-Original Message-
From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 6:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat 7.0 & spring web applcaiton context - Fedora 17
On 4/22/2013 2:34 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
André,
On 4/22/13 6:44 PM, André Warnier wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> On 4/20/13 6:08 PM, chris derham wrote:
>>> I think that you have articulated your suggestion very w
2013/4/20 Jerry Malcolm <2ndgenfi...@gmail.com>:
> I have been searching for several hours for a basic JSTL answer with no
> luck. From what I can tell, JSTL is under the umbrella of Tomcat.
> Hopefully someone can help me out.
>
You are welcome.
> I simply want to use an existing already-parsed
Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 4/20/13 6:08 PM, chris derham wrote:
I think that you have articulated your suggestion very well. I
think you have weighed the pros well and been open to debate.
Personally I just don't think what you propose
On 4/22/2013 2:34 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Khurram,
On 4/22/13 6:26 AM, Khurram Raza wrote:
So are there any thoughts on this issue which I am not able to
resolve yet?
I'm not sure anyone really understands what is going on.
You are usin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jerry,
On 4/20/13 2:14 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> I have been searching for several hours for a basic JSTL answer
> with no luck. From what I can tell, JSTL is under the umbrella of
> Tomcat.
Nope, but I can understand the confusion.
JSTL is a st
Jeffrey Janner wrote:
...
In actuality, he should have stopped the first sentence at "Engine", and then
continued with a new sentence (keeping in mind the simplified structure):
"The Engine will then see if the first string after the hostname portion
of the request URL matches any of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Khurram,
On 4/22/13 6:26 AM, Khurram Raza wrote:
> So are there any thoughts on this issue which I am not able to
> resolve yet?
I'm not sure anyone really understands what is going on.
You are using a Servlet to configure (and apparently shut-dow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Jeffrey,
On 4/22/13 4:18 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message- From: André Warnier
>> [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 7:03 PM To:
>> Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: two responses from one request -
>> how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
On 4/20/13 6:08 PM, chris derham wrote:
> I think that you have articulated your suggestion very well. I
> think you have weighed the pros well and been open to debate.
> Personally I just don't think what you propose will have the effect
> t
Leo Donahue - RDSA IT wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. [mailto:smithh032...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Tomcat access log reveals hack attempt: "HEAD /manager/html
HTTP/1.0" 404
also, if an 'ANN' email was sent, where /expert tomcat/ users can
derive/develop a list of t
> -Original Message-
> From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
> Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 7:03 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: two responses from one request - how is it possible ?
>
> Jakub 1983 wrote:
> > http://www.mulesoft.com/tomcat-connector states:
> >
> > Using
>-Original Message-
>From: Howard W. Smith, Jr. [mailto:smithh032...@gmail.com]
>Subject: Re: Tomcat access log reveals hack attempt: "HEAD /manager/html
>HTTP/1.0" 404
>
>
>also, if an 'ANN' email was sent, where /expert tomcat/ users can
>derive/develop a list of the popular/frequent URL
chris derham wrote:
But honestly, I am also a bit at a loss now as to how to continue. There is
of course no way for me to prove the validity of the scheme by installing it
on 31 million (20%) of webservers on the Internet and looking at the
resulting bot activity patterns to confirm my suspicio
> But honestly, I am also a bit at a loss now as to how to continue. There is
> of course no way for me to prove the validity of the scheme by installing it
> on 31 million (20%) of webservers on the Internet and looking at the
> resulting bot activity patterns to confirm my suspicions.
Try to en
So are there any thoughts on this issue which I am not able to resolve
yet?
-Original Message-
From: Khurram Raza
Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:08 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat 7.0 & spring web applcaiton context - Fedora 17
Hi Mark,
I recently noticed that I cannot
chris derham wrote:
Let me just summarise my arguments then :
1) These scans are a burden for all webservers, not just for the vulnerable
ones. Whether we want to or not, we currently all have to invest resources
into countering (or simply responding to) these scans. Obviously, just
ignoring th
On 22/04/2013 01:03, André Warnier wrote:
> Jakub 1983 wrote:
>> http://www.mulesoft.com/tomcat-connector states:
>>
>> Using the current arrangement, both Connectors will pass all requests to
>> the same Engine, which will in turn pass all these requests to both of
>> its
>> contained web applicat
18 matches
Mail list logo
