Hi folks,
I recently enabled a QueryTimeoutInterceptor with queryTimeout of 60 seconds in
a JDBC Pool data source (7.0.37). When the app was shut down, Tomcat said: The
web application [/...] appears to have started a thread named
[OracleTimeoutPollingThread] but has failed to stop it...
We
On 07/05/2013 09:16, Michael-O wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently enabled a QueryTimeoutInterceptor with queryTimeout of 60 seconds
in a JDBC Pool data source (7.0.37). When the app was shut down, Tomcat said:
The web application [/...] appears to have started a thread named
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 07/05/2013 09:16, Michael-O wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently enabled a QueryTimeoutInterceptor with queryTimeout of 60
seconds in a JDBC Pool data source (7.0.37). When the app was shut down,
Tomcat said: The web application [/...] appears to have
On 07/05/2013 10:25, Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013 09:16,
Michael-O wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently enabled a QueryTimeoutInterceptor with queryTimeout of
60 seconds in a JDBC Pool data source (7.0.37). When the app was
shut down, Tomcat said: The web
Hi All,
Thanks for your views.
It seems to be like very difficult to come for a conclusion :-)
Regards
Eashwar
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, David N. Smith david.sm...@cornell.eduwrote:
Didn't you know that 'rm' was vulnerable on Linux?!?!
An attacker with escalated
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 07/05/2013 10:25, Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013 09:16,
Michael-O wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently enabled a QueryTimeoutInterceptor with queryTimeout of
60 seconds in a JDBC Pool data source (7.0.37). When the app
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 07/05/2013 10:25, Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013 09:16,
Michael-O wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently enabled a QueryTimeoutInterceptor with queryTimeout of
60 seconds in a JDBC Pool data source (7.0.37). When the app
Hello
What are the certified JDKs that Tomcat 7.0.35 can run on in a
production environment?
Hendré
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Hendré Louw wrote:
Hello
What are the certified JDKs that Tomcat 7.0.35 can run on in a
production environment?
I believe that should be mentioned on the which version ? page at
http://tomcat.apache.org
-
To unsubscribe,
On 07/05/2013 12:47, André Warnier wrote:
Hendré Louw wrote:
Hello
What are the certified JDKs that Tomcat 7.0.35 can run on in a
production environment?
I believe that should be mentioned on the which version ? page at
http://tomcat.apache.org
+1. Those are the minimum versions.
Given
André
Thank you for the link. The page states Minimum Java Version. Can I
therefor run Tomcat 7.0.35 on Java 1.7.0_21? Is the exact Java version
the Tomcat development team used for a specific Tomcat release not
more correct for production environments?
Hendré
On 7 May 2013 13:47, André Warnier
Hendré Louw wrote:
André
Thank you for the link. The page states Minimum Java Version. Can I
therefor run Tomcat 7.0.35 on Java 1.7.0_21? Is the exact Java version
the Tomcat development team used for a specific Tomcat release not
more correct for production environments?
It should not be,
On 07/05/2013 13:43, André Warnier wrote:
Hendré Louw wrote:
André
Thank you for the link. The page states Minimum Java Version. Can I
therefor run Tomcat 7.0.35 on Java 1.7.0_21? Is the exact Java version
the Tomcat development team used for a specific Tomcat release not
more correct for
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:35:19PM -0400, Jesse Barnum wrote:
[snip]
I am sure that this would be out of scope, but if we pictured an ideal
scenario, it seems like there would be one configuration file that is tightly
managed by the developer, which is replaced when the app is redeployed, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael,
On 5/7/13 6:43 AM, Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013 10:25,
Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013 09:16,
Michael-O wrote:
Hi folks,
I recently enabled a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hendré,
On 5/7/13 7:41 AM, Hendré Louw wrote:
What are the certified JDKs that Tomcat 7.0.35 can run on in a
production environment?
I run Tomcat 7.0.3x+ on Oracle Java 1.6.0_26-b03. I haven't quite
moved-up to Java 1.7 anywhere, yet, but Mark
Installing Tomcat 7.0.39 using the service.bat will pick up the server jvm.dll
located in the jdk directory, but now that there is a separate download for a
server jre at 7u21, should we be using that instead?
C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_21\jre\bin\server\jvm.dll
Or use the new Server JRE
From: Leo Donahue - RDSA IT [mailto:leodona...@mail.maricopa.gov]
Subject: server jvm
now that there is a separate download for a server jre at 7u21, should we
be using that instead?
It looks like the Server JRE is somewhere in between a JDK and traditional
JRE. It is 64-bit only, but
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 4:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Why is context.xml no longer copied to
Catalina/localhost/myapp.xml?
On 06/05/2013 21:35, Jesse Barnum wrote:
On May 6, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Mark
-Original Message-
From: Mark H. Wood [mailto:mw...@iupui.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 8:41 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why is context.xml no longer copied to
Catalina/localhost/myapp.xml?
On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 04:35:19PM -0400, Jesse Barnum wrote:
[snip]
On May 7, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Mark H. Wood mw...@iupui.edu wrote:
Well, the developer can simply pack into the app. whatever internal
configuration is needed, since he has ready access to the interior of
the app and can deposit on the classpath *.properties, *.xml, or
anything else he wants.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 5/7/13 8:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/05/2013 13:43, André Warnier wrote:
Hendré Louw wrote:
André
Thank you for the link. The page states Minimum Java Version.
Can I therefor run Tomcat 7.0.35 on Java 1.7.0_21? Is the exact
Hello Christopher,
Am 2013-05-07 17:20, schrieb Christopher Schultz:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael,
On 5/7/13 6:43 AM, Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013 10:25,
Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013 09:16,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Michael,
On 5/7/13 4:33 PM, Michael-O wrote:
Am 2013-05-07 17:20, schrieb Christopher Schultz:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
Michael,
On 5/7/13 6:43 AM, Michael-O wrote:
Von: Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org On 07/05/2013
24 matches
Mail list logo
