On 24.05.2013 17:54, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Top reported that Tomcat was taking somewhere between 550-600% CPU.
> (This is a 4-core hyperthreaded CPU so I have 8 logical cores. 'ab'
> was taking about 100% CPU so I think 600% CPU means it was roughly
> pegging 6 of my logical cores. Roughly
Hi Serge, Daniel & Albert
Thanks, it does help. Seems like there are many options.
Regards,
Hua Jie
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Albert Kam wrote:
> Hopefully these open source nosql-tomcat-session-managers could be helpful
> in your jorney :
> https://github.com/jcoleman/tomcat-redis-sess
Hi everyone
I developed an application using two threads where in one of them I started to
run one socket to ask for information and in the another, application runs a
serversocket to receive the data. In STS runs perfectly(Windows) but when I run
this application on Solaris. threads do not run
Hi all,
afther starting tomcat I not that free memory of my VPS still near 0.
So it is normal this large usage of RAM?
O.S.: Debian 7.0 (wheezy) 64 bit
Apache Tomcat/7.0.28
JVM version: 1.7.0_03-b21 (Oracle)
root@ianpapserver:/opt/tomcat/bin# free -m
total used free
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Ravi,
On 5/24/13 4:59 PM, Vanga Palli, Ravindra Kumar wrote:
> I don't think we are using Executor's in our tomcat 6.0.28 server
> configuration. Both of the following stack traces clearly indicate
> that i am not using executors instead I am using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BT,
On 5/24/13 3:04 PM, B T wrote:
> Thanks for your guys' feedback ... I had removed 6.0.37 and
> installed 6.0.16. I then put back 6.0.37 (in a different directory)
> and tried it again and it somehow magically worked with 6.0.37
> (after it had a
Chris,
I don't think we are using Executor's in our tomcat 6.0.28 server
configuration. Both of the following stack traces clearly indicate that i am
not using executors instead I am using JioEndpoint
I can give two examples from my logs:
Here is the output of kill -3 which gives output of
Chris,
Sorry I should have posted the data first. I probably missed the most important
part of a load test. I will do it shortly.
And I am not using Jmeter now,I am using an http client for load test. I am
testing it on Solaris x86 server 64bit JVM. And i have collected the samples
for Tomcat
2013/5/24 B T :
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in different behaviors
> between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
>
> I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for quite some time - and it
> has worked very well. I was in the process of testing a new configuration and
> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 09:32:46 -0700
> From: its_toas...@yahoo.com
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 6.0.16 vs 6.0.37 puzzle
>
> On 5/24/2013 9:04 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > BT,
> >
> > On 5/24/13 11:09 AM, B T wr
I would first look in the Tomcat log files to see if anything useful
is recorded at the time of the blank response. I'd also ask the
browser to display the page source to see if it's actually empty or
contains something (perhaps quite a lot of something) that renders as
an empty page. It might be
On 5/24/2013 9:04 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BT,
On 5/24/13 11:09 AM, B T wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in
different behaviors between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for quit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
BT,
On 5/24/13 11:09 AM, B T wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in
> different behaviors between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
>
> I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for quite some time
> - and it has worked very well.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/23/13 11:11 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
> As I said before a lot of time was spent during the
> ResponseFacade.setContentType() method call. That doesn't tell the
> whole story but more or less the high utilization is mainly in the
> tom
On 24/05/2013 15:54, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Chirag,
>
> On 5/23/13 11:11 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
>> Chris,
>
>> The profiler shows very high CPU utilization in Tomcat threads.
>
>> As I said before a lot of time was spent during the
>> ResponseFacade.setContentType() method call. That doe
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone here might have some insight in different behaviors
between 6.0.16 and 6.0.37.
I've been using version 6.0.16 (With CentOS 5) for quite some time - and it has
worked very well. I was in the process of testing a new configuration and was
exploring the possibil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chirag,
On 5/23/13 11:11 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The profiler shows very high CPU utilization in Tomcat threads.
>
> As I said before a lot of time was spent during the
> ResponseFacade.setContentType() method call. That doesn't tell
Hopefully these open source nosql-tomcat-session-managers could be helpful
in your jorney :
https://github.com/jcoleman/tomcat-redis-session-manager
https://github.com/dawsonsystems/Mongo-Tomcat-Sessions
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
> On May 24, 2013, at 7:28 AM, 杨华杰 wro
On May 24, 2013, at 7:28 AM, 杨华杰 wrote:
> Hi
>
> Basically I want to configure a tomcat cluster.
>
> I am using tomcat 6 and tomcat 7 and I want to store the session in
> database.
>
> I am looking to this document
> http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/cluster-howto.html . But
> unfortunate
Hi,
Does
http://www.intelligrape.com/blog/2010/07/21/tomcat-6-session-persistence-through-jdbcstore/
help
answer your question?
HTH
Kind regards/met vriendelijke groet,
Serge Fonville
http://www.sergefonville.nl
Convince Microsoft!
They need to add TRUNCATE PARTITION in SQL Server
https://con
Hi
Basically I want to configure a tomcat cluster.
I am using tomcat 6 and tomcat 7 and I want to store the session in
database.
I am looking to this document
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/cluster-howto.html . But
unfortunately I didn't find any document to store session in database. I
I changed a little in my code:
final AtomicLong writeResponseTime= new AtomicLong(0);
final long timeout = 3;
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
async.setTimeout(timeout);
async.addListener(new AsyncListener(){
@Override
On 24/05/2013 10:27, jie tang wrote:
> But it means that even if I write some content to response, the onTimeout
> method is still called
Correct. The timeout starts when the AsyncContext is started and is
reset every time data is written to the response. Exactly the same way
socket timeouts work.
But it means that even if I write some content to response, the onTimeout
method is still called
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas
> On 24/05/2013 10:15, jie tang wrote:
> > I tried the following code:
> > final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
> > async.setTimeout(3);
> >
> >
On 24/05/2013 10:15, jie tang wrote:
> I tried the following code:
> final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
> async.setTimeout(3);
>
> async.addListener(new AsyncListener(){
>
> @Override
> public void onComplete(AsyncEvent event) throws I
I tried the following code:
final AsyncContext async = req.startAsync();
async.setTimeout(3);
async.addListener(new AsyncListener(){
@Override
public void onComplete(AsyncEvent event) throws IOException {
System.out.println(Threa
Thank you very much
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas
> On 24/05/2013 09:23, jie tang wrote:
> > So if I use AsyncContext.start to run a Runnable. When that Runnable does
> > some work but not write to response, will AsyncListener.onTimeout be
> > invoked?
>
> Yes, unless you set the timeout to zero or les
On 24/05/2013 09:23, jie tang wrote:
> So if I use AsyncContext.start to run a Runnable. When that Runnable does
> some work but not write to response, will AsyncListener.onTimeout be
> invoked?
Yes, unless you set the timeout to zero or less (no timeout).
The default value is 30 seconds.
Mark
So if I use AsyncContext.start to run a Runnable. When that Runnable does
some work but not write to response, will AsyncListener.onTimeout be
invoked?
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas
> On 24/05/2013 09:16, jie tang wrote:
> > Thanks.
> >
> > So the only way to avoid the invocation of AsyncListener.onTim
On 24/05/2013 09:16, jie tang wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> So the only way to avoid the invocation of AsyncListener.onTimeout is that
> we invoke AsyncContext.complete or AsyncContext.dispatch?
Or write some content to the response.
Mark
>
>
> 2013/5/24 Mark Thomas
>
>> On 24/05/2013 09:05, jie tan
Thanks.
So the only way to avoid the invocation of AsyncListener.onTimeout is that
we invoke AsyncContext.complete or AsyncContext.dispatch?
2013/5/24 Mark Thomas
> On 24/05/2013 09:05, jie tang wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I don't understand the meaning of timeout of an asynchronous operation.
> >
On 24/05/2013 09:05, jie tang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand the meaning of timeout of an asynchronous operation.
> Servlet 3.0 says "The time out applies to the AsyncContext once the
> container-initiated dispatch during which one of the
> ServletRequest.startAsync methods was called has ret
Hi,
I don't understand the meaning of timeout of an asynchronous operation.
Servlet 3.0 says "The time out applies to the AsyncContext once the
container-initiated dispatch during which one of the
ServletRequest.startAsync methods was called has returned to the container."
But when is the completi
On 24/05/2013 08:11, Padhalni, Bhuwan Chandra (Bhuwan Chandra) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone guide to download the tomcat 64 bit installer for linux 64 bit
> platform?
No such download exists. There are no architecture dependent components
for Linux (unlike Windows).
The platform neutral .tar.gz
Hi,
Can someone guide to download the tomcat 64 bit installer for linux 64 bit
platform?
best regards,
bhuwan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apac
35 matches
Mail list logo