see docBase="myapp.war" Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
On 12/08/2011 09:04, exquisite wrote: > Hello, > > I followed the below steps from Tomcat Wiki for making my war file as the > default webapp, but tomcat is not deploying my war: > > How do I make my web application be the Tomcat default application? > > Method 2.2 > If you really know what you are doing.. Sigh. > - leave your war file in CATALINA_BASE/webapps, under its original name > - turn off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup in your Host element in the > server.xml file. > - explicitly define all application Contexts in > server.xml, specifying both path and docBase. You must do this, because > you have disabled all the Tomcat auto-deploy mechanisms, and Tomcat will not > deploy your applications anymore unless it finds their Context in > the server.xml. > > I did exactly like they said in WIKI (autoDeploy=false, > deployOnStartup=false) , but after doing all this, Tomcat does not even > deploy my war file. here is my host configuration in server.xml after my > changes: > > unpackWARs="true" autoDeploy="false" deployOnStartup="false" > xmlValidation="false" xmlNamespaceAware="false"> > > You claim to be deploying a WAR file so I'd expect to see docBase="myapp.war" Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Sticky Session Not Working With Apache 2.0.54 and Tomcat 7.0.8
On 11.08.2011 15:32, Lataxes, Karl wrote: > OK, I'm getting close. On the server side, I'm adding a "Set-Cookie" header > containing the session id I want to use. The client emulator I am using has > similarly been modified to add a "Cookie" header with the session id sent by > the server, but sticky sessions are still not working. In the mod_jk log, > there is a "searching worker for partial sessionid" reference that contains > the correct session id, but "." was not appended. In my > workers.properties file, "sticky_session" is set to 1. The "jvmRoute" > parameters in my respective Tomcat server.xml files are set to the workers > identified in the workers.properties file as well. What do I have to do to > append "." to the outgoing session id? When Tomcat sets a session cookie, and you correctly set the jvmRoute in server.xml, it automatically adds the value of jvmRoute to the end of the session id, separated with a dot. Make sure you did not set the jvmRoute in some line in server.xml that is cmmented out. To make stickyness with mod_jk happen, the jvmRoute used for Tomcat should be equal to the name of the worker pointing to the Tomcat instance. Finally you add all those workers to a load balancer worker in mod_jk and JkMount the URLs to the load balancer worker. Regards, Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Cannot make war file as default app
Sorry i Missed to update the Tomcat version im using: I have Tomcat 6.0.32 running on Windows 7 and JDK 1.5 Please help. Thanks G From: exquisite To: "users@tomcat.apache.org" Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:04 AM Subject: Cannot make war file as default app Hello, I followed the below steps from Tomcat Wiki for making my war file as the default webapp, but tomcat is not deploying my war: How do I make my web application be the Tomcat default application? Method 2.2 If you really know what you are doing.. - leave your war file in CATALINA_BASE/webapps, under its original name - turn off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup in your Host element in the server.xml file. - explicitly define all application Contexts in server.xml, specifying both path and docBase. You must do this, because you have disabled all the Tomcat auto-deploy mechanisms, and Tomcat will not deploy your applications anymore unless it finds their Context in the server.xml. I did exactly like they said in WIKI (autoDeploy=false, deployOnStartup=false) , but after doing all this, Tomcat does not even deploy my war file. here is my host configuration in server.xml after my changes: I have a war and i wanted to deploy it as war (did not want to follow other methods about renaming to ROOT.war or creating ROOT.xml etc) and wanted to make my web app as the default application. Please help me with this. thanks in advance -G
Re: Parallel Deployment & Sessions: What am I Missing?
On 12/08/2011 04:01, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > Trying to fall asleep and just had a thought on my problem: are > context-param values shared across different context versions (as > implemented in parallel deployment)? Nope. The apps are self-contained. C > -- > JR > On Aug 11, 2011 6:10 PM, "Jonathan Rosenberg" wrote: >> BTW: I'm using >> >> Apache Tomcat/7.0.6 JDK 1.6.0_22-b04 >> >> on Linux. >> >> -- >> Jonathan Rosenberg >> Founder & Executive Director >> Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary >> http://www.tabbysplace.org/ >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Jonathan Rosenberg > wrote: >>> Great idea. I just retested aith Firebug & the JSESSIONIDs are > identical. >>> >>> Ideas, anyone? >>> >>> -- >>> Jonathan Rosenberg >>> Founder & Executive Director >>> Tabby's Place, a Cat Sanctuary >>> http://www.tabbysplace.org/ >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 11/08/2011 21:56, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > Following up on my post the other day ... I figured out a clean way to > generate a Catalog##~~~.war Grails app that just yields an outage > page. > > Today I deployed & tested & sessions are not behaving as I expected. > Here's what I have > > 1) Deployed Catalog##0002.war.& started. > 2) Access app (/Catalog) & start a session (confirmed in Tomcat > Manager). > 3) Deploy Catalog##~~~.war & started. > 4) Access app again (/Catalog). I immediately get the outage page. > 5) Stop Catalog##~~~. > 5) Access /Catalog. Session is back. > > I was expecting to see the original app, not an outage page. I > checked in Manager & it shows 1 session associated with Catalog##0002 > and none with Catalog##~~~, as expected. > > Am I confused as to what should be happening? Use fiddler, firebug or similar to look at the headers being sent to Tomcat. Check the session IDs match up. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Cannot make war file as default app
Hello, I followed the below steps from Tomcat Wiki for making my war file as the default webapp, but tomcat is not deploying my war: How do I make my web application be the Tomcat default application? Method 2.2 If you really know what you are doing.. - leave your war file in CATALINA_BASE/webapps, under its original name - turn off autoDeploy and deployOnStartup in your Host element in the server.xml file. - explicitly define all application Contexts in server.xml, specifying both path and docBase. You must do this, because you have disabled all the Tomcat auto-deploy mechanisms, and Tomcat will not deploy your applications anymore unless it finds their Context in the server.xml. I did exactly like they said in WIKI (autoDeploy=false, deployOnStartup=false) , but after doing all this, Tomcat does not even deploy my war file. here is my host configuration in server.xml after my changes: I have a war and i wanted to deploy it as war (did not want to follow other methods about renaming to ROOT.war or creating ROOT.xml etc) and wanted to make my web app as the default application. Please help me with this. thanks in advance -G
Re: Get SSO ID on server
> Why do you need a consistent ID between the two apps? Because I'll store this ID into a record in database. The apps checking every 60 sec if this record exists and, if dont , perform a logout - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Generating SSL certificates
On 12/08/2011 02:26, Darryl Lewis wrote: > Our certificates are about to expire and I need to generate new ones for > tomcat. I'm using keytool, but getting a strange error. Please start an entirely new thread, rather than replying to an existing email & just editing the subject & body (which is called thread hijacking). p - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Re: Get SSO ID on server
On 11/08/2011 22:31, Christopher Schultz wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chema, > > On 8/11/2011 5:00 PM, Chema wrote: >> How I can get SSO ID on a servlet? > > Get the cookie value for JSESSIONIDSSO. > >> I want to know this ID without browser sends a cookie to server. > > Browser cookies are a requirement to use Tomcat's SSO. Given that, just > read the cookie out of the request. Why do you need a consistent ID between the two apps? p - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
